User talk:Teixant
|
Mozambique
[edit]I answered you on the talk page - first, you can research wikiproject countries, and second - the later administrative levels are described and referenced within articles and references like the politics templates, not on the first page. Please do not change this. Thank you. Rarelibra 12:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- In other words, you wish to go against the work that those of us (such as WikiProject Countries) are doing to standardize articles on Wikipedia. ALL countries have "administrative divisions" - but the wikiproject has the individual countries titled after the first and/or second (or third, in some cases - if the information is available) divisions - any further (fourth, fifth, and even sixth) are explained and titled elsewhere in the subdivision articles, not the main article. Please realize this. You don't have to disagree - but do your research first. Thank you. Rarelibra 14:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Democratic elections in Moçambique
[edit](In answer to your comment on my page)
I'm afraid I don't have any reference or citation however my recollection is that during the transition period there were multiple parties. Did any elections happened then?
Under Frelimo there were single party elections. People voted therefore they were (by some peoples definitions) democratic. Were these contested between multiple Frelimo canditates? Were candidates selected in open meeting with public participation?
Even under Portugal I believe they had elections. I think they may even have had some sort of faked up multi-party arrangement.
My personal belief is that the 1994 elections were more democratic than those that went before however neutral point of view requires that we describe the previous elections and the restrictions that applied so our readers know more about them and can decide for themselves if they want to label those elections 'democratic' or not. We can't just label them as not "democratic" when there isn't even a general accepted NPOV definition of what is or is not a "democratic" election.
Now where can we get hold of info on elections during the portugese period, the transition period and the Machel period?Filceolaire 09:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Mozambique
[edit]In case you haven't noticed mozambique is indeed one of the crappiest covered countries on wikipedia. Instead of moaning about it -do something about it!!!! Join Wikipedia:WikiProject Mozambique and help things improve!! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 12:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Nelinho article
[edit]Hello. I've noticed an edit war between you and User:Maracana on this article over the countyofbirth field. I don't agree with Maracana's approach to mass editing of these types of articles (without any discussion) but his view is that the infobox should identify the name of the country at the time of the person's birth. There has been a great deal of discussion about this (especially for former Soviet republics), and I believe the concensus is to use the name of the country at the time of the person's birth. In short, I don't think it's worth arguing with him about it (I've given up). Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Jorge Cadete
[edit]Sorry, I reverted your edit per WP:DATE, and not the whys or wherefores of the name of Mozambique. Peanut4 (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Jorge Cadete edit war
[edit]Hi there. The edit war at Jorge Cadete is getting a bit daft now. I've started a discussion on the talk page to try and come to a solution. Could we please try come to a solution so we can move forward. Peanut4 (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Estádio de Ferroviário
[edit]Sorry, I was on an editing binge (merging pages and verifying unsourced articles). I couldn't find any real reliable sources or any reason why it should be on wikipedia. If you care about the article, show you care by improving it! Kpstewart (talk) 01:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Mozambique Railway
[edit]Dear Teixant... seeking information on the performance of Vale in Mozambique, and on the transfer of locomotives EMD DDM45 from Brazil to Mozambique. Would have some information? Meloaraujo (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Corrections on the "Mozambican Civil War" article
[edit]Thanks very much for correcting my errors, some of which - to my shame - I should have noticed myself. I intend to continue work on this article, so I'd be grateful, if you could check my future edits, too. I'll try not to be too much work ;)
Kindly,
Rappatoni (talk) 23:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Freixo vs. Freizo
[edit]Hello Teixant. I wanted to let you know that I've reverted this edit. I perfectly understand what you say, but there's a policy of verifiability to follow, which is closely related to WP:VNT, and says that verifiability is preferred over truth. We cannot override the policies. Regards.--Jetstreamer Talk 21:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello TEIXANT, AL from Portugal,
please (please!) leave the article's intro as it is please. I agree with you without the technicalities, he was Mozambican. But, like Eusébio, he played for Portugal internationally, so he was a PORTUGUESE FOOTBALLER and a MOZAMBICAN HUMAN BEING, if you will.
