This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 22:08, 23 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Bush family}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Conservatism}}, {{WikiProject History}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:08, 23 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Bush family}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Conservatism}}, {{WikiProject History}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bush family, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Bush familyWikipedia:WikiProject Bush familyTemplate:WikiProject Bush familyBush family articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2014. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
Abu Ghraib prisoner torture image
The iconic[1][2][3][4] photographs of torture at Abu Ghraib became defining images of the War on Terror.
My diff (shown at right) was reverted by Drdpw with the comment "Adds nothing substantive to article". The images of the torture that occurred at Abu Ghraib were immensely consequential in shaping public opinion about the Iraq War and the U.S.'s torture of detainees. "The Hooded Man" in particular is considered an iconic image from the Iraq War – I included sources on this as well. Its inclusion is absolutely justified. Looking at the other images from the article, some of them appear to be more "decoration" that don't add substance to the article, e.g. File:Bush discusses social security in Virginia 2005.jpg. I'm not arguing for less pictures – illustration is important. This image from Abu Ghraib specifically illustrates the torture that was a major aspect of Bush's presidency, and the image absolutely contributes to this.-Ich(talk)18:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Given that nobody replied or affirmed your reasoning above, it should remain out. This image from Abu Ghraib specifically illustrates that you have a non-neutral point of view regarding the subject of torture in connection with the G. W. Bush's presidency. Drdpw (talk) 20:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I'm still not certain what your argument against this photo's inclusion is, but I would like to ask you not to make assumptions about my views. NPOV means affording the RSs due weight; the RSs I cited describe the photo as "iconic" and "influential". The Abu Ghraib photos had a major, worldwide impact on public opinion of the Global War on Terror; this one in particular was widely reproduced. That these photos "elicited widespread outrage" has long since been included in the body text. This photo accurately illustrates that body text and helps the reader understand the public reaction.
I would actually argue the opposite of your point: arbitrarily excluding an iconic, suitably licensed image that is discussed in the body text isn't a neutral stance: it violates NPOV by deliberately eliding something RSs consider important. These images were a major event in Bush's presidency and leaving this out makes the article less complete.-Ich(talk)09:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Detainees upon arrival at Camp X-Ray, January 2002
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bush Dick Incident and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Bush Dick Incident until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)