Talk:Morari Bapu: Difference between revisions
Brihaspati (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Apollo1203 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:::{{ping|Moksha88}}, both article are different and has different context. It should be kept IMO. {{ping|Harshil169}}, {{tq|useless to argue...}} are poor choice of words. Should be in more polite words. Regards, [[User:Nizil Shah|Nizil]] ([[User talk:Nizil Shah|talk]]) 04:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
:::{{ping|Moksha88}}, both article are different and has different context. It should be kept IMO. {{ping|Harshil169}}, {{tq|useless to argue...}} are poor choice of words. Should be in more polite words. Regards, [[User:Nizil Shah|Nizil]] ([[User talk:Nizil Shah|talk]]) 04:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::It’s really useless to argue when user says {{tq|"If it wasn't appropriate for one article, it's not appropriate for any article on Wikipedia." }} Atleast, they should know about context and meaning before giving their so called expert opinion. —<b> [[User:Harshil169|<i style="color:orange; font-family:Brush Script MT">Harshil </i>]]</b><sup>[[User Talk:Harshil169|want to talk?]]</sup> 04:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
::::It’s really useless to argue when user says {{tq|"If it wasn't appropriate for one article, it's not appropriate for any article on Wikipedia." }} Atleast, they should know about context and meaning before giving their so called expert opinion. —<b> [[User:Harshil169|<i style="color:orange; font-family:Brush Script MT">Harshil </i>]]</b><sup>[[User Talk:Harshil169|want to talk?]]</sup> 04:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::{{ping|Harshil169}} I am curious as to what is the difference of posting the sarcastic dig here versus on the prior article that was attempted to post on? I don't think it is required here. Also, there have been many instances where you have been violating WP:CIVIL with your tone and language towards other editors. This should be addressed to admins for grounds of blocking in my opinion. [[User:Apollo1203|Apollo1203]] ([[User talk:Apollo1203|talk]]) 05:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:14, 15 November 2019
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Real name
Somebody added "Moraridas Hariyani" as Morari Bapu's "real" name, but did not provide a source for that name. All material added to Wikipedia must be backed up by a reliable source. Otherwise, any user is free to remove that information, which is exactly what I did. However, User:Vishmaster has now twice reverted my removals. Does anybody have a reliable source for Moraridas Hariyani being Morari Bapu's real name? If so, then please add it to the article. A piece of information as important as his real name must be well-sourced. --Hnsampat (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I have added back his real name Moraridas Prabhudas Hariyani as is evident from the website referred and cited. Also removed the citation needed tag for birth-date, which is clearly mentioned as September 25, 1946 in the referred site, with his childhood name as Moraridas, Father's name as Prabhudas Hariyani and mother's name as Savitriben Hariyani. Thus making his complete name as Moraridas Prabhudas Hariyani. Further, the website also mentions that he has been started as lovingly called Bapu, which is generally called honorific title for any respected or fatherly persons usually called in Gujarat and other states like Rajasthan, etc. For example Gandhiji was also called Bapu. Simliarly, in British India : heads of Princely states or big Jamindars or Village Head were also called Bapu as a mark of respect in Gujarat and even today continued to be called so in rural Gujarat.--Hardyraj (talk) 17:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Morari Bapu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131221140038/http://moraribapu.org/moraribapu_biography.html to http://www.moraribapu.org/moraribapu_biography.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120718090312/http://profiles.incredible-people.com/sant-morari-bapu/ to http://profiles.incredible-people.com/sant-morari-bapu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted content by IP addresses
If you guys would like to discuss why you think the (reliable and sourced) content you keep deleting from this page should be removed, then please feel free to do so. Repeated vandalism is not a useful edit or discussion, however. PotentPotables (talk) 14:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Removal of Sarcastic Dig at Swaminarayan
@Harshil169: The rationale for not incorporating the sarcastic dig at Swaminarayan has been well-established on this thread with consensus. If it wasn't appropriate for one article, it's not appropriate for any article on Wikipedia. Moksha88 (talk) 03:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Contexts are different. It was not criticism but it deserves mention on BLP. Pinging @Nizil Shah: for 3O. Useless to argue with person here who don’t have understanding of policy and context. Next time when you revert sourced content then seek consensus on relevant talk page first. — Harshil want to talk? 03:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Moksha88:, both article are different and has different context. It should be kept IMO. @Harshil169:,
useless to argue...
are poor choice of words. Should be in more polite words. Regards, Nizil (talk) 04:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)- It’s really useless to argue when user says
"If it wasn't appropriate for one article, it's not appropriate for any article on Wikipedia."
Atleast, they should know about context and meaning before giving their so called expert opinion. — Harshil want to talk? 04:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC) - @Harshil169: I am curious as to what is the difference of posting the sarcastic dig here versus on the prior article that was attempted to post on? I don't think it is required here. Also, there have been many instances where you have been violating WP:CIVIL with your tone and language towards other editors. This should be addressed to admins for grounds of blocking in my opinion. Apollo1203 (talk) 05:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- It’s really useless to argue when user says
- @Moksha88:, both article are different and has different context. It should be kept IMO. @Harshil169:,
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Gujarat articles
- Low-importance Gujarat articles
- Start-Class Gujarat articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Gujarat articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class Hinduism articles
- Unknown-importance Hinduism articles