User talk:Dtt1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:02, 25 July 2020

રાકેશ ઉપાધ્યાય

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page રાકેશ ઉપાધ્યાય to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. John B123 (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Seems like we did things the parallel, mind removing the CSD warning from my talk page since I draftified the article. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris I was just about to remove that notice from your talk page and wanted to ask you if i could copy your user page context What About Us I am a crazy jackson fan too. Thanks Dtt1 (talk) 11:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dtt1, Fixed, I don’t mind anyone copying my userpage at all. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris, Thanks.Dtt1 (talk) 11:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Britto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Britto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Britto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 09:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake with deletion

Hi,

This is regarding the article Trumpler 27-1. You nominated this article for deletion because it 'didn't possess content', when it clearly does. This must have been a mistake. Please rethink your nomination, and if it helps, take another look at the article.

Thanks,

PNSMurthy (talk) 09:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PNSMurthy: was thinking about the same, thanks for confirming it, was going to revoke the nomination anyway.Dtt1^Talk 09:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay, everyone makes mistakes:)PNSMurthy (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Protea caespitosa (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

One copy of the page on this species with no taxobox and in need of copy-editing is enough. The species is notable, but the page needs work. If the creation of pages that are need of editing continues, a block or a topic-ban may be necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Protea caespitosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Protea caespitosa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dtt1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A1 tagging

Hello Dtt1, just wanted to leave you a message regarding a speedy deletion tag you placed on Dilstacks. According to the WP:A1 criterion, you shouldn't place the speedy deletion tag within a few minutes of the article being created. The creator might still be working on the article so it is best to give them some time to develop the article further. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LuK3 hey, I am aware of that, but sometime you know by watching the editor account and the style of editing that if they are doing some sensible editing or are just going for a test page. This was among them. ThanksDtt1^Talk 13:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richa Negi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richa Negi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richa Negi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Harsh (talk) 07:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Spindoctor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Spindoctor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spindoctor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMySon 16:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Hello, thank you for your change. The style of the title caught my attention, I'm glad you like it: D --𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ ^Heyyo? 17:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dicayes Hey is that style yours? I mean you have the copyright to it? I won't mind giving the credit :) Thanks Dtt1^Talk 20:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dtt1 Hahah it's not a problem man, I'm kidding: D --𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ ^Heyyo? 10:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruturaj Singh

Dhanush sun mere bhai link vgera check krle sahi toh hai aur news coverage b hai toh kya dikkat hai delete krne mai Ruturaj Sinh vale page p yeh smj nhi arha mujhe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samer rizvi (talk • contribs) 19:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyu bol nhi skte? Dekhlo dhyan se link hai refrence k liye vo sahi hi hai galt nhi hai bro Samer rizvi (talk) 08:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: July 2020 bitcoin scam

Hello Dtt1, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of July 2020 bitcoin scam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GeneralNotability thanks for the suggestion, but would you mind checking this page too which just got created? 2020 Twitter Bitcoin scam, Both are about the same thing. I have also raised a request here though Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naypta Thanks Dtt1^Talk 22:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dtt1, the other article has sufficient context to not be A3-eligible, and that wasn't sockpuppetry. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GeneralNotability Yeah that is why I contributed in the one which looked ok and was asking this to be deleted, Although thanks for checking out the sockpuppetry case too. Dtt1^Talk 22:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dtt1, you dropped a final warning for vandalism to an editor who does not appear to be one. Which edit was it about? I am also concerned that you CSDed their article within 5 minutes of creation when it was obviously a work in progress (and did not have any problematic content that needed to be immediately purged). Please give articles time to develop before you tag them. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Usedtobecool actually as he has created the page Jeetu Nepal at first it seemed to be a Csd case and he was removing the csd tag instead of improving the page, then i placed the warning tag on his talk page later when i searches for the subject more I felt like the page doesn't deserve a CSD so I did withdraw the csd and improvised the page. as you can check this in the History of the page. Thanks. --Dtt1^Talk 08:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a CSD template is not vandalism; notice how Barkeep49 did not drop you a level 5 vandalism warning in the section below this one? If you can't find the right template, you should use a custom message, a personal custom message is more friendly almost always, in any case. I'd advise you to revert yourself. The user is in an impossible situation without your help. Leaving the message as is gives everyone the impression that they were an egregious vandal who almost got blocked for it, removing it themself would be seen as an attempt to hide the record of their wrongdoing. Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And, as I said in my last message, please give articles time to develop before you tag them for deletion; you could wait 20-30 mins or review the creator's contributions to see whether they have moved on to doing something else or have made no further edits suggesting they might still be working on the next substantial edit to the same article. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion removal

Please don't remove speedy deletion tags on articles you've created as you did at Qyuki Digital Media. I agree with you it does not qualify for speedy deletion given its two clearly notable co-founders but if you want to contest a speedy deletion on an article you've created the proper way is to use the blue button not to just remove the tag. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

	My favorite Wikipedian
	Thank you! You have told me that my article was up for Speedy Deletion! This may not sound good, but I'm glad you told me. imissedu 13:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 Please don't remove speedy deletion tags on articles you've created as you did at [[Qyuki Digital Media]]. I agree with you it does not qualify for speedy deletion given its two clearly notable co-founders but if you want to contest a speedy deletion on an article you've created the proper way is to use the blue button not to just remove the tag. Thanks, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 15:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
+== Thanks! ==
+{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
+|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Trophy.png|100px]]
+|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''My favorite Wikipedian'''
+|-
+|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you! You have told me that my article was up for Speedy Deletion! This may not sound good, but I'm glad you told me. imissedu 13:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
+|}