This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Was at 5 for 168. It's either 4 for 22 (innings) or 6 for 130 (match), I assume the former. Both from last test. Source cric-info. Also, average earthman, all those edits were made after the last test, and the para on that test still seems clunky; what does "...but then when for 108 runs over 24 overs, albeit with two wickets, in a high-scoring Pakistan first innings." mean? --Mongreilf09:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"when" should be "went". Someone has already corrected it. As for the statistical edits, if they were made after the test matches, the updates were even more incompetent - wrong number of Test runs, massively wrong number of overs, hadn't updated the ODI record or the date. As for the 5/168, I was copying directly the Cricinfo numbers, so I've no idea how that happened. Average Earthman21:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
