Jump to content

User talk:Hms1103

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hms1103 (talk | contribs) at 20:24, 13 February 2024 (→Obtaining the image for SLIM article: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marco Polo (spacecraft), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Welcome!

Hello, Hms1103, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Roshan220195 (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work (and explanation) on Japanese space program template! PSR B1937+21 (talk) 10:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you! I added JUICE to Template:Japanese space program per the explanation I gave at your talk page. Hms1103 (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Smart Lander for Investigating Moon"...

Hi Hms1103, and thank you for your message.
I have un-"WP:SALT"-ed the page. Please do go ahead and write about this.
But also please also remember that Wikipedia does not predict the future. According to The Japan Times, JAXA won't be flying to the moon until at least 2019, ね?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hms1103. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hms1103. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Satellite and spacecraft instruments

This template could benefit from your experience and dedication. It looks quite incomplete:

Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BatteryIncluded: Done (for today). This is one of several Wikipedia pages that I've been avoiding as I felt there were too many tasks to do for just a single page, and felt there was no need to rush as it's pretty challenging to complete it anyway. Some of my Eventualist tendencies, I guess. Thanks for giving me a reason to work on this template. Regards, Hms1103 (talk) 21:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm wondering if you speak Japanese. I'm trying to find out the launch date -or year- for Orbiting Binary Black Hole Investigation Satellite (ORBIS). In the NavBar for Space observatories it shows its launch is planned for 2018 but I could not verify that. Thanks! BatteryIncluded (talk)

@BatteryIncluded:I can't find any information about a launch contract/schedule for ORBIS, although an news article about a year old featuring the project says :
 機体の完成は２０１８年３月の予定だ。
That the spacecraft (the FM?) is scheduled to be completed in March 2018. I assume this information is outdated, although posts on their facebook page mentions delivery of a S-band receiver and antenna last December.
ORBIS originally was a 3U CubeSat, and a poster from that time says they're assuming a piggyback launch on a H-IIA. If they're still sticking on that option, it won't be launched in 2018 as the only piggyback opportunity this year (Flight 39 carrying GOSAT-2) is already booked. They could theoretically still launch this year if they're going for a commercial launch with Soyuz or PSLV (a popular alternative for Japanese microsatellites).
Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your time looking into this. Cheers! BatteryIncluded (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BatteryIncluded:A couple of more search, and it turns out that there's several documents dated from 2016 saying that their launch goal is 2020.[1][2][3] So to sum things up, they plan to complete the spacecraft around 2018 and launch in 2020. It's based on old sources, but thats my current conclusion. Kind regards,Hms1103 (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ispace - Japanese company

Hello. I just created an article on ispace (Japanese company), and I would be grateful for any feedback and corrections. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC) (Formerly BatteryIncluded)[reply]

@Rowan Forest:Hi, thanks for creating a good start on the subject. As I will likely add reference-available content to the article, I'll write here things I'm not so certain about. Firstly, about the Peregrine contract with Astrobotic, I haven't heard anything in two or three years so I doubt it will actually happen. Hakuto apparently ended after the Google Lunar X Prize reached its deadline, and iSpace seems to be more willing to develop their own lunar lander. About the Lunar lander-orbiter, I assume they are manufacturing two identical landers. The first flight will demonstrate capability to reach lunar orbit (not sure if they're aiming to land in this flight), and the following one will demonstrate landing capability. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The ispace home page seems outdated, and a few sources speak of an "orbiting lander". No explanations given. I too wonder if it will detach and land at some point or the purpose of it just orbiting. I too wonder if team Hakuto still exists, as they got good financing for serious development; it would make more sense to design and test a lander & rover concept that can applied to commercial services. I will keep on reviewing "recent" sources for updates. Thank you. Rowan Forest (talk) 22:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ALINA lander & Audi

Hello. According to the web site of PTScientists, Audi is not just a sponsor but is developing the 2 rovers: [4]. Audi web site also claims developing the rovers using Audi technology: [5], [6]. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowan Forest: Hi Rowan, thanks for the links. As Part-Time Scientists were already developing a rover called Asimov prior to Audi becoming a partner with the team, I misunderstood that the company was I merely contributing financial aid, and perhaps some know-how and allowing the team to use facilities , at most (for example, Hakuto conducted radio wave tests at a lab of cellular company KDDI, one of their sponsors; and Astrobotic will have all of their customer's packages delivered to them by DHL). It was new to hear that Audi was providing key technology, along with sending designers to actually design the rover. I appreciate the correction. As always, Hms1103 (talk) 08:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of PTScientists, I've always been wondered whether the PTScientists article should be connected to m:Wikipedia to the Moon/About. This was a project around 2016 to have a data disc containing Wikipedia articles placed on board the team(then known as Part-Time Scientists)'s lander. Although I stand in favor of this project, I am uncertain how to treat it in relation to an actual article, for I fear mentioning it in the PTScientists article may be perceived as advertising Wikipedia itself and against WP:PROMOTION. On a side note there already are cases in which the content of the page has a direct connection to Wikipedia, as in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Archive 7#First content made for Wikipedia in space! I would like to hear your view on this matter. At least the rover image may be used, as the current one in the PTScientists article is a couple generations-old than the latest design. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
They are actually planning on bringing it to the lunar surface, so it makes it notable. I think a brief and neutral mention -and reference- is not promotion. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 17:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tanpopo mission

