Jump to content

Talk:Marv Albert: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
note about blp tags.
Line 71: Line 71:
Why don't you put under in the Catgories people charged with sexual assault? Or something like that?
Why don't you put under in the Catgories people charged with sexual assault? Or something like that?
Is it because he's a Jew?
Is it because he's a Jew?

== Remove BLP tags==
I am going to remove the blp tags and remove the headings about being ousted from NBC. In addition, probably remove the unsourced note about the Simpsons as it doesn't seem terribly relevant. --[[User:Rocksanddirt|Rocksanddirt]] ([[User talk:Rocksanddirt|talk]]) 18:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:20, 4 September 2020

clarification needed

The article states:

"However with the Nets struggling this season, the Nets management relegated Albert to secondary play-by-play, to avoid a similar incident while Albert was with the Knicks."

What incident? 65.0.121.109 (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't really one incident. It was that MSG owner James Dolan wants his announcers to play the fans for fools and never point out the obvious when either the Knicks and Rangers are playing bad. If the Knicks lost by 34 points, Dolan wanted the announcers to talk about a Knicks getting 12 rebounds. Marv Albert refused to pander. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.245.177 (talk) 06:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

what does serve up a facial mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.188.56.238 (talk) 02:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In basketball terms a facial is an emphatic blocked shot.

Double standard for different celebrities...

For some reason, it was decided that Erin Brokovitch's bio would not contain any mention of her DUI arrest, even though she is famous for making others pay for breaking the law, and putting people in danger. Even though her arrest shows her to be a hypocrite as she felt that it was OK to do something that kills so many people very year and injures so many more, it was ruled that it is not something that belongs on her bio. So how come Marv Albert's arrest belongs when it has absolutely no connection to why he is famous? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.245.177 (talk) 06:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're confused. An arrest for misdemeanor DUI is a trivial matter compared with prosecution for felony rape. Moreover, Albert was a huge public figure whose sexual assault case was widely reported. Thus it is noteworthy and appropriate to be contained in a biographical article about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.242.248.88 (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marv Albert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"tests proved that the bite marks were his"

I don't know if this falls under original research, but I feel after watching John Oliver's talk, not withstanding Albert's subsequent confession, can the statement "tests proved that the bite marks were his" really be made?!? --Zaurus (talk) 00:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marv Albert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you put under in the Catgories people charged with sexual assault?

Why don't you put under in the Catgories people charged with sexual assault? Or something like that? Is it because he's a Jew?

Remove BLP tags

I am going to remove the blp tags and remove the headings about being ousted from NBC. In addition, probably remove the unsourced note about the Simpsons as it doesn't seem terribly relevant. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]