Jump to content

Talk:Colorado River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 22:02, 1 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 6 WikiProject template(s). Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep the rating of vital article "FA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove the same ratings as {{WPBS}} and keep only the dissimilar ones.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Featured articleColorado River is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 14, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 30, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 19, 2014.
Current status: Featured article

Metric units required

[edit]

According to WP:METRIC, international articles has to be metric first not imperial first. Imzadi1979 is an example of implementing “rude” behavior on international articles making them and reverting them to have imperial first. Imzadi1979 didn’t read WP:METRIC correctly. MetricSupporter89 (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. According to MOS:TIES, the Colorado River appears to have sufficient strong national ties to the US to use US English in the article—including the use of US units of measure as described at WP:METRIC. —C.Fred (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree as well. The vast majority of the Colorado River is in the United States and the small portion that is in Mexico is (sadly) pretty much dry. This is a U.S. topic. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Joining the chorus of disagreement. For better or worse, the Colorado River and other American rivers are widely known and measured in standard units such as acre-feet. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology missing

[edit]

Hello, shouldn't we add just a short sentence about the river's name? That it means "coloured" in Spanish? Any objections? Johnnyjanko (talk) 06:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Johnnyjanko I don't have any objections to it, provided you can find RS for that. Mgasparin (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flow rates and gauge data

[edit]

There is some discussion about the flow rate of tributaries at Wikipedia:Teahouse#How do I edit a page?. (Link will need to be updated when that section is archived.) — Pelagic (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discharge

[edit]

"In its natural state, the Colorado River poured about 16.3 million acre-feet (20.1 km3) into the Gulf of California each year, equaling an average discharge of 22,500 cubic feet per second (640 m3/s)."

This is misleading. Review of the thesis reveals (p. 114) that the 16.3 MaF figure was in reference to the total outflows of the current basin system, not the the yield of the Colorado River in its natural state. Spaetzlemuncher (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]