Jump to content

User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive121

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< User talk:YellowMonkey

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 21 August 2023 (Fix Linter errors. (bogus image options)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Straw poll for selecting photos of cyclists at the 2009 Tour Down Under[edit]

Photos were taken at the team parade at the start of the 2009 Tour Down Under, January 18, 2008.

They were all very gentlemanly. Very dignified and genial. So were the crowd. Apart from the middle-aged man who stood net to the YellowMonkey and intentionally jabbed him in the ribs for about an hour. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The crowd favourites, judged by the decibel level of the applause, were in no particular order, Armstrong, Hincapie, Pereiro, Greipel, Voigt, O'Grady, Michael Rogers, McEwen, Baden Cooke, Bobridge (local boy). YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting section[edit]

Simply vote and comment as follows below the individual sections.

Comment (numbering pictures from 1, 2, 3 etc, left to right) and ~~~~

Poll: Cameron Meyer[edit]

(no previous picture)

No. 2 tossup; not crazy about either. Durova^Charge! 16:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Not crazy about either but have a strong aversion to semi-constipated looks. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - 2 is the better of these. Cirt (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0. Pdfpdf (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --—Sandahl (talk) 23:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No preference. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Lesser of two evils. Sarvagnya 21:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - but it's close. Privatemusings (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1, but cut off the bottom part. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1, with tighter cropping. - Bilby (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2, but it would need cropping. --vi5in^[talk] 23:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. probably Chadsnook (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Davide Malacarne[edit]

(no previous picture)

2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - Best framing of the bunch. Cirt (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. don't like the smile in 2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 4 eyes open, less harsh profile than 1 or 2. Durova^Charge! 05:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Number 4 is best.—Sandahl (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Less grainy. Sarvagnya 21:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 06:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First choice 2, second choice 4, third choice 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 vi5in^[talk] 23:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. 4 looks almost as good. Chadsnook (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Davide Vigano[edit]

versus

4 - Best full expression and view of face. Cirt (talk) 03:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 4 per above. Durova^Charge! 05:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 —Sandahl (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5. Clearer, sharper and frontal enough. Sarvagnya 21:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5 is the best. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5 -- Samir 06:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 vi5in^[talk] 23:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5 hard to choose between 4 and 5, but 5 is clearer. Chadsnook (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Francis van Londersele[edit]

2 - But might want to crop to just the head/shoulders, the hand is a bit bright/blurry. Cirt (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 1 Less open expression, but better lighting and focus. Durova^Charge! 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova.—Sandahl (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Lesser of two evils. Sarvagnya 21:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1, I guess. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Frederick Willems[edit]

1. Although 3 is a better pic, he looks better in 1. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2 the only one with tolerably even lighting. Durova^Charge! 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 because of best lighting.—Sandahl (talk) 05:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 is the lesser of 3 evils. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Lighting. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: George Hincapie[edit]

versus

4. Although there's a hint of a smile in 3, 4 is brighter. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 3 more dynamic composition, better facial expression. Durova^Charge! 05:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 brighter —Sandahl (talk) 02:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 for the profile pic, but you might consider including the last one in the article as well. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 06:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First choice 5, second choice 4. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Y not? 03:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Gert Steegmans[edit]

versus

2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. frontal.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 1 best view of face. Durova^Charge! 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 best angle on face.—Sandahl (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 sorry dude -- Samir 06:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Gianni da Ros[edit]

1. Close call, but looks a bit funny in 2 and has too much armor in 3--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 3 going against the flow here and picking the shot with sunglasses. Although it shows less of the face, the lighting, composition, and color balance is far superior to either alternative. Durova^Charge! 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 could be a little lighter.—Sandahl (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3, despite the glasses and headgear. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Greg Henderson[edit]

3. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 3 Wish you had been standing four feet to the right for this shot. Durova^Charge! 05:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 looks more composed.—Sandahl (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Henrik Redant[edit]

File:Henrik Redant 3.JPG

2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 1 prefer the composition. Close call between all 3 choices. Durova^Charge! 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2, he looks ridiculous in 1. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jacopo Guarnieri[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tough call, but 2 if you crop it. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jesus Hernandez[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jos van Emden[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jose Luis Rubiera[edit]

