Jump to content

Talk:Hulk in other media

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 16:40, 3 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Comics}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hulk Ep 16.jpg

[edit]

Image:Hulk Ep 16.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MVSC2HULK.jpg

[edit]

Image:MVSC2HULK.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Avengers film and potential Sequel(s)

[edit]

Sorry for my undoing of other edits, I was in the process of adding references, before my edits were undone. I'm adding in the ref. seen on The Incredible Hulk (film) and The Avengers (2011 film) and The Avengers (film series) articles.--Snowman Guy (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — I appreciate the discussion. Some of the material in the paragraph that was added, specifically the 2011 projected date for the Avengers movie, repeated what was already said in this section's first paragraph. Also, the information about announced films starring Thor, Ant-Man, etc. is not Hulk-specific, but belongs, if anywhere, in the Avengers article. Do you see what I mean? --Tenebrae (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I see. Well, how about something like this:
"Also, Marvel has regained the rights to the other heroes in the Avengers"

Thoughts?--Snowman Guy (talk) 14:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what "regained" means? Had Marvel lost the rights? Had character licenses expired and reverted to Marvel? Not sure this is relevant as to specifically the Hulk. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I've just 'ported over a cite for one of your edits, from the Incredible Hulk (film). We still need a cite there and here to confirm Nelson did sign on for a sequel. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just throwing it in there that Norton has been confirmed to be coming back for the Avengers movie, which was confirmed over at superherohype.com. Somebody should add that into the article. Son of Kong (talk) 10 September 2008

Bruce Banner in Iron Man 3

[edit]

I think this is a case where we can apply WP:COMMONSENSE and say that, despite the article title containing only "Hulk" and not "Bruce Banner", appearances of his alter-ego definitely fit under the scope. And readers will almost certainly come here looking for them. Just as the main article is about both Hulk and Bruce Banner, this article is about appearances of both in other media. Cheers. -Fandraltastic (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Not only is Banner not in the title, he's not in the lead or infobox as well. Maybe if it was more than just a cameo appearance, then possibly it could be listed, but it's not. --Musdan77 (talk) 23:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Banner should be in the lead though, and he should be in the infobox. An incomplete lead and infobox don't mean the rest of the page's content should be incomplete and needlessly exclusionary. I honestly don't understand what there is to oppose here? They're the same character. Hulk is the WP:COMMONNAME. "Hulk and Bruce Banner in other media" would be a clunky article title. But appearances by Banner are clearly under the scope here. -Fandraltastic (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The lead sentence could be changed (changes in bold) to read: "The comic book character The Hulk and his alter ego Bruce Banner have also appeared in many other types of media." After all, Bruce Banner redirects to Hulk (comics) anyway. As long as the Banner appearances are limited to where he doesn't also appear as The Hulk (such as Iron Man 3), I don't see any problem with it. Fortdj33 (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daredevil Netflix Series

[edit]

Would it be worth mentioning that a framed newspaper clipping showing an image of the Hulk with the headline 'Hulk emerges victorious in destructive uptown battle' appears in Ben Urich's office throughout season 1 of Netflix's Daredevil show?The Editor 155 (talk) 00:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. That's trivia. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hulk in other media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A parody the hulk in one of the barnyard episodes.

[edit]

In one of the Barnyard episodes by nick a dr. Pig segment Pig drinks a can of atomic waste, to prove his point that “it will give you heat vision is a myth”. Only for him to be turned into a pig version of the character complete with big, cartoony, muscles, green skin, and purple shorts which causes him to act and talk like him hilarious and I believe at the end of the same episode the rest of the crew gets turned into hulk like animals too. NMSreader (talk) 06:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]