Jump to content

User talk:PCN02WPS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Readyplayer2 (talk | contribs) at 05:27, 9 March 2021 (→‎Your GA nomination of Andorra at the 2010 Winter Olympics). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

MOS:TIME

In case you missed it, MOS:TIME actually says "Usually, use noon and midnight rather than 12 pm and 12 am". In prose, I would agree with you that the word “noon” reduces ambiguity, but in the box scores used in NFL season articles, the context is enough to let the reader know the game didn’t kick off at midnight, and it’s more important to keep consistency in the way we present all times, rather than satisfying a MOS guideline. – PeeJay 14:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PeeJay, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League#Manual of Style fixes reverted. Thanks. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 14:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The College football Barnstar
For your diligent and timely editing of articles relating to the 2020–21 NCAA football bowl games. Thank you! Dmoore5556 (talk) 07:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dmoore5556 – my friend, you deserve this just as much as I do. Thanks so much for all of your help this season in keeping everything up to date and looking good, and I'm looking forward to (hopefully) working on the spring FCS season in the coming months! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 07:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Presenting a question

Hi, you created the impeachment vote table. I'm probably being very dense, but could you please tell me what the "Present" column is? Thanks. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 19:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mandarax, no worries! House members can vote "yea", "nay", or "present" on bills and HRs and such, and voting "present" is essentially is a way of abstaining (i.e. not voting yes or no), with the other way being to not vote at all. It's explained in a touch more detail at Abstention#International and national parliamentary procedures. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I was obviously unaware of the difference between "present" and "not voting". Thank you very much for taking the time to explain! MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 21:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 2021 College Football Playoff National Championship

Hello! Your submission of 2021 College Football Playoff National Championship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Binksternet (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

The Friendship Barnstar
Nice to meet you. ―Buster7  22:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Buster7, thank you, and likewise! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gilgal, Kentucky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gilgal, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilgal, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm Talk 01:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Langstaff, Kentucky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Langstaff, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langstaff, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Timeline of the Joe Biden presidency (2021 Q4)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Timeline of the Joe Biden presidency (2021 Q4). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 30#Timeline of the Joe Biden presidency (2021 Q4) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tomtown, Kentucky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomtown, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomtown, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm Talk 19:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Leagues Project

Hi PCN02WPS, this is BeanieFan11, I just want to tell you that the Minor Leagues Project I made doesn't look like it will be made. Since 3 users have opposed and it is kind of covered at the main football project (WikiProject American football). Most likely, it's just going to be done in my userspace at User:BeanieFan11/American Football Minor Leagues Project. Unless a we make it a sub-project or task force of WikiProject American football. One other thing I wanted to ask you, just to get another user's opinion, do you think Josh Day is notable. I didn't find much information on him and he didn't actually play in the NFL. Do you think it should be nominated or proposed for deletion? Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) 01:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BeanieFan11 - unfortunate that the minor leagues football project won't make it but I totally understand the rationale brought up by those that opposed. I'd be more than happy to work on it with you as a task force under WP American football, if you'd want to do that. As for Josh Day, I'd PROD it, as it appears to fail WP:NGRIDIRON (as he didn't actually play in a NFL game), and WP:NCOLLATH (as he unambiguously fails criteria 1, 2, 4, and 5, and I'd say 3 as well as the most notability he got was a MWC preseason second-team spot and his team's MVP award for the year). Honestly, it's close to being eligible for a BLPPROD, given that the one and only reference on the page, an external link, doesn't seem to work anymore, but I'd use NGRIDIRON and NCOLLATH to be safe. I'll endorse the PROD once you put the tag on it. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, I just want to let you know that I just put the PROD tag on the Josh Day article. I did find one source for him (https://csurams.com/sports/football/roster/josh-day/1242). The information about him seems to be mostly a copy of this, except that I didn't see it say he was the team MVP on this. For the project, I would like to do a task force with you. I just need to read some more about task forces before I can create it. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) 16:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11, I have endorsed the PROD and left a notice on the article creator's talk page. I'll look into task forces, I don't know what the protocol for creating them is, but I'll see what I can find out. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 17:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

Thank you for the help with the link in the Rose Bowl article. 1Luca2 (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1Luca2, anytime! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 07:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jacqueline Shumiatcher

On 3 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jacqueline Shumiatcher, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Dumelow (talk) 10:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Maureen Colquhoun

On 3 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maureen Colquhoun, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 22:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Dustin Diamond

On 3 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dustin Diamond, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 22:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Simeon Nyachae

On 3 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Simeon Nyachae, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 22:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Wayne Terwilliger

On 4 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Wayne Terwilliger, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN talk

Hey PCN02WPS! Noticed that you added the ITN talk banner for Wayne Terwilliger. Just FYI, to complete the banner you should grab the oldid from the end of the URL of the appropriate edit from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&action=history, that way there is a direct link to the specific update to ITN for the article. Cheers. - Indefensible (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefensible, thanks for bringing that to my attention! I'll be sure to do that in the future. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dustin Diamond

In addition to the ITN recognition above, I wanted to say thanks for putting the work in on Dustin Diamond many of these biography articles never make it specifically because of unreferenced lists. If there were a barnstar for such things, I'd award it to you. Nice job, and cheers. --LaserLegs (talk) 14:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LaserLegs, Thank you! He seemed like a fairly notable person, so I figured he deserved to be on the main page. I appreciate the kind words. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl

Please cite your Super Bowl stats, otherwise it's (almost) ready to post to the Main Page. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 03:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John M Wolfson, just added the citations. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, just add the Bucc stats and we should be good. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 03:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
John M Wolfson, just got them up! Let me know if anything else needs adding. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ideally cite this paragraph as well: As defending Super Bowl Champions, the Kansas City Chiefs recorded an NFL-best 14–2 record in 2020 under eighth year head coach Andy Reid. Other than a 40–32 loss against the Las Vegas Raiders in week 4, their only defeat was in the final game of the season, when they rested most of their starters because they had already clinched the #1 seed in the playoffs. This appearance will be the Chiefs' fourth trip to the Super Bowl. They lost Super Bowl I (1967), but won Super Bowls IV (1970) and LIV (2020). Otherwise it's perfect. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 03:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Super Bowl LV

On 8 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Super Bowl LV, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 03:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go team! – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 03:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am giving credit on behalf of the posting admin. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kadir Topbaş

On 18 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kadir Topbaş, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 16:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2021 Australian Open

On 21 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Australian Open, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 US Open (tennis)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 US Open (tennis) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sportsfan77777, thanks for volunteering to review this! This is my first GA nom, so I apologize if I need a little more working-with than normal, but I'm willing to put in the work to get it there! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 US Open (tennis)

The article 2020 US Open (tennis) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2020 US Open (tennis) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sportsfan77777, thanks again for taking the time to review the article. I will most likely get around to the changes between Monday and Wednesday this week. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andorra at the 2010 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andorra at the 2010 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andorra at the 2010 Winter Olympics for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andorra at the 2010 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andorra at the 2010 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 10:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:11TeamBracket-HorizonLeagueBasketball fixing

Hello, I have another bracket that needs to get fixed: 2021 Horizon League Women's Basketball Tournament, this is an 11 team bracket: Template:11TeamBracket-HorizonLeagueBasketball, and the Detroit Mercy Titans opted out due to COVID-19 issues, can you please get the bracket fixed as soon as you can? Thanks!Readyplayer2 (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]