Jump to content

Talk:Jo Inkpin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 14:42, 15 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}, {{WikiProject Australian Women in Religion}}, {{WikiProject LGBT studies}}, {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Women in Religion}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did You Know Nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk23:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by DrMushEa (talk). Self-nominated at 00:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: There is an unsourced statement in the Writing section of the article concerning authorship of a website called Trans Spirit Flourishing which needs to be sourced before the nomination can proceed. Additionally, the CopyVio detector returned an extremely high hit on the following page: [2]. This is due to the bibliography present in both this article and that page. The formatting is extremely similar, and unstandardized, and should probably be reformatted with the cite book template. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've thinned the bibliography and converted them to book citations to reduce the copyvio score, as well as removing some of the entries which appeared to be blog entries that I could not verify. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The unsourced statement mentioned above has been rectified. by the nominator. Everything looks good now, DrMushEa, excellent work here and thank you for your prompt fix of the source issue! /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name issue

[edit]

In just about any instance (taking a husband's last name; being adopted as a child; taking a performance or activist name; taking a religious name), the name the person received at birth would be given, with no problem. But with the obsession over this thing called "deadnaming" it is verboten in this case. But the irony here is that, in view of the chronology given here, Dr. Inkpin must have written Dr. Inkpin's doctoral dissertation under Dr. Inkpin's given name--the one we must pretend never existed. That could create some small difficulties for someone who might want to look up Dr. Inkpin's dissertation. Uporządnicki (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DEADNAME says include birth name (Jonathan David Francis Inkpin) in the lead as Inkpin was notable under that name. Greenshed (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]