Talk:Aubrey Plaza: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:49, 17 October 2020

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy B‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://nymag.com/arts/tv/features/aubrey-plaza-2012-5/ Aubrey Plaza’s Perfect Game - New York Magazine

super hot

that she is, but isnt that an opinion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.110.161 (talk) 01:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simply recent vandalism. It's been removed. Elizium23 (talk) 03:01, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fappening pictures

should they be mentionend? the fappening does have an article of its own and with the media coverage the event is definitly noteworthy but should there be any reference to it in the article? on one side, she never made a comment about the authenticity of the pictures (to my knowledge at least) but there is strong evidence in the pictures themselves, not to mention the fact that despite usually sending multiple messages a day via twitter, she didnt send a single one in over a week. sure, she didnt confirm anything, but she didnt deny it either and stayed completely silent following the leak. what do you think? --92.193.100.5 (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unless you can find a number of reliable sources DP76764 (Talk) 17:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there has since been a number of major news outlets mentioning this, however I think the key might be gauge how other articles related to so-called "Fappening" victims are treated. So far the only individual to widely address the images in media is Jennifer Lawrence, while a few others have either shrugged it off or made brief statements and then moved on. The question is, while the leak is notable, having been covered in major media worldwide, is individual "involvement" notable enough? Same goes for the follow up "Snappening" leak. The leak is notable, but is individual involement? 68.146.52.234 (talk) 19:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aubrey Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120216213740/http://www.blackbookmag.com:80/nightlife/track-list-aubrey-plaza-rocks-the-boat-1.21149 to http://www.blackbookmag.com/nightlife/track-list-aubrey-plaza-rocks-the-boat-1.21149

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual orientation

Although Plaza does state that she is attracted to men and women, the source listed doesn't actually state her calling herself bisexual. The LGBT categories at the bottom of the article are fine, but the bisexual categories aren't quite valid unless she flat-out states that she is bisexual. There are a lot of people who appear to swing both ways but still choose not to label themselves; for more information, read this. (Incidentally, other entertainers who fall into this category include Jackie Cruz and Asa Akira.) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 10:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:OCEGRS her sexual orientation does not have a significant bearing on her career, so I would remove those categories. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Can someone remove the biographical information? Ren5631 (talk) 02:01, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ren5631: Now that we've edit protected the article to stop the IPs and you from doing exactly that without explanation, it would seem logical that we might want a reason why. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

World of Warcraft

I first learnt of Aubrey Plaza via World of Warcraft advertising alongside Mr T, William Shatner, Chuck Norris, van Damme, et al. Is her endorsement worth mentioning? 49.180.142.155 (talk) 05:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subject's self-statement of identity

199.119.235.148/199.7.157.29 removed the material as "rambling".[1]

I reverted feeling that the material is relevant and that addressing "rambling" should be more selective.

199.119.235.148/199.7.157.29 restored their edit, saying it was "somebody"'s and giving a rambling explanation too long to fit in the edit summary.[2]

You boldly edited the article. I reverted. The next step is to discuss the issue, not restore it claiming to be another person. This is the Bold-revert-discuss cycle.

The brief quote goes to public discussion of the subjects sexuality and identity. Yes, it is a direct quote: Wikipedia demands that we use self identification.

Did I remove some other material? Probably. I'm not looking it up as it is not relevant to whether or not this should be included. (After this is resolved, I'll take a look at the past relationships currently in there.) - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transient Ischemic Attack

I propose the removal of the line "She has never fully recovered." in the "Early life and education" section pertaining to her transient ischemic attack. It is unclear whether the comment refers to the stroke she had when she was 20, or if it refers to the transient ischemic attack that happened on "Parks and Recreation". Transient ischemic attacks by definition fully resolve (hence, transient). The article used as a citation (https://delawaretoday.com/life-style/aubrey-plaza-of-nbcs-parks-and-recreation-wilmington-native-is-building-a-buzz-in-hollywood/) for this line reports "She has no residual effects, and doctors don’t really know what caused the stroke." It seems like the statement in question is documented to be untrue.

In the third source (the Kevin Nealon video), she says that she has had some pauses in her speech since the stroke when she was 20, but that most people don't know that the pauses are related to that event. At a minimum, we should rephrase the statement to describe the residual speech issue versus letting the reader guess as to the extent of the residual effects. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I reviewed the Kevin Nealon video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XpTJqNbNIk), and she discusses the stroke at 12:20. She states "I had a stroke at 20, and ever since then words just come to me differently." Although this can be construed as never recovering, Kevin Nealon asks about her symptoms (at 13:39) "How long did that last?" and she responds "A couple days, but I'm fine now." I agree with you that there is probably a better way to characterize this than saying "She has never fully recovered", and even just the removal of the sentence would be sufficient.

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 I propose the removal of the line "She has never fully recovered." in the "Early life and education" section pertaining to her transient ischemic attack.  It is unclear whether the comment refers to the stroke she had when she was 20, or if it refers to the transient ischemic attack that happened on "Parks and Recreation".  Transient ischemic attacks by definition fully resolve (hence, transient).  The article used as a citation (https://delawaretoday.com/life-style/aubrey-plaza-of-nbcs-parks-and-recreation-wilmington-native-is-building-a-buzz-in-hollywood/) for this line reports "She has no residual effects, and doctors don’t really know what caused the stroke."  It seems like the statement in question is documented to be untrue.
 :In the third source (the Kevin Nealon video), she says that she has had some pauses in her speech since the stroke when she was 20, but that most people don't know that the pauses are related to that event. At a minimum, we should rephrase the statement to describe the residual speech issue versus letting the reader guess as to the extent of the residual effects. [[User:Larry Hockett|Larry Hockett]] ([[User talk:Larry Hockett|Talk]]) 20:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
+::Thanks for the response.  I reviewed the Kevin Nealon video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XpTJqNbNIk), and she discusses the stroke at 12:20.  She states "I had a stroke at 20, and ever since then words just come to me differently."  Although this can be construed as never recovering, Kevin Nealon asks about her symptoms (at 13:39) "How long did that last?" and she responds "A couple days, but I'm fine now."  I agree with you that there is probably a better way to characterize this than saying "She has never fully recovered", and even just the removal of the sentence would be sufficient.