Jump to content

User talk:Eupator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 5454 (talk | contribs) at 12:28, 2 April 2007 (→‎it was you 818 395 1294). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Usertalk-sprotect2

Archive
Archives
  1. User talk:Eupator/Archive 1 (18 May 2006)
  2. User talk:Eupator/Archive 2 (25 July 2006)
  3. User talk:Eupator/Archive 3 (8 September 2006)
  4. User talk:Eupator/Archive 4 (14 November 2006)
  5. User talk:Eupator/Archive 5 (12 January 2007)

Ararat arev

It seems he broke the 3RR on this too. Haik Nareklm 20:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Haik page cited sources

Eupator, what info do you need for the "Haik is used in place of Orion, in the Armenian translation of the Bible." Do you need it so have the cited source "Bible verses: Job 9:9, Job 38:22, Amos 5:7," or what else you need the date of the bible? The version of the bibles of Armenian and English to show that it is really Haik in Armenian, and Orion in English of those "verses" ? So what info you need for the source Ararat arev 22:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So the Bible is not a reliable source? Ararat arev 23:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone can look at the Bible and see that, specially when they are Armenian reading both languages. You can even check now you read Armenian? Ararat arev 23:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so Vahan Kurkjian mentioned it? Good. Dont worry about the Sumerian issues. I'll get reliable sources when I find them, and discuss first in Talk pages dont worry. Ararat arev 23:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure to put in the Orion_constellation|Orion link. Vahan also states its the Orion star constellation Ararat arev 23:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vahan Kurkjian mentioned as you said the location of Mitanni in Armenia. Also, look how far Persians and Indians are now? The Indo-Aryan people that is. Sanskrit is also Proto-IE.Ararat arev 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because...

...it was taking up space. I also apologize for not adding an edit summary. -- Clevelander 23:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Muslim casualties of World War I

Have you seen this yet?: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottoman Muslim casualties of World War I -- Clevelander 00:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haik

Ararat arev claims there's a consensus to unprotect the page. Is he correct? Khoikhoi 23:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you doing it or should I? Ararat arev 23:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dacy69

Hello again Eupator. Dacy69 has called for me to look into the current editing of Urartu, which I will do. He has also mentioned that he feels he is being stalked. It does strike me that he has a point when you follow his comment on my talk page with a comment of your own. You are an experienced and valued editor on Wikipedia, yet you do appear to be getting a little too personal and emotional in regard to Dacy69 and his editing. It doesn't look good for you when you present evidence of wikistalking at the time when an editor is complaining about such activity! Stay cool. Concentrate on the article, and let the appropriate Wikipedians take care of complaints. I would strongly advise you to take care in your dealings with editors with whom you are in dispute. Remain civil. And do not pounce on comments they make on other's talk pages. I'll now be looking at the recent edits made to the Urartu article. Regards. SilkTork 08:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urartu

I am working my way through the recent edits of the Urartu article. I find your 15th January edit of the article inappropriate. You are introducing a heavy weighted and unfounded political debate and inappropriate language history into a section of the article that is dealing with Ethnic Composition. Given the recent edit dispute with this article, and my own involvement as Advocate, this is a provocative thing to do. SilkTork 19:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Just to let you know I will be helping in the dispute you are in. Do you know the policy Wikipedia:Ownership_of_articles? I feel as if you think you own the article and you don't want anyone else editing it, am I right? If I am right then you are breaking this policy. Also if you reverted his edits without looking at them like he said then you are sending the message that you do not care about what he rights. Assume good faith, even if he is wrong assume that he is doing for the good of wikipedia. You should Stay away from deleting info if it talkes about trying not to delete info with Verifiable and a Reliable source. Also I would like you to look at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. Have a nice week and god bless. --James, La gloria è a dio 15:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 20:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prohaeresius

  • Prohaeresius needed just a little Wikification (mostly just paragraph breaks); I gave it such and moved it to DYK next update. It's a very good article and I enjoyed reading it.
  • The problem with using the term "Zakarid-Mxargrzeli" rather than "Mkhargrdzeli" in the Ani article is that the later term has a reference in the Ani article, the former doesn't. You did a great job with references in the Prohaeresius article...just do the same with this edit and it will be good. Thanks, House of Scandal 04:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

....speaking of which

Updated DYK query On January 19, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Prohaeresius, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Merci, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Can you please check out Talk:Agos#Meaning of Agos? Thanks, Khoikhoi 03:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FSU Metro Project