0. Strange "hat". Is it some form of helmet? Pdfpdf (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1, I guess.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 or none.—Sandahl (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jose Rojas[edit]

4.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 —Sandahl (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 06:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Juan Horrach[edit]

1, I guess.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 face less obscured.—Sandahl (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Julian Dean[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 21:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 09:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Julien el Fares[edit]

1. Nicer smile.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 21:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 09:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jussi Veikkanen[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Kai Reus[edit]

2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1, then 4. Don't like 2; too much crotch prominence.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm. I hadn't noticed - I was looking at the top 2/3 of the picture ... Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 or 4 —Sandahl (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1, 4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Kasper Klostergaard[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 21:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Kenny de Hayes[edit]

3. Don't like the weird look in 1 and the faraway look in 2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Kym Dillon[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 more relaxed looking.—Sandahl (talk) 01:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Lance Armstrong[edit]

2 Not picking anything in his face! Bastique ^demandez
2. First guy here that I heard of.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 23:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~1 for sure~~ 2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Laurent Biondi[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - could be a tighter shot with arm cropped out.—Sandahl (talk) 21:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Laurent Lefevre[edit]

2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. #1 might be placed here.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Luca Barla[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Luis Leon Sanchez[edit]

2 and 3 were the same - 2 replaced with new photo.

3 is wee clearer then 2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Maciej Bodnar[edit]

1 Bastique ^demandez
1. The other at Traffic Cops.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Y not? 03:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Mario Aerts[edit]

2. (However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... ) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Bastique ^demandez
1. Hello! Are you guys blind? Did you not notice the person behind him?--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Pardon? What did you think "(However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... )" was about? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Didn't notice. Musta been distracted by sumtin :D --brew crewer (yada, yada) 17:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4, easy -- Samir 06:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Mark Renshaw[edit]

2 better lighting, pose Bastique ^demandez
2 per above. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2—Sandahl (talk) 01:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Markus Eichler[edit]

2 better quality Bastique ^demandez
2. The other pic might be placed here.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Martin Elmiger[edit]

2 Bastique ^demandez
2 notwithstanding the microphone, it's clearer. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Martin Muller[edit]

2 Both are good but the lighting is better in 2 than 1 Bastique ^demandez
2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 it's a bit brighter.—Sandahl (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Mathew Hayman[edit]

versus

3 Best expression Bastique ^demandez 03:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. I actually suspect his expression doesn't really change. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 is best —Sandahl (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Mathieu Drujon[edit]

1 Great smile Bastique ^demandez 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Matteo Bono[edit]

2 Obstruction in 1 Bastique ^demandez 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Don't like the teeth-situation in 1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Matteo Tosatto[edit]

3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 Great shot --Bastique ^demandez 03:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Looks better in this one.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Matthew Goss[edit]

2 1 is better quality but that tongue ruins it. Bastique ^demandez 03:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per above. 1 might be more a good pic for this article.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per Bastique —Sandahl (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 despite tongue -- Samir 05:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Matt White (cyclist)[edit]

1 Dimensions are terrible on 2. Bastique ^demandez 03:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This guy obviously does not like yellow monkeys.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0 as per brewcrewer Pdfpdf (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
crop 2. -- Y not? 03:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Maxim Iglinskiy[edit]

2 Bastique ^demandez 03:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. The other is too in-your-face.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 looks a little like a mugshot but it's OK.—Sandahl (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Michael Rogers[edit]

1. It is a different pose from nearly all the others. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. This is a wonderful shot. Bastique ^demandez 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 nice shot of profile.—Sandahl (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Mickael Buffaz[edit]

1 Best expression. Bastique ^demandez 03:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Nicki Sorensen[edit]

3 best expression Bastique ^demandez 03:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy makeover -- Y not? 03:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Nicolas Portal[edit]

3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Best face shot. Bastique ^demandez 03:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toss up. Looks better in 1 but 3 is a better pic.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Nicolas Roche[edit]

1 better lighting of the two Bastique ^demandez 03:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Baseball cap hides too much of the other one.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Durova^Charge! 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Nikolay Trusov[edit]

