Jump to content

Talk:Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by AirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 16 April 2024 (close GAR Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace/1 as keep (GANReviewTool)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Former featured articleStar Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleStar Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 1, 2007.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 21, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 27, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 31, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
October 4, 2006Featured topic candidatePromoted
October 28, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
November 6, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 14, 2008Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
January 18, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 17, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
April 22, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
April 16, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Actors

[edit]

Just noticed that tonights changes by 63.146.250.131 are just wrong. Alan Rickman, Jim Carrey and Cameron Diaz did not starr in Star Wars Episode I. The article was correct before... 185.198.228.148 (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

E.T. species in film

[edit]

Members of the E.T. species are in the film. More than enough sources, such as gamerant.com, digitalspy.com, cbr.com, complex.com, syfy.com, etc. --95.99.94.82 (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Episode I has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15 § Episode I until a consensus is reached. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A 2009 GA that currently has numerous citation needed tags, too many quotations, and a tag stating so in critical reassessment. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there. Igordebraga (talk · contribs) and I are fixing up the citation errors (including the dead ones) and maintenance tags where needed. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect thank you! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The citation needed tags have now been addressed and the legacy section has been rewritten. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.