Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deema Shehabi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deema Shehabi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A published poet. She does not appear to have satisfied WP:AUTHOR or WP:BIO. Being nominated for a "Pushcart Prize" without having won any major prize does not seem sufficient. Edison (talk) 19:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Although I placed the stub to replace an article deleted by copyvio, I had doubts about the notability myself at the time (expressed in the template). :) Honestly, I suspect this would have been a successful PROD. But in case it matters to anyone, these are links that were in the now-deleted version:

A number of those links are now dead, but I think there's nothing in there that secures notability myself. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reworked the piece. Since the stub was written, she has published 3 books, served as VP of Radius of Arab-American Writers, Inc. and clearly meets GNG at the very least. SusunW (talk) 01:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article has certainly been improved compared to before. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep given more recent activities and the work of SusunW . --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.