Talk:Guest iin London

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 05 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atithi in London → Atithii Iin London – Spelling error. I don't want it to do myself because Atithi in London will show redirect in my contributions, which I don't want it to happen. Proof. – Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 13:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 17:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a deliberate misspelling, is that correct? — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 15:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I know it's a little strange spelling made to in, but open the link. You will see in the photo a man in which he shows the title of the film. Rest is your wish. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 17:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The references cited 1 2 still spell it with the current title, however. If this is a WP:NAMECHANGES scenario, I believe that new sources should be reliably spelling it with the new title. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 17:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose that photo may be a joke. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @In ictu oculi: What makes you think it's a joke? PC78 (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Title has been tweeted by the film's director and the story has been reported by the Times of India (linked above) and by Filmfare [1]. No reason to think that it's not legit, though the nom's reluctance to have a redirect show up in thier contributions seems a bit odd. PC78 (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If this move does occur, the resulting redirect must be preserved I'm afraid. There are more than 50 incoming links to it. So if nom is hoping that an admin will suppress the redirect creation, no, we won't. Andrewa (talk) 03:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sequel?

Guest iin London is not a sequel to Atithi Tum Kab Jaoge?.

The co-producer himself (Kumar Mangat Pathak) has said that it is not a sequel. Link: IndiaGlitz
- Caleb KG (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]