Jump to content

User talk:Courcelles: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
→‎Lidia Vianu: new section
Line 94: Line 94:
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Ireland at the 2006 Winter Olympics]]==
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Ireland at the 2006 Winter Olympics]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Ireland at the 2006 Winter Olympics]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Kpgjhpjm|Kpgjhpjm]]</small> -- [[User:Kpgjhpjm|Kpgjhpjm]] ([[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|talk]]) 17:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Ireland at the 2006 Winter Olympics]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Kpgjhpjm|Kpgjhpjm]]</small> -- [[User:Kpgjhpjm|Kpgjhpjm]] ([[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|talk]]) 17:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

== Lidia Vianu ==

Hello,<br />This is the first time I deal with a deleted page, please help me. This is the page of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lidia Vianu (2nd nomination)|Lidia Vianu]]. I was not the author of the page.<br /> [[WP:DRV]] tells me to talk to you first. The reason is "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page."<br /> I can not see the deleted article, but I understand that the deleted version was written by people (including [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lidiavianu/Lidia Vianu|User:Lidiavianu]]) familiar with commercial websites, and not familiar with Wikipedia and [[WP:N]]. The new proposed version is [[User:Turbojet/sandbox|here]]. For writers, many notes refer to their works, but some also speak about herself (notes 1, 2, 3). Her work is described in newspapers with national coverage as the diaries ''[[Adevărul]]'', ''[[România Liberă]]'', ''[[Ziarul Financiar]]'', ''[[Evenimentul Zilei]]'', as well the [[Romanian Television]] (TVR), [[Radio Romania Muzical]]. Notes 5, 8, 9, 13–17, 22 are interviews given by her, which show the interest of the press and of the cultural field to her. Notes 28 and 32 are her introductions by publishers outside of Romania. Many notes are from 2017–2018. Of course, separately each note may be declared insufficient for notability, as in above mentioned AfD, but together it shows coverage. Please tell me what I have to do. Thanks. --[[User:Turbojet|Turbojet]] ([[User talk:Turbojet|talk]]) 18:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:31, 15 August 2018

WikiProphet

I finally wrote it (link)... —PaleoNeonate22:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bennv3771 -- Bennv3771 (talk) 12:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bennv3771 -- Bennv3771 (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bennv3771 -- Bennv3771 (talk) 15:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Iceland at the 2014 Winter Paralympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Iceland at the 2014 Winter Paralympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nigeria at the 2018 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bennv3771 -- Bennv3771 (talk) 06:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nigeria at the 2018 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nigeria at the 2018 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bennv3771 -- Bennv3771 (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you protect them both to persistent IP's disruptive editing? 115.164.172.23 (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyprus at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Denmark at the 2014 Winter Paralympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andorra at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 12:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andorra at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andorra at the 2002 Winter Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 15:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andorra at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andorra at the 2002 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article India at the 2006 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bosnia and Herzegovina at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cyprus at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cyprus at the 2002 Winter Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:South Africa at the 2002 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cyprus at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyprus at the 2002 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Costa Rica at the 1980 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyprus at the 1994 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bermuda at the 1998 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bosnia and Herzegovina at the 2002 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina at the 2002 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 05:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bermuda at the 1998 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bermuda at the 1998 Winter Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bermuda at the 1998 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bermuda at the 1998 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ireland at the 2006 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kpgjhpjm -- Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lidia Vianu

Hello,
This is the first time I deal with a deleted page, please help me. This is the page of Lidia Vianu. I was not the author of the page.
WP:DRV tells me to talk to you first. The reason is "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page."
I can not see the deleted article, but I understand that the deleted version was written by people (including User:Lidiavianu) familiar with commercial websites, and not familiar with Wikipedia and WP:N. The new proposed version is here. For writers, many notes refer to their works, but some also speak about herself (notes 1, 2, 3). Her work is described in newspapers with national coverage as the diaries Adevărul, România Liberă, Ziarul Financiar, Evenimentul Zilei, as well the Romanian Television (TVR), Radio Romania Muzical. Notes 5, 8, 9, 13–17, 22 are interviews given by her, which show the interest of the press and of the cultural field to her. Notes 28 and 32 are her introductions by publishers outside of Romania. Many notes are from 2017–2018. Of course, separately each note may be declared insufficient for notability, as in above mentioned AfD, but together it shows coverage. Please tell me what I have to do. Thanks. --Turbojet (talk) 18:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]