Hello. I am requesting that if you come across any recent article or news regarding the Japanese Tanpopo (mission) experiment, please let me know. They published the preliminary results from the first year of exposures, and I am very interested in updating the article with the results from the second year, especially the capture of microscopic particles (spores and bacteria) in low Earth orbit. Thank you again for all your help. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk)

@Rowan Forest: If you wait for a few months, there should be more information available, as there are several astrobiology-related domestic conferences from autumn to spring. I was able to find some presentations; here's a one titled Overall of Tanpopo mission and the initial analysis results of the second return exposure sample. Below is a raw translation of page12:
Summary of space environment exposure experiment
・At 100μm the microbes died out
・At more than 500μm the microbes survived
・At 100μm died out due to severe DNA damage
・DNA double strand rupture also happened at 500μm
・Repair-survival at 500μm due to repair genes
・Gene mutations in surviving strains are not much
・Amino acid precursors survived 60%
・All these are new
・P-015, 016, 017
100 and 500μm are for the Thickness of cell-aggregate used throughout the presentation. In page16 there's mention of ultra high-speed collision marks of meteoroid-origin. In page19 it says:　"Tanpopo first returned sample(2016 September) were extracted from aerogel and analyzed in the order of SEM→μ-FTIR→FIB-SEM→STXM-XANES→nanoSIMS. The two types of captured microparticles examined were identified as carbonate, glass(or quartz), respectively. carbon・oxygen isotope composition were close to values of Earth-origin."
These two are about the first-year samples, but this is a recent paper, and this a presentation form earlier this year (in English!). There appears to be talks of a Post-Tanpopo mission, as in here. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 09:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Looking forward to the full reports from years 2 and 3. Please let me know if I can help you with any of your research for Wikipedia. Like you, I am also functional in Spanish. Rowan Forest (talk) 15:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
De nada. I may ask for your help regarding space development in Latin America someday. As always, Hms1103 (talk) 03:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hibari

Hello. I noticed in the Space Observatories navbar [7] a red link to a proposed telescope named "Hibari". The only document I found so far deals with a Japanese microsatellite called Hibari meant to test a pointing technology called Variable Shape Attitude Control (VSAC) [8]. Although this technology could be eventually used on spacecraft, including space telescopes, the microsatellite Hibari is not a space telescope, but a project to develop navigational/pointing technology. My intention is to delete it from the list of telescopes, unless there is actually a proposed space telescope also called Hibari. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard that message. I read further below the introduction and the microsatellite is proposed to include a small telescope to verify the orientation (pointing) accuracy. The satellite would be a 6U CubeSat, where 3U are occupied by the telescope. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rowan Forest:Hi Rowan, thanks for creating the article (I've got a bad habit to create red links and forget about them). Hibari (Japanese for skylark) is a spacecraft being developed by the Tokyo Institute of Technology for both technology demonstration and astronomical observation. As the above paper was mostly about the tech side, to add some science perspective: the VSAC method is for enabling rapid response follow-up of gravitational wave sources, which after the arrival of the first wave gets dimmer real soon (Hibari will study in the UV spectrum). Page10 to 44 of this presentation has some images of this operation. The idea is to use this satellite as part of the recent trend in high energy space physics to conduct multi-messenger astronomy, in which gravity-wave telescopes like LIGO first sounds the alarm, then Hibari immediately uses VSAC to detect the location of the gravitational wave source, and alert larger telescopes like Swift and NICER to conduct dedicated follow-up observations. Here's an English interview of an astronomer in the project. Google translate kind of works for this article about Hibari.
Hibari is a successor to TITech's 2014 Tsubame satellite which was to study gamma-ray bursts but was hampered by communication issues. By the way, I was unaware that they switched to a CubeSat design; as recently as last year Hibari was still a larger 50 kg microsatellite. I heard they haven't secured any launch contracts, so I assume the change is to increase the chances to get a ride by increasing compatibility with potential launchers (and perhaps the usual funding issues persistent in college projects). Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 14:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hms1103. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hakuto's rover

