User talk:FinixFighter

Proposed deletion of Shooting Star (film distributor)

Hello FinixFighter, I was unable to find significant independent coverage of Shooting Star (film distributor) so it seems that the subject may not be notable enough for a Wikipedia article yet. I have therefore proposed the article for deletion. If you disagree with that or are otherwise opposed to the article's deletion in any way, you should edit the page and remove the deletion tag from the page. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can see Wikipedia's notability guidelines, notability can be demonstrated by citing multiple reliable sources that discuss the topic in some detail. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hello, FinixFighter. Thank you for your edits, wherein you add short descriptions to articles (some of which I've seen on my watchlist). Could I ask you to please pay attention to the capitalization? The guidance at WP:HOWTOSD tells us to begin each entry with a capital letter, so, e.g., it would be Fishing tool instead of fishing tool at Spoon lure. Thanks, and happy editing. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnFromPinckney Thank you for the suggestion! I initially used capital letters, then the Wikipedia app (which I use for adding short descriptions) started to display me a warning about capital letters, that's why I was not using them anymore. But I'll use capital letters again now, thanks for your suggestion! User:FinixFighter 09:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the software tools are not always so well coordinated.

I just saw a discussion somewhere about how one tool (a bot, I think) was changing the template to (capital "S") while another tool was determined to use (small "s"), and they were just stepping on each others' toes. (They've resolved to both using "Short", BTW.) Best regards,— JohnFromPinckney (talk) 09:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi FinixFighter! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, FinixFighter. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bookdealer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bookdealer, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bookdealer

Hi. I've moved this article to draft, where you can work on adding a claim of notability before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 08:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ansley Watches (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ansley Watches and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ansley Watches, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FinixFighter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bookdealer

Hello, FinixFighter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bookdealer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello FinixFighter! Your additions to Vizio have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ansley Watches

Hello, FinixFighter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ansley Watches, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of stop motion films question

Hi, I saw your edit "This film is already present int the "live-action with stop motion features films" list" under the List of stop motion movies article and you're right, it is already in that category, but. I would argue that The New Gulliver is a stop motion movie with some (maybe 20%) live action sequences rather than a live action movie with stop motion sequences. Even the Wikipedia article for the movie describes it as a "Soviet stop motion-animated cartoon". I would like to hear you opinion regarding this topic.HotSpoto (talk) 17:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You're right, it's hard to decide such a thing and I had doubts myself in the past. My personal conclusion was that, generally, a person would use the main list (stop-motion feature) in order to search for films which are only stop-motion. Hence a film with a live-action sequence, even if not predominant in the film, would go in the live-action features. Anyway the main problem is always about where the limit is, since there are actually stop-motion features with live-action sequences of some seconds or minutes, maybe in the initial part of the film. What should we do in these cases? That's quite hard to decide. However, I don't know this particular film, but maybe you're right and we could move it in the stop-motion film if, as you said, the live action sequences are around 20% of it. FinixFighter (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I will watch the movie right now and calculate a somewhat precise estimate of the live action sequences over the length of the whole movie. I will edit this reply when I'm finished. Initial live action sequence: from 0:00:00 to 0:15:44. Few seconds of live action scenes are present throughout the movie (they amount to maybe 10 to 15 minutes). Final live action sequence: from 1:10:57 to 1:12:49. A rough 32 minutes are live action, hence the percentage of live action over movie length is about 45% (way off my initial estimate). I leave you the decision on which section to put this movie. Thank you for your time. HotSpoto (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]