Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:51, 10 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

July 3

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 3, 2019.

Ekkusubokkusu

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. Xbox is American, so the English language is the only language with affinity. -- Tavix (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 maps

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ModWar2

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unlikely abbreviation of the title. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - Online Multiplayer

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unlikely redirect due to formatting ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Modern Warfare 2 killstreaks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Remasterd

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unlikely redirect considering it contains both the number "4" (which is not used in the actual title) and has a typo at the end. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Space zombies

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this concept is not NEARLY unique to Call of Duty. See also Space Pirates and Zombies. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New Brunswick Road to Resources

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 15#New Brunswick Road to Resources

Battle of Felucia

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A fictional battle that receives glancing mention in the article (and only in the context of spinoff video games), this redirect title could conceivably impair people looking for Battle of Fallujah. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Biobag

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawing nomination as an editor has provided justification with sources. If an article about the company BioBag is ever created this may need disambiguation down the road, but for now the redirect is fine. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 20:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target, searching online would led me to discover that BioBag is the name of a biodegradable materials company. I would lean toward deletion, but could also see an argument for redirecting to Biodegradable plastic signed, Rosguill talk 18:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an article about the biobag: https://jme.bmj.com/content/44/11/751 It's also discussed here: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15112 (from which the second image of the Wikipedia article comes from) The RedBurn (ϕ) 20:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've added "biobag" in the description of that image. The RedBurn (ϕ) 20:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Overcoat pistol

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 11#Overcoat pistol

Chakravarthy (2016 film)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a 2016 film. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Chakravarthy (2016 film).jpg

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 12#File:Chakravarthy (2016 film).jpg

Pvt.Dimitri petrenko

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unlikely redirect due to strange spacing and capitalization ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nacht Der Untoten (Night of the Undead)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unlikely redirect, this is not how disambiguations are used. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Night of the undead

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Overly vague redirect. Could possibly be confused with Night of the Living Dead. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty (film series)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, we don't yet know if a film series will be completed. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty: Mission Zero

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary redirect, not mentioned on the page at all. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty Video Game Series

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 09:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the all caps make it an unlikely redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, as this does not seem like a harmful redirect. Also, the article on the series was apparently created at this title prior to being moved in 2006, so deletion could break older external links. Geolodus (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It only gets a few hits a month, so I doubt there are any older links going to it, at least ones that are widely used at all. While not harmful, it's of dubious usefulness also.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of characters in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 2

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 13#List of characters in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 2

Missions of Call of Duty

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- per WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty (Deluxe Edition)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unlikely redirect. Disambiguations are not meant to be used in this way. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Callofduty

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary redirect. Unlikely for someone to search for. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty Trickshots

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary redirect, not mentioned at all in article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

COD logic

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - former unencyclopedic page that is not mentioned in the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare: Mobilized

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unlikely redirect. It refers to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare: Mobilized, but the game takes place in the universe of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, not Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:Natacha Atlas

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 12#Category:Natacha Atlas

OmniTech Support

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 12#OmniTech Support

Magic (Marshmello and Sabrina Carpenter song)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a real song and may cause a confusion with the Jauz collaboration. hueman1 (talk) 08:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Goods (generally)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what the disambiguator "(generally)" is meant to refer to, or how its use as a disambiguator makes it a likely search term. Steel1943 (talk) 06:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Confusing, unlikely search term. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 09:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't make any sense as a disambiguation.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as far as I can see, the page "Goods (generally)" was [created as a move of the Good (economics) following the a round-robin move which swapped Good (economics) and Goods. It is unclear to me why such a move needed to be made, and I have now restored that page with history back to the Good (economics) location, where it best belongs. The "generally" page is therefore just a copy of an old redirect that used to be somewhere else, and serves no purpose. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 16:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Amakuru: "...and I have now restored that page with history back to the Good (economics) location, where it best belongs..." What brought you to that conclusion? I explained why I moved the edit history to Goods (disambiguation) in my edit summary when I moved it there ... since the page included history as a disambiguation page. So, if there are two subjects there, rather than reverting what I did and leaving the history broken, split the history and don't leave the wrong edit history in the wrong place, rather than reverting what I did. See here where the history contained a disambiguation page, and literally the next edit that completely changed that situation, which seems to be the "Goods (economics)" you are referring to. Thanks. Steel1943 (talk)
    @Steel1943: OK apologies, I thought the page had some substantive history as an article, which was the reason why it was moved to Goods (generally) in the first place. In fact, there doesn't seem to be any useful content there, and none that it used in any merged articles, so I have split out the parts of the history from when it was a disambiguation page, as you suggest, and moved those back to Goods (disambiguation). Good (economics) is now a newly created redirect. If you see anything else amiss, please let me know.  — Amakuru (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not up to the disambiguation standard. — the Man in Question (in question) 03:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rolling Stone charts

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Redirect has been converted to an article. (Nice work!) --BDD (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Top 100 is just one of 5 new charts by RS, including the Top 200 for albums. JTtheOG (talk) 02:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created the redirect and have no objection to changing it to lead to the 100 Chart as opposed to the Rolling Stone Magazine page. Probably could been done without a discussion as I don't believe there would be any objection from others. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And to clarify, the name should not be deleted just because there are individual charts. That's like deleting Billboard charts because here is a Billboard 200 page. There are a total of five charts so not sure if they really need individual pages. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense to me. The Top 100 and Top 200 are mainly sourced to RS anyways. Most of the available references talk about the charts as a whole. It would likely be better to merge everything into the Charts page until such time the individual charts receive more coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_3&oldid=1138582684"