Hello. I have a question. In the Lunar rovers template I see listed both Hakuto and Sorato as separate rovers and years, but I understand that Hakuto is the team building the Sorato rover. If you can review that, I would appreciate it. Also, in the same template there is the "Andy" rover, but its link takes me to Astrobotic Technology and it mentions nothing about such rover. Delete it? Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 00:47, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Astrobotic's rover, it will be launched in 2020, but it is part of a fascinating program to build small modular and inexpensive rovers using a common architecture similar to the CubeSat concept. It is called CubeRover. I'm working now on a draft of that program. The Andy rover seems a concept that went nowhere...or could it have been the root of CubeRover?? I find nothing yet to link them both. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 03:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rowan Forest: Hi, I'll answer both questions one at a time. ispace: According to their website, they plan to launch an orbital mission in 2020, and a lander mission in 2021. No mention of Astrobotic. I strongly doubt they plan to launch any payload on Peregrine, as unlike in GLXP where the goal was to get to the moon ASAP, ispace is likely pursuing profit now. According to this article, Astrobotic's maiden mission has been delayed to 2021, the same year ispace plans to launch their own lander. The reason I left Sorato in the Lunar rovers template was since Astrobotic still lists Hakuto on Peregrine's manifest.
In September, ispace announced that they are naming the program for their first two missions (the orbiter and the lander) as 'Hakuto-R'. The name of the individual missions and the hardware seems to be unnamed. I heard prior to GLXP's culmination that Hakuto completed testing Sorato, so I assume they have a flightworthy rover, but I'm not sure that Sorato is going to be the rover to fly in 2021. They may develop something new like Astrobotic.
Astrobotic: Yes, there has been no announcements on Andy for years, not even on their User's Guide or Twitter account. I assume the truth is either a) they've completed developing Andy, so no recent announcements. The only thing left to do is wait for launch b) they decided not to fly Andy on Peregrine anymore as GLXP ended, and no Andy means capacity for customers to increase their payload, or c) they replaced Andy with CubeRover, as you suggested. Probably one of these three, but there's no definite news about it that I'm aware. Speaking of Astrobotic, last month they announced that they've begun researching landing techniques intended for icy worlds. Regards, Hms1103 (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I will read your info with calm. It looks like Astrobotics is also developing a "excavating" rover called Polaris. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rowan Forest: Polaris was a concept rover for excavating lunar ice that Astrobotic developed through a NASA SBIR technology development contract in 2012 (astrobotic presser nasa article). It had a drill and was designed to carry an NASA instrument package. Polaris was developed in parallel to Red Rover/Andy, which was Astobotic's main focus at the time to compete in GLXP. Polaris likely wont fit inside Astrobotic's current Peregrine lander, as it was sized for an earlier, larger lander called Griffin. Here's a source. The whole story is rather complicated, so do check the publication dates. Regards, Hms1103 (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merry Christmas! A Christmas cookie for you. Thanks for all your volunteer work. All the best Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly there aren't any cookies in space, though I was able to find this in a NASA educational website. Jokes aside, happy holidays, Rowan! Your work to disambiguate confusing subjects (ispace/i-Space, oceanus/oceanus, PanCam/Pancam, to name just a few) is helpful not just to Wikipedia, but to every avid learner of space science. Last but not least, yoi otoshi wo, and may 2019 be another productive year! Hms1103 (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JUICE mission to Jupiter

Hello. I just noticed that Japan (JAXA) is participating in the planned Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) mission, but their web page is in Japanese [9] so I can't see what is their role. I am especially interested to document any participation developing a science instrument for this mission. Any help will be appreciated. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowan Forest:Hey Rowan, sorry for the late reply. I was curious about it myself, and below is the full list of hardware contributions from Japan that I made a few years ago.
  • SWI(primary and secondary mirror, actuator)
  • RPWI(High Frequency Receiver System, DPU software)
  • PEP(electronics for JNA)
  • GALA(receiving optics and detector for TRU)
PEP is composed of six instruments, and JNA is one of it. Please note that the contributions to SWI is led by the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), an organization separate from JAXA, thus the SWI contribution is semi-independent from the JUICE-JAPAN framework, based in JAXA.
In addition to these hardware contributions, JAXA researchers are science co-investigators in JANUS and J-MAG. For J-MAG in particular, JAXA is responsible for formulating the required performance, testing, and analysis of JACS (JUICE Magnetometer Alignment Calibration System).
To be honest, I feel the details of these contributions seem rather trivial (other than, perhaps SWI and GALA). Of more appeal is the science that JUICE JAPAN is aiming for. Here's some posters about this aspect (in Japanese unfortunately).[10][11] They plan to actively engage in specific themes such as the formulation of the Jovian system, through synergy of observational data gained from their contributing instruments.
As I happen to be traveling right now, I'll work on translating the documents around Wednesday. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hms1103: Wow. That was a very thorough answer. For Wikipedia purposes, you are correct in that it seems trivial, so I will just mention that Japan will support the development and testing of several instruments. Please do not spend more time translating documents. You have done more than enough for us. Thank you! Rowan Forest (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add, another tie between JUICE and Japan is the instrument logo for SWFI. It features a game character from Sega named Sonic. The European team first came up with the idea, and they asked their colleagues at Tohoku University to contact Sega, which in turn gave their consent. Here's the pressers:[12][13] As always, Hms1103 (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Reply from User:Spotty's Friend