We have to respect WP guidelines and rules. Besides, in the article's early storyline, it states exactly where he was born, so more to his Mozambican "status" there OK?
Happy editing and weekend --AL (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Portugal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 01:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Malawi claim
[edit]OK, but what about this then? I just acted according to what is said here. Malawi claims whole lake except the Mozambique's part and that is a dotted line in the image. Sorry, I didn't zoom the image. And that gives a reverse impression in the eyes. :-) Thanks for the correction. -- KWiki (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello again from Portugal Mr. Teixant (I was the one that left you the message titled "Mário Coluna", now I don't have an account anymore),
it's customary to leave the current name of the article in the wording (in this case Primeira Liga), I think not to mislead readers. You can ask here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football) to see that I'm not lying, and for the moment I have not re-reverted anything, it stays your way.
Also, I see you were offended by my use of "period" in the edit summary. Believe me, I was not being insulting or trying to belittle you, only being assertive, but I apologize for any inconvenience that may have occurred.
Happy editing --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I read it. The question I think you could/should pose was: "Should we hide the Primeira Liga wording (which is the current title for the WP article) when addressing a player that competed there when the competition had another name?" That's just an option.
Attentively --84.90.219.128 (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Teixant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Teixant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit] Hello, I'm BrownHairedGirl. An edit that you recently made to Bilene Macia District seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Teixant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Hello, I'm 2601:346:280:833:C8D8:D7A9:2A5A:CF8. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. needs to stop. YOu're running around undoing edits based on your opinions. YOu need to build a case for the edit. Most of recent ones would be simple to have a source. Some of them though are pure opinion. Stop. This is a form of vandalism. —Preceding undated comment added 17:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Edit warring
[edit]I see that you're trying to retain the current version, but it's best to use the Edi-warring noticeboard to report edit-warring users rather than going back-and-forth like that. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks @Ohnoitsjamie:, I wasn't aware of it. Regards Teixant (talk) 20:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Well @Ohnoitsjamie:, "they" did not give a chance to use your suggestion, instead blocked me, unfairly in my opinion, as I tried to dialog....maybe it is not worth to do it...Regards and thanks again. Teixant (talk) 08:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Wug·a·po·des 22:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Teixant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If you read the Mozambique's article talk page, you will see that I tried to dialog and explain why I was reverting the reverts, but I got no answer from the other user. I think that should matter when imposing punishments, but somehow I am not surprized. Thanks for your attention. Teixant (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You failed to achieve consensus for your changes. You are not permitted to engage in edit-warring to enforce your preferred version. I'll note that the other party was also blocked for one week. Yamla (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Mozambique Population
[edit]Hello Teixant
I noticed you reverted information that I removed about the "most populous city of Mozambique" - please support your reversion with source. Using the List of cities in Mozambique by population Wikipedia article, your information is not correct. I'd suggest you correct THAT page first then update the Maputo page with the appropriate citation.
P.S. I cannot access your regular user page. AP1MZ (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Need you to revise
[edit]I noticed you undid my edit. Inhambane zip code is 1300 where is 1703?
its a town can’t be founded
water area is 32 square km
please verify your sources because this is misleading info!
undo your edit or do some research Name is Tofo, Mozambique other name Tofo Beach native name is Praia do tofo InfoMoznow (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Don't make intentionally disruptive edits
[edit]Please do not make intentionally disruptive edits like this one again. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:Daniel Quinlan, I think that my edit was as disruptive as that one that changed Humanmade to manmade, don't you agree? Have you complained about it? Keep the good work! Teixant (talk) 14:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please focus on your own behavior. Other people misbehaving is not a reason to jump into the fray. Instead of making a disruptive edit, you could have restored the original text. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)