User talk:Mohit235

Hi Mohit here, feel free to leave a message for me anytime. Thank You.

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Mahesh Pandey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Mahesh Pandey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 12:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Mahesh Pandey, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Mahesh Pandey. Praxidicae (talk) 14:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mahesh Pandey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahesh Pandey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing notices via an IP is socking. Do not do it again. Second, I've moved this to draft space for you to work on. If you move it back to draftspace in it's current form and poorly sourced, it will be deleted, so I suggest you go through the AFC process. Praxidicae (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahesh Pandey (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

the sources are mostly unreliable, cruft or otherwise not coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahesh Pandey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahesh Pandey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohit235! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahesh Pandey has been accepted

Mahesh Pandey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Guroudev Bhalla instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guroudev Bhalla moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Guroudev Bhalla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cabayi (talk) 10:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello Mohit235. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mohit235. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mohit235|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? How can give this statement. I am trying to improve Wikipedia's data and make it more reliable. Just go through my contributions you will find that I have made necessary corrections in the article. People have used wrong names, spelling mistakes for many articles. I am just trying to improve the articles and you are saying that this is strongly discouraged. I wasn't expecting this kind of message from Wikipedia. Mohit235 (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You took a picture of Mr. Bhalla and it is clear that he posed for you. What is your connection with him? 331dot (talk) 11:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Think twice before saying all this rubbish. This image is from a source called `StarsUnfolded'. You may check on the web. Neither he posed for me nor have any connection. Mohit235 (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed the image as your own personal work. If that's not the case, you need to remove the image and immediately request its deletion from Commons. Most random images on the internet do not have a copyright compatible with Wikipedia. If this image is displayed with a copyright that permits its reuse for any purpose with attribution, you may then reupload the image with the appropriate copyright. It must be clearly stated, you cannot assume it is compatible. 331dot (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also claimed this image of Mr. Pandey as your own personal work. 331dot (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are marking Mr. Pandey's image as well? That was clicked by me. Remove its deletion. You can't just assume that my every work is not correct. Mohit235 (talk) 12:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't marked anything for deletion. If you personally took the image of Mr. Pandey, fine. What is your connection with Mr. Pandey, since you were at his event and he posed for you when you took the image?

If you didn't personally take the image of Mr. Bhalla, you need to address that as I have indicated. 331dot (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked from editing if you do not adequately address these concerns. Copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, so we must take copyright matters seriously. 331dot (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources given showing he meets the definition of a notable creative professonal. Things he worked on are listed, but no sources are provided that his influence is what made those programs notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 12:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think now you have problem is just with me. Trying to remove frustration on my work and contributions. Marking the images for deletion. Rejected draft submission. Well done. You don't deserve to be admin. Mohit235 (talk) 12:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not marked a single image for deletion. I have no problem with you personally, I have concerns with policies not being followed. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why you have rejected it. I have seen 100s of articles published worst than this. I have tried my best to give the best sources which describes the subject. Also we shouldn't give citations after every word. According to my knowledge I have given even sources and the best sources. Still you rejected it. If you were a good admin you must have approved it. I have also seen many articles which don't even have 5 relevant sources. Still I provided the best sources. Mohit235 (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see other stuff exists. There are likely tens of thousands of articles that exist that should not- this does not mean that more should be added. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us in many ways, we can only deal with what we know about, when we have time to do it. If you would like to help us out, you can work with us to identify inappropriate articles you have seen for possible action. We need the help.

