Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Plastikspork (talk | contribs) at 21:42, 27 February 2022 (Template:TopicTOC-Philosophy: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untranscluded and I see no reason for this to exist as it seems to be humorous, but was apparently used in a serious manner. It was substed a few times but it's entirely redundant to Template:uw-vandal3. The added message doesn't even make sense as the creator/user, usernamekiran, was never an admin. eviolite (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Caracas Metro. Gonnym (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Useddenim (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by MSGJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All categories this was used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Unused. Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women uses different tabs. Gonnym (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women uses different tabs. Gonnym (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused on Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Folklore 2020 and seeing as how all but 1 links is on commons, also unuseful. Gonnym (talk) 11:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intel and really also unnecessary. Gonnym (talk) 11:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the categories this was used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-page of Template:WikiProject Grenada/TFtext. Gonnym (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. The proper template is Template:WikiProject Internet culture. Gonnym (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template which even if it were used as a subst only should really not exist. If a person is mentioned in a (very specific) WikiProject discussion they should just be mentioned (@) there. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No such WikiProject. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Gilgit-Baltistan was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table templates. Gonnym (talk) 11:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old(?) version of Template:WP Malta Collaboration (topic). Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar from 2017 relating to Sri Lanka. Seems unfinished. Nigej (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teams that finished 11th and 24th in the recent 2022 European Men's Handball Championship. Previous consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 6#Template:Angola Squad 2002 FIBA World Championship, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 29#Template:Slovenia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship, (and at other TfDs noted in these articles) was that these sort of templates should be restricted to medal-winning teams. Nigej (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused station template. Gonnym (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused document template. 132.147.87.52 (talk) 16:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Routemap for a proposed extension to Green Line (Luas)#Planned developments, unused there. Nigej (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for Lushoto District in Tanzania but only one of the 28 wards has an article. Nigej (talk) 18:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Table of literacy rates in Pakistan by district in 2017. Education in Pakistan#Literacy rate would be the obvious place for it, but that already has "Literacy rate by Province" and this table doesn't seem suitable. Nigej (talk) 18:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out-of-date content already at High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy#Appointments. Nigej (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. The only edit was creation in 2020 by an editor with exactly two contributions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. I may be mistaken, but it appears that this subpage was an experiment that was never included in the parent page, or included only for a short time. If I am wrong, please enlighten me and I will be happy to document the page so that it does not show up on unused template reports. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It doesn't look like this was ever used. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not usable. Parent template uses the standard {{Railway-routemap}} for its documentation instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not usable, because the parent template uses a shared documentation template, {{Documentation constellation navbox}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The parent page is a soft redirect that does not need documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Route of the Jaipur Superfast Express. Not used there. Surely a list of stations that a train stops at is not useful. Nigej (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. Created one month ago, and still has only red links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Munich U-Bahn rail templates, presumably updated to use {{Adjacent stations}} in relevant articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The module which replaced these is Module:Adjacent stations/Munich U-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template is empty, save for a redirect, and hasn't been edited in over 6 months. Not sure what the intention was. It was being used on Shimon Abuhatzira. SWinxy (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Delete, or merge with {{Rivers and lakes in Azerbaijan}}, which is used in most or all of the articles linked here, even articles that are not linked from the target navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Surplus to {{Joondalup Line}} which is used at Joondalup Line. Nigej (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A top, orange banner is not something we use here on en.wiki in main space articles. The template should be deleted from the pages it's on, allowing the standard ToC to be used. Template:Philosophy sidebar or Template:Philosophy topics can be added to any of the pages that still need a navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 20:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on only one article, Glossary of philosophy. Template:Philosophy sidebar already has that link and is used on that page. Gonnym (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).