Talk:Battle of Nahavand

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Nahavand article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / Medieval / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Untitled

The entire Persian army was 50,000 to 150,000 and they took the entire army to a battle? That seems very strange to me! 82.70.40.190 It may seem strange to you but this was in effect a Persian last stand so taking their full force in order to quell the Arabian threat seems a fair assumption to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.112.146 (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Military handbooks reproduced by later Arab authors suggests that the army should be no bigger than 20,000, which seems to reflect what was normally raised by the Spahbed of each quarter. This seems like a very exaggerated number, and I am curious about sources for this, especially as the logistic difficulties of feeding such large numbers in this location would seem to be very challenging. Doug Melville (talk) 07:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of article

The name should be Battle of Nahavand, without the macron, which is how it's normally referred to in English. The transcription with the macron (Nahāvand) should be inserted after the Arabic to clarify it, but it is not normally used in English. Languagehat (talk) 22:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Nahāvand → Battle of Nahavand – No need for a macron, we don't tend to use that. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Per nom. Its redundant. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Per WP:USEENGLISH as it's not commonly used in English. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Same goes here, per Rreagan007.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sassanid numbers

It is very unlikely that after having their capital taken and the huge losses at al-qaddisiyah that the sassanids could field 100,000-150,000 men, even if they were just local levies.