Jump to content

Talk:Aurizon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 9 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Companies}}, {{WikiProject Trains}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Merge with Queensland Rail

[edit]
The result of the debate was do not merge. --WikiCats 06:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

[edit]

The text in this article is correct, but the title of this page should not have a space (meaning it should be QRNational not QR National/QR_National). Because Wikipedia file names are case-sensitive, it means that the page will have to be replaced with a redirect to a spaceless-titled name. Seo75 18:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shifting page per proper name at QR site. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 01:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Aurizon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Aurizon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aurizon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add 5040 Class?

[edit]

Is 5040 just a mild upgrade of the 5020s, or a more significant difference. Either way, it should be noted for completeness.

Wikipedians may feel free to delete this section when 5040 class is addressed in the Aurizon main page.

Tuna Fish 5 (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious statement

[edit]

First sentence: “and the largest of its kind in the nation.” I think that this is a little dubious, considering the fact that the “fact” comes from their own website as per the reference with nothing to back up what that actually means. Also of note, Pacific National’s website says the exact same thing about themselves. Thoughts on changing it to “one of the largest”? Fork99 (talk) 06:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that questionable statement and added a similar more specific claim from third parties. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Future structure of One Rail and Aurizon articles

[edit]

Please join a discussion I've initiated on the Talk:One Rail Australia page about the appropriate treatment of the One Rail article, which will have a few (fairly minor) consequences for the Aurizon article. SCHolar44 (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your information: new Aurizon-relevant article on Magnetic Rail Group

[edit]

Dear colleagues, This is to let you know that I have prepared a new article on Magnetic Rail Group, the purchasers of Aurizon's divested assets. It replaces the interim article on "East Coast Rail", which as you may well know was the name of Aurizon's independent business unit that administered the divestiture. Discussion is here. Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 06:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aurizon&oldid=1205497824"