Jump to content

Talk:Clerico-nationalism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ThaesOfereode (talk | contribs) at 21:47, 22 April 2024 (Assessed for quality and importance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Since this page deals only with clerico-nationalism in Quebec, I think that it should not be titled just as "Clerico-nationalism" . In accordance with its content, it should be moved to "Clerico-nationalism in Quebec". Main reasons are: 1. Terms "Clerico-nationalism" and "Clero-nationalism" are just variants of the term "Clerical Nationalism" (see pages: Christian nationalism and Religious nationalism), 2. As a political ideology, clerical nationalism was and still is present in many countries, 3. Sooner or later, we will have page for "Clerical nationalism", and pages like "Clerico-nationalism" will be redirected to that page. At this point, we should do this: move this page to "Clerico-nationalism in Quebec", and then redirect blank page "Clerico-nationalism" to page Christian nationalism that has developing sections for clerical nationalism in various countries. Sorabino (talk) 05:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Six years later, I strongly agree with Sorabino's arguments above. I would move the article to Clerical nationalism in Quebec. "Clerico-nationalism" is a generic term meaning clerical nationalism.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article is lacking context

[edit]

Assuming it is known or at least assumed in academic circles that clerico-nationalism in Quebec arose from certain socio-political conditions in Quebec's history, a history section is desperately needed. To simply enumerate the characteristics of something is hardly encyclopedic coverage worthy of Wikipedia. Further, the dynamics of the institution's decline, which may have involved the passage of laws, are worth covering as well. Anyone??--Quisqualis (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]