Remember Yerevan Metro, and my priceless contribution to it, want to make it better, help us here, and let the article get much needed attention...--Kuban Cossack 23:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MThis user is a participant in the Soviet Metro wikiproject.
It's ready...please join! --Kuban Cossack 14:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

I've seen worser ones didn't think it was that bad. Nareklm 19:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would help, plus i added the statue pic looks nice, hopefully it would be chosen when you enter it. Nareklm 20:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for your support

--Yannismarou 20:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you set out for Ithaka, hope the voyage is long
Knowledge is your destiny, but don't ever hurry the journey
May there be many summer mornings when
With what pleasure and joy, you come into harbors seen for the first time

Don't expect Ithaka to make you rich. Ithaka gave you the marvelous journey
And, if I, one of your fellow-travellers, can offer something
To make this journey of yours even more fascinating and enjoyable
This is my assistance with anything I can help.

AMA ll

I have asked a lot of people to give there oppinion on this case. --James, La gloria è a dio 02:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ararat arev

*Sigh*, he's in for an indef. block if he doesn't knock if off soon... Khoikhoi 03:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nagorno-Karabakh

The second source was from a scholar i got, it was not the armenian one. Nareklm 18:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine than, another thing a non-English source is not considered reliable eh... Nareklm 18:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think this is needed, on wikipedia? [1] Nareklm 14:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ill try to get a better one soon. Nareklm 14:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely done! :) hopefully, [2] Nareklm 18:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Changed it, [3] Nareklm 18:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eupator, please refrain from reverting back to Golbez's biased intro without consulting the archivs first, if you did you would see that that was not the intro we all agreed upon (just look at how the "Armenian region" is completely taken out of context and causes that sentence to take on a one-sided POV, no one ever agreed to that).HyeProfile 00:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to the project! Just about after the merger! We start work here with some useful features and our last newsletter!--Yannismarou 16:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the WikiProject Greece! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Greece.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Interested in working on a more complete article? The peer review department of the project would welcome your help!
  • Interested in a particular area of Greek history, geography, culture etc. ? There is already one task force, and you could initiate the creation of more focusing on specific topics or periods.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

WikiProject Greece Newsletter - Issue V (I) - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter (the first issue after the merger of the History of Greece Wikiproject with the Wikiproject Greece) has been published.

You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.

Thank you.--Yannismarou 16:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help

Dear Eupator!

I understood that you are an English native speaker and you worked on pages related to Iran. Then I would like to aks you to see my works on Iranian cinema and in particular Abbas Kiarostami. I would like to have comments from people to have an idea of my works' possible shortcommings. Thanks for your time. Sangak 21:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nakhichevan

Hey Eup, could you look over the early history of the Nakhichevan article? I want to make sure that it's accurate. It seems as though we're missing significant details from the second and third paragraphs. -- Aivazovsky 21:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian-Udi

Would you be able to provide an explanation for the tag on the talk page? It no longer says that Udis are Turkic peoples. Khoikhoi 15:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but shouldn't it just be renamed and NPOV'd rather than being deleted? It seems to me that the subject itself is notable, right? Khoikhoi 22:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Location Maps

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb2007 20:10 (UTC)

Proposing to merge List of basic classics topics to Classics

Seeking concensus on proposed merger at Talk:Classics. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 01:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artashisian dynasty

Can I create Artashisian dynasty and Rubinian dynasty or is it already covered? Nareklm 07:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem on that, also on the dynasties there already covered obviously i acted to fast. Nareklm 07:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USSR image

Ah, thanks, but... 1967 isn't before 1954, is it? Besides, shouldn't we be applying Armenian rather than Russian rules? They seem to have 50 years after death of author ([4], p.16) Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Varazdat

Is Varazdat really a boxer? Nareklm 08:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armenians

