Jump to content

Talk:Van Halen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sladek (talk | contribs) at 18:02, 17 April 2007 (Roth wrote 'Jump'?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconRock music B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
Former good articleVan Halen was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 22, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 14, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 5, 2005Good article nomineeListed
March 31, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 3, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
Archive
Archives
  1. December 2002 – August 2005
  2. August 2005 – September 2005
  3. September 2005 – March 2006

Milestones

Date Notes
October 23, 2002 Article started
April 5, 2004 Article restructured into present format
April 18, 2005 Became Featured Article Candidate (Original FAC Page)
April 22, 2005 Failed FAC
August 22, 2005 Request for Peer Review in preparation for FAC resubmission
September 14, 2005 Peer review archived
March 12, 2006 Resubmitted for Peer Review


Posting David Lee Roth As A Current Member

I have put a disputed tag on the front page, even though the current version at the time of this writing is accurate. Vandals have repeatedly listed David Lee Roth as the current vocalist despite the fact that this is not verifiable, and there has been no official announcement. Stating that DLR is the lead vocalist based on what Billboard says may happen is , at this point, nothing more than wishful thinking! If DLR does re-join, put his name up after it's official.

It's official...take down the flag http://van-halen.com/pressrelease.html

To-do List

Van Halen has been evaluated according to the Featured Music Project criteria, most recently affirmed as of this revision. The article's most important issues are listed below. Since this evaluation, the article may have been improved.

The following areas need work to meet the criteria: Audio - References - Format/Style
The space below is for limited discussion on this article's prospects as a featured article candidate. Please take conversations to the article talk page.
  • Audio: Needs sound samples
  • References: Needs print and scholarly sources
  • Format/Style: Quite good overall, but the section headers and discography seem more complex than needed

Workspace/Storage Area

Please use this area to store any reference material or thoughts you would like to use in future edits. Create a sub-section with your username. This will enable us to keep the article clean and "in-production" while work is going on and let everyone see your thoughts which will help facilitate the collaborative process of expanding the article. If you need to lock the article for an extended period of time while you do edits, please us the {{inusefor|120 minutes (or whatever)}} template.

Credibility of the Rolling Stones Guitarist Ranking

First, Let me apologize if I am submitting this incorrectly; I hope this the misc discusion comment section. And I wish to thank whoever is guiding this article, you have done a great job.

My comment is about the reference to the Rolling Stones Ranking. The rankings in the Rolling Stones Guitarist list mentioned is widely regarded as one of the greatest jokes/insults in history of music pubs. Take a look a the list, and decide for yourselfand look up reactions to it around the net. You'll find that I am not exagerating.

Maybe you could add a more to the sentence that mentions the dubious nature of the rankings. I didn't want to do it outright, without asking, because it might have seemed like graffitti against Rolling Stone.

I will admit that as a guitarist, I am partial to Van Halen, but I'm sure anyone working on this article would be. Having said that, I will say that most of the rock fans around the world, and almost all guitarist would agree he would have to be in the top ten. And that's what initially piqued my curiousity about that list: that fact that Van Halen was #70.(!?!) I thought to myself, who are the 69 above him. When I looked up and read the list, I laughed out loud. Check out the list for yourself.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5937559/the_100_greatest_guitarists_of_all_time

I think he deserves proper representation, and mentioning that he is #70 on a dubious list is an insult, I believe. If I am making a big deal about something I shouldn't I'm sorry, but I really believe that list is silly.

t1n0 10:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)t1n0t1n0 10:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

More than ten million albums

"Van Halen is one of five rock groups that have had 2 albums sell more than 10 million albums in the U.S. (the others being: Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Eagles, Def Leppard, and KISS)".

This is only true for unusually large values of 5. Should it be say "six rock groups", or is one of the others wrong? Also this sentence might be clearer if the second occurence of "albums" was replaced with "copies"

Groups that have had two albums sell more than ten million copies in the U.S.

The Eagles have Hotel california 16xPlatinum, Their Greatest Hits (1971-1975 29x Platinum, and The Eagles Greatest Hits, Vol. 2 11x Platinum. The last two are compilations, the article does not specify, so either add the list or say studio albums.

good call, done Oreo man 17:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Discussion About Groups with Two Albums Selling 10 Million

The article currently reads: "Van Halen is one of seven rock groups that have had two albums sell more than 10 million copies in the U.S. (the others being: Led Zeppelin, Eagles, Pink Floyd, Metallica, Def Leppard, and The Beatles)." This is incorrect. First of all, Metallica does not have two albums that have sold 10 million copies. Their Live Shit: Binge & Purge video was certified 15x Platinum, but Platinum for a video is only 200,000 copies (thus it has only sold 3,000,000 copies). So Metallica's only 10-million seller is Metallica.