2 Eyes are closed in 1 Bastique ^demandez 03:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 05:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Oscar Pereiro[edit]

3 Bastique ^demandez 03:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3, but I would erase that terrible vertical line with Gimp or Photoshop.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Pablo Lastras[edit]

1 Bastique ^demandez 03:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, 1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Paul Sherwen[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Durova^Charge! 06:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Perrig Quemeneur[edit]

Both are same images –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. ~~No, I changed my mind. Now 2~~. Again 1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0. Hey Brewcrewer, what about #3?? (They all look constipated to me.) Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Marginal preference for 3. Durova^Charge! 06:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
no preference, all the same. ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Perrig Quemeneur - take 2[edit]

Hmmm. Hard one. Either #0 or #2 Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Durova^Charge! 06:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 05:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Pieter Jacobs[edit]

3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 Durova^Charge! 06:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 Cirt (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Rein Taaramae[edit]

Don't like either, but 2 might be good for Cracking joints.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 06:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Phil Liggett[edit]

2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Durova^Charge! 06:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Remy di Gregorio[edit]

2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. The other at overbite.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Crop the bottom third and adjust the levels. Durova^Charge! 05:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Rene Mandri[edit]

2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Durova^Charge! 05:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Rick Flens[edit]

2 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Durova^Charge! 05:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Ronny Scholz[edit]

3 Although the background it too bright, the profile and smile are nicer.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 with levels adjustment. Durova^Charge! 05:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Rony Martias[edit]

1. Less scrunchy.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 better lighting, equally grimaced expression. Durova^Charge! 05:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Scott Davis (cyclist)[edit]

versus

0. Don't like either much, but both are MUCH better the the photo on Scott Davis (cyclist)!! Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (And what's he doing using our Scott's name?!) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gun to my head, I would go with 2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the existing photo. Durova^Charge! 05:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3, sorry -- Samir 05:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3-- Y not? 03:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Sean Yates[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Durova^Charge! 05:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Sergey Klimov[edit]

3 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 Durova^Charge! 05:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Sergio de Lis[edit]

1, –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Durova^Charge! 05:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Stef Clement[edit]

versus

3. The least frowning.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 Durova^Charge! 05:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Cirt (talk) 23:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 05:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Thierry Bricaud[edit]

1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 05:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 23:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Thomas Rohregger[edit]

versus

I think we should stick with the current pic.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Current pic. Durova^Charge! 04:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Cirt (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Sorry dude -- Samir 05:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Timmy Duggan[edit]

Nah.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 04:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Timothy Gudsell[edit]

1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Better smile.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 for the lighting. Durova^Charge! 04:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Tom Leezer[edit]

It's really a toss-up. This is the second toughest decision I've ever made (there was this donuts incident), but I guess I'll go with 1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 04:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it's twins...wait, nevermind. 1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Travis Meyer[edit]

0. (Did he come last?) Pdfpdf (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 04:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 05:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Y not? 15:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Vitaliy Buts[edit]

1 (cropped) –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nice smile! I like all three. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Durova^Charge! 04:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 Cirt (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 05:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Vittorio Algeri[edit]

2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 Durova^Charge! 04:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 04:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Cirt (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 05:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Volodymyr Zagorodniy[edit]

3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Durova^Charge! 04:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 05:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Wesley Sulzberger[edit]

1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 04:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Cirt (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 05:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Willem Stroetinga[edit]

Number 1 -- Samir 07:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 04:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 has better expression. Cirt (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Yoann Offredo[edit]

Number 2 -- Samir 07:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0. Pdfpdf (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Durova^Charge! 04:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 but crop it to head/shoulders. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Alison Carle[edit]

Added at the request of Brewcrewer (talk · contribs) and Pdfpdf (talk · contribs):

1. Obviously. I had some suggestions for the other pic but I'm trying to be a little classy these days.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (Given Brewcrewer's new found predilection towards trying to be a little classy, my safest option is to attempt to refrain from putting my foot in my mouth. Hence, I will make no comment. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- P.S. YellowMonkey: Thanks for the additional photos. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Durova^Charge! 04:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 if you can crop it. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uno -- Samir 05:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YellowMonkey/Archive121&oldid=1171448501"

Hidden category:

Pages with missing files