Jump to content

Talk:Harry Potter: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Highest grossing: new section
Line 72: Line 72:
Ping [[User:QuestFour|QuestFour]] and [[User:Nick Mitchell 98|Nick Mitchell 98]] for inclusion. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Ping [[User:QuestFour|QuestFour]] and [[User:Nick Mitchell 98|Nick Mitchell 98]] for inclusion. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
:Support single line for book title and year per my original WP:BOLD edit; line breaks between the book title and year are simply not needed in my opinion (and unecesarily lengthen the infobox). – [[User:Nick Mitchell 98|Nick Mitchell 98]] <sup>[[User talk:Nick Mitchell 98|talk]]</sup> 14:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
:Support single line for book title and year per my original WP:BOLD edit; line breaks between the book title and year are simply not needed in my opinion (and unecesarily lengthen the infobox). – [[User:Nick Mitchell 98|Nick Mitchell 98]] <sup>[[User talk:Nick Mitchell 98|talk]]</sup> 14:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

== Highest grossing ==

Since the lede says HP is the 3rd highest grossing film series, I inserted the names of the top 2 so readers won't have to go looking (like I did).--[[User:Daveler16|Daveler16]] ([[User talk:Daveler16|talk]]) 18:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:46, 17 July 2019

Template:Vital article

Good articleHarry Potter has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHarry Potter is the main article in the Harry Potter novels series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 7, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 23, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 29, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 1, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 28, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
April 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 2, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 22, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 4, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
May 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
August 17, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Is something missing from this article?

I couldn't find what I thought would be the most basic thing about Harry Potter in the article: a list of the titles of the seven Harry Potter books. The closest I can find is that all seven titles happen to be mentioned in the 2500-word "Plot" section, but that seems a very poor way to render the information. Ultimately I had to go (via this article's hatnote) to Harry Potter (disambiguation) , which had a "See Also" section which listed an article List of Harry Potter-related topics, which redirected to Outline of Harry Potter, which had a section "The original books" which give the titles. It seems to me (someone not steeped in the Harry Potter milieu), that not having (or at least pointing to) the list is a significant defect for the base article about Harry Potter. --R. S. Shaw (talk) 04:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The new game, Wizards Unite needs to be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davemoser123 (talkcontribs) 13:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

all on one line, or separate line for date?

The current film list in the infobox lists the film, then the date on a new line. This was changed recently ("Unnecessary line breaks") and reverted ("not unnecessary, better visually"). I think that the line breaks are unnecessary, and the list looks better all on one line, and advocate the change to a single line per entry. What are other editors opinions?

Ping QuestFour and Nick Mitchell 98 for inclusion. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support single line for book title and year per my original WP:BOLD edit; line breaks between the book title and year are simply not needed in my opinion (and unecesarily lengthen the infobox). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 14:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Highest grossing

Since the lede says HP is the 3rd highest grossing film series, I inserted the names of the top 2 so readers won't have to go looking (like I did).--Daveler16 (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]