Talk:Barbie: Difference between revisions
Squitchtweak (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:There is a separate article [[List of Barbie's friends and family]] which goes into more detail. There is also [[Barbie's careers]]. However, a list of ''every'' Barbie doll would run into problems with [[WP:NOTGUIDE]] and [[WP:TOPIC]], as well as making the article too long. The article has tried to give a summary of the various dolls, but it doesn't try to list all of them. [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289592/Im-Barbie-Man-Collector-spends-80-000-fills-bedrooms-3-000-Barbies-says-wants-twice-many.html Here] is a man who owns a collection of 2000 Barbie dolls and 1000 Kens (yes, really).--'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 05:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
:There is a separate article [[List of Barbie's friends and family]] which goes into more detail. There is also [[Barbie's careers]]. However, a list of ''every'' Barbie doll would run into problems with [[WP:NOTGUIDE]] and [[WP:TOPIC]], as well as making the article too long. The article has tried to give a summary of the various dolls, but it doesn't try to list all of them. [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289592/Im-Barbie-Man-Collector-spends-80-000-fills-bedrooms-3-000-Barbies-says-wants-twice-many.html Here] is a man who owns a collection of 2000 Barbie dolls and 1000 Kens (yes, really).--'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 05:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
Shouldn't the Barbie links box be at the bottom of the main Barbie article, so people can easily find pages like family and friends? |
|||
Also, would a page about different ranges of Barbie dolls be appropriate? Eg. Fashionistas, So In Style, The Look, Generation Girls, I Can Be, Dreamtopia... |
|||
[[User:Squitchtweak|Squitchtweak]] ([[User talk:Squitchtweak|talk]]) 11:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Squitchtweak |
Revision as of 11:26, 18 April 2018
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 9, 2004, March 9, 2005, March 9, 2006, March 9, 2007, March 9, 2008, March 9, 2009, and March 9, 2014. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bradenwells, Superjhn, Acmattia, Mtakemot (article contribs). Template:Vital article
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Barbie article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JulieK9, G.lopez2383, Jazmine Anthony, Jennawalters13 (article contribs).
Controversy and evaluation
First, The controversy of Barbie that provided on the website is a little bit chaotic. You can laid them out the point by point. Secondly, the controversies laid on the website is not so comprehensive and persuasive. Search much reliable resource before writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.93.160 (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I strongly agree and would like to put in sub-categories of 'Body Image', 'Diversity', 'Barbie as a role model' and 'Safety'. I am unsure what the Barbies in the microwave bit is doing in this section - it's interesting, but doesn't seem important enough to make the Wikipedia page, and doesn't really fit under 'Controversy'. The term 'evaluation' seems odd too - what exactly is meant by this? Squitchtweak (talk) 05:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Squitchtweak
I, Squitchtweak, went ahead and ordered the controversy section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squitchtweak (talk • contribs) 23:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Barbie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.handbag.com/fashion/news-christian-louboutin-explains-barbie-fat-ankle-comments/v1
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mastercollector.com/articles/dolls/dollnews31301.shtml
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C562706%2C00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gallery.bcentral.com/GID4729088P1681774-COLLECTIBLES/BARBIE/SHARE-A-SMILE-BECKY.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100731162937/http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/07/22/09-55673.pdf to http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/07/22/09-55673.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
"Australian terror plan to hide plane bomb in Barbie revealed"
This probably fails WP:NOTNEWS but it is one of the more unusual uses for a Barbie doll. She is so thin that she can't hold much explosives. "The luggage containing the devices was deemed overweight", unlike Barbie.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- The brand of doll would seem to be irrelevant. Though I get the sense that your comments are 'probably' in jest.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot led to a change in the rules banning more than 100ml of liquid in hand luggage.[1] Neither a Barbie doll nor a meat grinder seems ideal for this, but this news article says it was a "large Barbie doll". Supersize Barbie, perhaps. Anyway, the media was fascinated by the thought of Ms Roberts being used in this way. Apparently, "Lebanon’s interior minister Nohad Machnouk told reporters that the bombs never made it on the plane because the handbag they were placed in was 15.4 pounds above the weight permitted by the airline."--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- All of which is out of this article's scope.--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot led to a change in the rules banning more than 100ml of liquid in hand luggage.[1] Neither a Barbie doll nor a meat grinder seems ideal for this, but this news article says it was a "large Barbie doll". Supersize Barbie, perhaps. Anyway, the media was fascinated by the thought of Ms Roberts being used in this way. Apparently, "Lebanon’s interior minister Nohad Machnouk told reporters that the bombs never made it on the plane because the handbag they were placed in was 15.4 pounds above the weight permitted by the airline."--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barbie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629231234/http://purelyrics.com/index.php?lyrics=fhjpacrk to http://www.purelyrics.com/index.php?lyrics=fhjpacrk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barbie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219102401/http://www.lawdit.co.uk/reading_room/room/view_article.asp?name=..%2Farticles%2FMattel%20Loses%20Trade%20Mark%20Battle%20with.htm to http://www.lawdit.co.uk/reading_room/room/view_article.asp?name=..%2Farticles%2FMattel%20Loses%20Trade%20Mark%20Battle%20with.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
How is there no list of barbie characters/dolls?
The Barbie doll franchise is one of the most successful toy brands of all-time with billions of dolls sold worldwide and comes in so many different characters or "Careers". For this reason the list of all of the different barbie dolls should be more easily accessible and other than just being listed at the beginning of the article. Giggleshack603 (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- There is a separate article List of Barbie's friends and family which goes into more detail. There is also Barbie's careers. However, a list of every Barbie doll would run into problems with WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:TOPIC, as well as making the article too long. The article has tried to give a summary of the various dolls, but it doesn't try to list all of them. Here is a man who owns a collection of 2000 Barbie dolls and 1000 Kens (yes, really).--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Barbie links box be at the bottom of the main Barbie article, so people can easily find pages like family and friends?
Also, would a page about different ranges of Barbie dolls be appropriate? Eg. Fashionistas, So In Style, The Look, Generation Girls, I Can Be, Dreamtopia...
Squitchtweak (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Squitchtweak
- B-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- B-Class fashion articles
- Mid-importance fashion articles
- B-Class Toys articles
- Top-importance Toys articles
- WikiProject Toys articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Selected anniversaries (March 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2014)