Jump to content

Talk:LGBTQ rights in Japan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by KKato1994 - ""
KKato1994 (talk | contribs)
Update WGSS 4610-5610 Queer Theory assignment details
Line 5: Line 5:
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=B|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=B|importance=Low}}
}}
}}

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Ohio_University/WGSS_4610-5610_Queer_Theory_(Spring_2018) | assignments = [[User:KKato1994|KKato1994]] }}


==Celebrities Section==
==Celebrities Section==

Revision as of 02:39, 29 April 2018


Celebrities Section

I find it very odd that the only celebrity mentioned is Tadano - he's not even gay. There are many many celebrities who are openly LGBT and whose examples could serve as better examples for LGBT rights in Japan. I recommend removing Tadano from this page and replacing him with actual LGBT celebrities who are open and visual in the Japanese media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syounanwiki (talkcontribs) 03:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

little things

first off, what does the last guy mean 'deviant"? sexual minorities??? and what does the first sentence mean "...no laws concerning age of consent..." I don't like what that's implying. I am going to change that. If you have a problem discusss it here. Cloudblazer (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

They are not necessarily the same thing. Sexual minorities can "deviant" people who are straight Doseiai2 (talk) 06:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I was not the first to nominate, but seems like a good idea to merge this article into LGBT rights in Japan. Other opinions? Queerudite (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

opening paragraph

This article lacks one. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The opening states that there are now laws against workplace discrimination, but the article on sexual minorities in Japan states that Tokyo passed such a law in 2005. Also, saying that Western influence has led to more acceptance might be too big of a generalization - some sources cite Victorian and missionary influences as the reason for more laws/more consistently enforced laws against homosexual acts/non-gender conforming acts. Faunablues (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

The line, "the army (euphemistically called self-defense forces)", does not seem particullary neutral to me. --70.29.1.109 (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleonic Code

:Same-sex sexual activity was legalized in 1880 after the installation of the Napoleonic Code and the age of consent is currently equalized.

日本語で書かせて頂きます。上記の記述に疑問があります。日本では同性愛(男色)は1873年に西洋文化の影響で一旦は違法化されたものの、その後の1880年に再度違法ではない状態に戻っただけです。上記の「ナポレオン法典によって合法化された」という書き方では、1880年より前は、ずっと違法だったかのように誤解を与えます。1873年までは日本の歴史では同性愛(Gay)にとても寛容だったこと、それどころか同性愛(男色)と異性愛(女色)の明確な区別さえなく、「日本時男性は、男色を問題だとは考えていなから、若い男性も関係にある相手も、男色を誇りとし、それを公然と口にし、隠そうとさえしない」(『日本巡察記』(平凡社 Alessandro Valignano))ということが当たり前だったことにも触れるべきだと思います。--110.66.111.120 (talk) 15:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on LGBT rights in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recognition of same-sex relationships

I would like to add more details and crtiques of Shibuya's same-sex partnership certificate system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKato1994 (talkcontribs) 14:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]