Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:16, 9 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The template has a confusing name as Turkism refers to all Turkic people and is associated to Turkism Day which is celebrated in memory of racist ideologues. Anti Turkish sentiment is a better term, but also this needs to be proven and sourced in the respective articles which currently is not the case at most articles. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. In common sense, anti-Turkism refers to hatred/prejudice towards the Turkish people of Anatolia/Thrace. Khalidi, Libaridian. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 21:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just read the Wikipedia articles Pan-Turkism and Turkism Day. Leading Pan-Turkists wanted to ally themselves with Nazi Germany during World War 2 and Turkism Day is celebrated on the 3 May in memory of reunion of racists on the 3 May 1944. I don't believe Saotura meant to create a template with this confusing name or that they knew what Turkism is associated with.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOSOON for this navbox; only one known tournament linked. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating for deletion. This sidebar/template is only used in one article (Byzantine Greece) and is redundant to the widely used Template:Middle Ages by region. I suspect this is because it's obnoxiously long and would fill a significant amount of space, probably pushing a lot of text and images down. Seeing no reason to keep it around. Aza24 (talk) 07:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 02:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No directly related articles for this to be a worthwhile navigational tool for the band. Two of the band members do have articles but still doesn't seem to meet the threshold of WP:NENAN. EN-Jungwon 06:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All content redirected to author Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EN-Jungwon 06:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Broken and unused map --TheImaCow (talk) 05:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by Fastily. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 00:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, links are included in Template:Stephen King's It --TheImaCow (talk) 05:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, links are included in Template:Japanese Navy short aircraft designations --TheImaCow (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 15. Izno (talk) 22:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 15. Primefac (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 02:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar, contains only one link --TheImaCow (talk) 04:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unfinished navbox. --TheImaCow (talk) 04:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 15. Izno (talk) 22:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, contains only one article. --TheImaCow (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone wants to create a list article or regional navboxes, the entries can be found in Category:Lakes of India. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused list, created by sockpuppet. --TheImaCow (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bonn Stadtbahn and tram templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{s-line}} templates for the Bonn Stadtbahn and Bonn tramways. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Bonn Stadtbahn and Module:Adjacent stations/Trams in Bonn. All transclusions replaced. There are 17 dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 00:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).