The draft was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" has a specific meaning in the draft process, that a draft may not be resubmitted. "Declined" means that a draft may be resubmitted if the concerns of the reviewer can be addressed. You need to show that Mr. Bhalla meets the special definition of a notable creative professional through summarizing what independent reliable sources say is important/significant/influential about him and his work. You did a great job documenting his body of work- but that by itself does not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any major changes I can make to the draft now. Because I have given the best sources. You can let me know the exact steps/sources to remove or add. Then I will resubmit and can you check. Mohit235 (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need independent reliable sources that discuss his importance as a director and/or producer. Steven Spielberg merits an article because many independent sources discuss his contributions to the world of filmmaking and what makes those important. The article about him does not just list his work. 331dot (talk) 12:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't add 200-300 links but as suggested by you, I have found 2 links which describes Mr. Bhalla completely. I am putting that in my draft and resubmitting. You can have a check. Thanks Mohit235 (talk) 12:27, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let others check it. 331dot (talk) 12:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Mohit235 (talk) 12:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if you personally took the image of Mr. Pandey, fine. What is your connection with Mr. Pandey, since you were at his event and he posed for you when you took the image? If you didn't personally take the image of Mr. Bhalla, you need to address that as I have indicated. You will be blocked from editing if you do not adequately address these concerns. Copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, so we must take copyright matters seriously. 331dot (talk) 12:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There will be no copyright issue. I was a visitor at the BFM and clicked the picture. For Mr. Bhalla the source I have used is one I know. Hence I haven't done anything wrong. I hope you are cleared now. BTW I have resubmitted the articles with more relevant sources. Please have a look or make someone to look it. Mohit235 (talk) 12:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 13:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblcok|Dear Wikipedia Team, 331dot, this guy is completely against me. I have contributed a lot for Wikipedia. But this guy is totally considering my work as wastage. I don't care if I'm blocked further. But you guys are losing a person who gave his best and tried to correct the information on this Organization. Anyways I won't write too much. If you think I must be unblocked then do it otherwise this 331dot, this idiot will ruin your Organization. Mohit235 (talk) 13:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are several formatting issues with your request which prevent its proper display and being seen by others. I would fix it for you, but you don't seem to want to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also be aware that personal attacks are not permitted. 331dot (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You just stay away now. You are the worst admin I have ever seen. You said something and did something else. Mohit235 (talk) 13:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Willing to stay away, but I've been completely consistent with all my statements. I was very clear with my warning above and gave you a chance to address it, but you continued to insist that the image of Mr. Bhalla was okay in terms of copyright when it clearly is not(as the website you say you got it from says "all rights reserved"). I had no choice but to block you to protect this project from further copyright violations. 331dot (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Admit it you are a worst admin. You don't deserve to be here. Mohit235 (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohit235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Team, 331dot, this guy is completely against me. I have contributed a lot for Wikipedia. But this guy is totally considering my work as wastage. Please someone else go through my contributions and then decide I should be blocked or unblocked. Thank you. Mohit235 (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your copyright violations were certainly inappropriate and need to be addressed. You also need to address the concerns of WP:UPE. Yamla (talk) 14:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohit235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin, This block is no longer necessary because I that I made a mistake by using someone else's image, causing copyright issue. However there were no consequence after this act and the image was also removed from Wiki Media. I will not do it again, will continue to make productive contributions as always.

Decline reason:

Now you need to address the concerns of WP:UPE. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Mohit235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin,

WP:UPE isn't relevant to me. I did it by mistake. Neither I was offered to this nor anyone guided me to do so. I just used an image and that is now deleted. So this doesn't apply on me. It was just a basic mistake. Please unblock.

Thank You.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Admin, 
WP:UPE isn't relevant to me. I did it by mistake. Neither I was offered to this nor anyone guided me to do so. I just used an image and that is now deleted. So this doesn't apply on me. It was just a basic mistake. Please unblock. 
Thank You. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Admin, 
WP:UPE isn't relevant to me. I did it by mistake. Neither I was offered to this nor anyone guided me to do so. I just used an image and that is now deleted. So this doesn't apply on me. It was just a basic mistake. Please unblock. 
Thank You. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Admin, 
WP:UPE isn't relevant to me. I did it by mistake. Neither I was offered to this nor anyone guided me to do so. I just used an image and that is now deleted. So this doesn't apply on me. It was just a basic mistake. Please unblock. 
Thank You. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

There is a Mohit who works for Mahesh Pandey Productions. Is that you? --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Mohit235 (talk) 12:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Mohit235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin, As previously said WP: UPE isn't applicable for me. This was not a paid contribution. Just a mistake. Kindly review my request and unblock. Thank you :)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Admin, As previously said WP: UPE isn't applicable for me. This was not a paid contribution. Just a mistake. Kindly review my request and unblock. 
Thank you :) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Admin, As previously said WP: UPE isn't applicable for me. This was not a paid contribution. Just a mistake. Kindly review my request and unblock. 
Thank you :) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Admin, As previously said WP: UPE isn't applicable for me. This was not a paid contribution. Just a mistake. Kindly review my request and unblock. 
Thank you :) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}