Hi Hms1103, thanks for the explanations and clarifications that you placed on my talk page last week regarding format for List of Solar System probes. I'll keep them in mind in the future.

cheers, Spotty's Friend (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yokohama Municipal Subway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Circle Line and Hiyoshi Station. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Double spacing

I noticed that you removed the double spacing from Dynetics X-61 Gremlins with the edit summary "No double space". I just want to know that while there is nothing against removing them in the guidelines, double spaces are perfectly acceptable per Wikipedia:DOUBLE SPACE. Additionally, double spaces help with readability in the source editor. - ZLEA T\C 16:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Project Spaceflight!

The SPFLT Achievement Patch
For your willingness to work on space projects and your courage to speak up in Discussion! Neopeius (talk) 15:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


moved comment

Hi, I moved your comment from Talk:Galileo program to Talk:Galileo project manually, as part of a fix to the botched split. I'm just letting you know so you don't think it was deleted. Tercer (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Future Science Institute" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Future Science Institute and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 22#Future Science Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Söğüt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ablution.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

H3 (rocket)

Hello. JAXA held a press conference on January 21, 2022 and announced that the H3 launch schedule will be postponed. They say they want to launch as soon as possible, but they can't decide when. Currently, only press releases published in Japanese are available. I hope this link[14] will help you.--SLIMHANNYA (talk) 09:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SLIMHANNYA: Thanks for commenting here. 「2021年度の打上げを見合わせる」, which is written in JAXA's press release means the rocket will not launch on 31 March 2022, but can launch any time starting from 1 April 2021, so I wrote NET (No Earlier Than) April 2022. If I write in an easy-to-understand way, NET April means 「4月以降」 in Japanese. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Arca Dynamics

Hello, Hms1103, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arca Dynamics, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arca Dynamics.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 22:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hms1103. Thank you for creating RAISE-3. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hms1103. Thank you for creating MAGNARO. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hms1103. Thank you for creating WASEDA-SAT-ZERO. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hms1103. Thank you for creating KOSEN-2. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makoto Suwa moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Makoto Suwa, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 14:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sotetsu and Tokyu Shin Yokohama Lines

Template:Sotetsu and Tokyu Shin Yokohama Lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makoto Suwa has been accepted

Makoto Suwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hakuto-R m2

Hello, I just wanted to inform you about the reverted edit you recently made on “Hakuto-R mission 1”, you said that rover will instead be for mission 2 but I would like to inform you that rover will not be for mission 2, that rover was from the google lunar x prise. The rover for M2 is yet to be revealed but will feature a robotic arm and will be made in Luxembourg. 109.79.56.238 (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hms1103. Thank you for your work on DigitalBlast. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obtaining the image for SLIM article

Hi there, hope you're doing good. I recently spotted the request for the image of SLIM on the surface of the moon taken by Sora-Q. I searched for it, it's available in the digital archives section on JAXA's website here, they have a process for obtaining the image for academic, educational, or media purposes. So all I want to ask you is, should we go ahead with this way or not? I was about to start the application process but thought I should confirm with you once. We also need to submit the draft of the content we wish to use it in, as you might know. It would be the ultimate thing that the article needs after you created it years ago. So pls just confirm if this is how we proceed. AnalyserOP (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for contacting me here. First of all I think adding this particular image to the SLIM page will greatly improve it, but (as you may be already aware) the particular image cannot be uploaded at Wikimedia Commons as it's likely non-free, it can only be uploaed directly to the English Wikipedia. There's already precedent with a JAXA image for this, namely File:Surface of Ryugu from MINERVA-II1 Rover-1A.jpg. As for the draft, I guess there'll be a caption like 'Photograph of SLIM resting on one side after landing, taken by the LEV-2 rover' (I'm open to further improvement). I can speak and write in Japanese, so if you don't mind I can contact them and send an application for use in the article. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hms1103&oldid=1207038477"