User talk:Rosedaler
Note: this user is autoconfirmed.
Welcome!
Hello, Rosedaler! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking ![]() |
---|
|
|
September 2022
Hello! I'm RTao. Your recent edit(s) to the page Autostereoscopy appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RTao (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for pointing this out. I re-did the edit with an added source. Rosedaler (talk) 03:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Please respect national varieties of dates
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Jeffrey Dahmer. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.
For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.
If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. MarconiCheese (talk) 16:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi. I have left a comment about this on your talk page. Rosedaler (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- I moved your commentary to the article talk page, where it belongs. MarconiCheese (talk) 18:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
"Incorrect notice""?
Rosedaler, there wasn't anything "incorrect" (or inappropriate) about my placement of the WP:ACDS GENSEX notice since you have edited concerning one or more topics to which that set of sanctions applies. The notice doesn't imply (and is fairly explicit that it doesn't imply) any problems with your editing of these topics. Also, the effect of the notice is not reduced in any way if you feel it to be "incorrect" and/or remove it from your page. Please let me know if any of this seems unclear to you. Happy editing. :) Newimpartial (talk) 18:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi. I saw something about controversies in the notice, and I felt that the notice was not matching my activity on Wikipedia. I want to stay far away from any controversies. I just want to contribute and make language clearer in some articles. Rosedaler (talk) 23:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Which is fine, but your edits to Cisgender, Gender studies and Transgender are definitely within the domain of the notice. Just letting you know. Newimpartial (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Rosedaler. Thank you for creating Vergence-accommodation conflict. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
![]() |
Thanks for creating Vergence-accommodation conflict! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
List of geolocation-based video games moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of geolocation-based video games, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 04:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
List of geolocation-based video games moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of geolocation-based video games, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'll add more sources. But please let me know before moving the article back to draft space if you do it again. Rosedaler (talk) 10:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Good, but please do not just cut and past the article back into the main space, another editor will review it and take care of that side of it. This may take some time. If you cut and paste it back into the mainspace you are just creating extra unnecessary work for other editors. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's a pretty simple list article. I'm citing the same sources that have already been cited on their respective wikipedia article pages. There isn't much to review. I am still planning to move it back to article space once I have added all the sources properly. Rosedaler (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also I'm not cutting and pasting. I'm using the "move tool". Rosedaler (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also please see my comment on your talk page about this Rosedaler (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes I can see you are an autoconfirmed user, but that means you should have not published an article without proper referencing in the first place. Hughesdarren (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- My bad Rosedaler (talk) 11:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- But you have now cut and pasted the text from draft back into the mainspace again. Now the article exists both is draft and mainspace. Should I redirect it back to draft for you or will you clean up this mess yourself? Hughesdarren (talk) 11:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'll take care of it. thx Rosedaler (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes I can see you are an autoconfirmed user, but that means you should have not published an article without proper referencing in the first place. Hughesdarren (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also please see my comment on your talk page about this Rosedaler (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also I'm not cutting and pasting. I'm using the "move tool". Rosedaler (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's a pretty simple list article. I'm citing the same sources that have already been cited on their respective wikipedia article pages. There isn't much to review. I am still planning to move it back to article space once I have added all the sources properly. Rosedaler (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Good, but please do not just cut and past the article back into the main space, another editor will review it and take care of that side of it. This may take some time. If you cut and paste it back into the mainspace you are just creating extra unnecessary work for other editors. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Rosedaler. Thank you for creating Geolocation-based video game. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of geolocation-based video games. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, this was a draft that I started and published into main space. I copied and pasted because another user kept moving my article back into draft space. But all of the edits were just my own edits for the one day where I was making the article. Rosedaler (talk) 04:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with SteamVR. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- This circumstance warrants removing the notice, as it was added in error. I'd like to close the discussion but it's not clear how I can go about doing that. Rosedaler (talk) 07:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- How do I close an AfD that was started in error? Rosedaler (talk) 07:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- You could close by clicking preferences, then go to the gadgets section, before adding XFD closer. However, because you converted the redirect to the article closing so would be considered an inappropriate non-admin close that would be likely overturned at DRV. Thanks! VickKiang (talk) 07:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Howdy there! I'm going to be blunt: If I see you revert one more editor with a rationale such as "was done in error/mistake", I'll block you. You don't get to decide that other experienced editors have made a mistake in opening a discussion. -- ferret (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't like how you're threatening to block me. The edit was indeed made in error by another user. They believed SteamVR was an abandoned platform when in reality it is currently used by millions of people. This was easily googleable in two seconds. Given this, I also dispute your use of the term "experienced editor." Rosedaler (talk) 16:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant 6 seconds, not 2 seconds. Rosedaler (talk) 17:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, please refer to WP:SENIORITY pertaining to your comment. Rosedaler (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm going to be blunt: In some cases, I do get to decide that other experienced editors have made a mistake in opening a discussion. Rosedaler (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, please refer to WP:SENIORITY pertaining to your comment. Rosedaler (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant 6 seconds, not 2 seconds. Rosedaler (talk) 17:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Furthermore, WP:DNB. Rosedaler (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Rosedaler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked wrongly for reverting bulk edits by another user that kept undoing a lot of work unrelated to their cited reasons for reversion. The diffs for the page are huge, but if you actually look and read them you will understand the situation. I made multiple different types of changes in different places on the article. If the user wanted to revert the part of it they mentioned, they should have copied and pasted it from an older revision, instead of erasing a lot of my other unrelated work as well. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked wrongly for reverting bulk edits by another user that kept undoing a lot of work unrelated to their cited reasons for reversion. The diffs for the page are huge, but if you actually look and read them you will understand the situation. I made multiple different types of changes in different places on the article. If the user wanted to revert the part of it they mentioned, they should have copied and pasted it from an older revision, instead of erasing a lot of my other unrelated work as well. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked wrongly for reverting bulk edits by another user that kept undoing a lot of work unrelated to their cited reasons for reversion. The diffs for the page are huge, but if you actually look and read them you will understand the situation. I made multiple different types of changes in different places on the article. If the user wanted to revert the part of it they mentioned, they should have copied and pasted it from an older revision, instead of erasing a lot of my other unrelated work as well. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Rosedaler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I believe that the person who blocked me did not read the entire edit history. I made changes further down in the article first, and then on a separate occasion made changes to the lead. These are separate changes that do not depend on each other. The user who kept reverting did not take this fact into account, which is the source of the disagreement. During the entire discussion, I have conceded and reinstated most of the content that was contested, as per the edit history. I was blocked wrongly because the user who blocked me did not see the whole story. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe that the person who blocked me did not read the entire edit history. I made changes further down in the article first, and then on a separate occasion made changes to the lead. These are separate changes that do not depend on each other. The user who kept reverting did not take this fact into account, which is the source of the disagreement. During the entire discussion, I have conceded and reinstated most of the content that was contested, as per the edit history. I was blocked wrongly because the user who blocked me did not see the whole story. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe that the person who blocked me did not read the entire edit history. I made changes further down in the article first, and then on a separate occasion made changes to the lead. These are separate changes that do not depend on each other. The user who kept reverting did not take this fact into account, which is the source of the disagreement. During the entire discussion, I have conceded and reinstated most of the content that was contested, as per the edit history. I was blocked wrongly because the user who blocked me did not see the whole story. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Rosedaler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This block violates Blocking policy. I did not break the 3RR. Each time I reverted a bulk edit by the other user, I added most of the disputed content and followed the guidelines from the user that brought up the issues. Some of these edits took two edits to do, which is why some of them look like simple edits that break 3RR. This is only because I didn't know how to get the wikitext of an older revision. I have since then learned how to do this. I maintain that I was wrongly blocked. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=This block violates Blocking policy. I did not break the 3RR. Each time I reverted a bulk edit by the other user, I added most of the disputed content and followed the guidelines from the user that brought up the issues. Some of these edits took two edits to do, which is why some of them look like simple edits that break 3RR. This is only because I didn't know how to get the wikitext of an older revision. I have since then learned how to do this. I maintain that I was wrongly blocked. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=This block violates Blocking policy. I did not break the 3RR. Each time I reverted a bulk edit by the other user, I added most of the disputed content and followed the guidelines from the user that brought up the issues. Some of these edits took two edits to do, which is why some of them look like simple edits that break 3RR. This is only because I didn't know how to get the wikitext of an older revision. I have since then learned how to do this. I maintain that I was wrongly blocked. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Rosedaler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Person who blocked me didn't understand the situation in entirety and blocked me before I could continue the discussion on the associated 3RR page for another user. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Person who blocked me didn't understand the situation in entirety and blocked me before I could continue the discussion on the associated 3RR page for another user. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Person who blocked me didn't understand the situation in entirety and blocked me before I could continue the discussion on the associated 3RR page for another user. [[User:Rosedaler|Rosedaler]] ([[User talk:Rosedaler#top|talk]]) 21:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}