I understood your point but I also said that since you show Nagorno-Karabakh as a separate entity on that list, you already automatically imply that it is de facto independent. Reference to Azerbaijan must be made because the status of Nagorno-Karabakh is different from that of Russia, France, Iran or Lebanon, which are mentioned concurrently. Since it is not possible for Azerbaijan to appear on that list, some credit to it must be given; you cannot disregard it completely unless Nagorno-Karabakh is officially independent. As for the category, I don't see why you have to attach any footnotes to it. Even if you don't agree with it in terms of the NK issue, some Armenians still live in Azerbaijan outside of NK, thus the category seems perfectly suitable. Parishan 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That footnote is more apt when you add the category, rather than when you remove it. It makes much more sense to show 'Ethnic groups in Azerbaijan' and to add that according to Nationmaster.com:Azerbaijan "almost all Armenians live in the separatist Nagorno-Karabakh region". And the footnote does not cover the de facto vs. de juro issue at all. Parishan 20:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't given any reasonable justification why the 'Ethnic groups in Azerbaijan' category shouldn't be shown. Why is there "no way"? Like I said, that category covers Nagorno-Karabakh, and the footnote as well as the infobox clearly explain that when one speaks of Armenians in Azerbaijan, it's mostly de facto independent Nagorno-Karabakh that is concerned. Parishan 21:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The whole current status information is right on display, in the infobox. Besides, sources like CIA, Nationmaster and even Wikipedia itself list Armenians among ethnic groups that live in Azerbaijan. I don't understand how this shouldn't be the case with the Armenians article. Parishan 21:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for support in MilHist elections

Hello! I would like to ask you for your support in the Military history Coordinator elections being held presently. If you would like to support myself or any other candidate, please add your name to the list below my entry or theirs. We are looking to elect seven upstanding Wikipedians to ensure even more and better quality articles are produced and maintained in the coming year. Thank you! --Petercorless 15:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your recent spate of edit warring today is unacceptable. Three reverts at both Tigranes the Great and Nakhichevan and more at Urartu, plus uncivil accusations of vandalism [5], are unproductive. This is particularly true when yo immediately begin edit warring on an article that was just unprotected. When you return from your block, please use dispute resolution to politely work out the conflict in a manner suitable to encyclopedia editing. Dmcdevit·t 21:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

I have opened an arbitration case regarding the current editing dispute you've been involved in. Please make a statement at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Armenia-Azerbaijan concerning the conflict with the other parties listed. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 10:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 18:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Committee injunction

The Arbitration Committee has adopted a temporary injunction in the case of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan, in which you have been named as a party. The injunction provides: Until the conclusion of this case, all parties are restricted to one content revert per article per day, and each content revert must be accompanied by a justification on the relevant talk page. Violators may be blocked for up to 24 hours. The case remains open for the submission of evidence or proposals. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 00:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

careful

Adil violated his 1RR parole on Tigran The Grear article, be careful not to do the same. Fad (ix) 16:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that.-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 16:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Greece Newsletter - Issue VI (II) - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.

Thank you.--Yannismarou 18:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Paytakaran

See: Talk:Paytakaran#Unprotection

The Transhumanist   11:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arsacid Dynasty of Armenia

There's no way of finding this article since,Arsacid Dynasty goes to the Iranian one, is it possible to put a link? Artaxiad 02:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images

Hi. I noticed that you are using Image:YBC logo.jpg on your user page. Please note that Wikipedia's fair use policy does not permit the use of non-free images outside of article space. You can link to the image from your user page, but you cannot display it there. Please remove this image and any other non-free images that you may be using from your user page. Thank you. --BigDT 03:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

I am going to become active in the case again:) I hope I can help. During this dispute if you feel as if you are getting real mad just take a break from the dispute. God bless:) --James, La gloria è a dio 22:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

That doesn't make any sense, I reverted to the version by Escarbot... [6] Khoikhoi 03:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see now. I always revert blindly when it's by a banned user, sorry about that. Khoikhoi 03:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paytakaran

As mediator on the dispute over the Paytakaran article, I've made some suggestions to resolve the various matters, and have requested further information on one of the issues. Your participation is welcome. The Transhumanist   19:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Khachkar destruction

Hi. Please see Talk:Khachkar destruction#This_article. - Richard Cavell 04:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me just put it this way

This isnt going to stop, Im hacking accounts going back to 2004 and I have many IP's that if they block 1000's of people will be blocked too, they use them also —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tcm (talk • contribs) 16:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Blocked

Blocked: 24 hours. this edit was clearly a revert, you even titled it, "rv suppression of source." (Although you reverted to a vandalized version that is an irrelevant mistake.) The parole requires you to explain all reverts on the talk page. You should have attempted to discuss why you restored the Geocities link rather than simply reverting without comment. Thatcher131 00:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WikiProject Greece Newsletter - Issue VII (III) - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.

Thank you.--Yannismarou 15:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eupator&oldid=119704253"