Led Zeppelin, The Eagles, Pink Floyd, Def Leppard, and The Beatles do have two 10-million selling albums. But so do 12 other artists (Bruce Springsteen and Billy Joel being the only other rock acts; there are 7 pop artists and 3 country artists).


Now, if you're only talking about studio albums (this means you're excluding live albums and greatest hits compilations) then Bruce Springsteen, Billy Joel, and The Eagles don't belong on the list.


So the sentence should be changed to one of the following:

  • Van Halen is one of five rock groups that have had two studio albums sell more than 10 million copies in the U.S. (the others being: Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Def Leppard, and The Beatles).

--OR--

  • Van Halen is one of eight rock groups that have had two albums sell more than 10 million copies in the U.S. (the others being: Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Def Leppard, The Beatles, The Eagles, Bruce Springsteen, and Billy Joel).


My research is based on this list [1]. Here is a complete list of all artists that have two albums that have sold 10 million copies:

  • Rock Artists
    • Beatles, The (3 studio albums, 3 greatest hits compilations)
    • Def Leppard (2 studio albums)
    • Eagles, The (1 studio album, 2 greatest hits compilations)
    • Joel, Billy (1 studio album, 1 greatest hits compilation)
    • Led Zeppelin (5 studio albums)
    • Pink Floyd (2 studio albums)
    • Springsteen, Bruce (1 studio album, 1 live album)
    • Van Halen (2 studio albums)
  • Pop Artists
    • Backstreet Boys (2 studio albums)
    • Carey, Mariah (2 studio albums)
    • Dion, Celine (2 studio albums)
    • Houston, Whitney (2 studio albums)
    • Madonna (1 studio album, 1 greatest hits compilation)
    • 'N Sync (2 studio albums)
    • Spears, Britney (2 studio albums)
  • Country Artists
    • Brooks, Garth (2 studio albums, 1 live album, 1 greatest hits compilation)
    • Dixie Chicks (2 studio albums)
    • Twain, Shania (3 studio albums)


How about AC/DC? Back in Black has sold 42 worldwide and 21 in the US, highway to hell has sold over 7 million in the US, given that they have sold 150 worldwide of which 68 (less than half) in the Us it is very unlikely that highway to hell has sold less than 3 million outside the US.


The number of albums sold outside the US is irrelevant. The statement only deals with US album sales. And Back In Black is AC/DC's only 10-million-plus seller.

Sorry, didn't read properly. If you do a bit of maths you realise that ac/dc must have at least another ten-plus million album worldwide.

I'd go with - "Van Halen is one of five rock groups that have had two studio albums sell more than 10 million copies in the U.S. (the others being: Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Def Leppard, and The Beatles)". This is because, strictly speaking Springsteen and Joel aren't bands. you could include them as seven rock ACTS I suppose. also, I read an interview with Def Leppards singer stating that he was proud to be a member of those 5 bands, no mention of Eagles, Springsteen or Joel 82.2.223.158 17:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orally shared Mammoth/EVH factoids

I was acquainted with original Mammoth member Dennis Travis in the late 1980s and early 1990s. He shared a few interesting Mammoth and Eddie Van Halen factoids with me. However, I can't back up any of them. Can I contribute these factoids, or do they not "pass muster?" -John Rigali 16:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I too was acquainted with Dennis, but I do not recall him claiming he was a functional member of Mammoth. I did see a picture of him with the brothers in a non-concert setting. If I recall, he was friends with the brothers when they were in their mid-teens and not during the Mammoth years. Gh228 23:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fact transplant from EVH page

There are some interesting (though largely uncited) facts on the Wikipedia EVH page which might be better situated here. I've moved them in and replaced them on EVHs page with a summary. Please don't randomly delete them just because they are uncited - I will work to get citations for these ASAP. Mikejstevenson 07:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Top Gun Theme

Steve Stevens played the Top Gun theme - absolutely nothing to do with EVH. Don't just write random bullshit when you don't know what you're talking about. This is an encyclopedia....Mikejstevenson 21:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Not true. Van Halen wrote the song and performed it for the movie. Don't know where your getting this Steve Stevens crap.[reply]

You need to check again...Steve Stevens & Jan Hammer played it. I've seen the video a million times back in the 80's Again...EVH had nothing to do with it. lgore69

Sass Jordan?

Shouldn't this article also mention canadian rocker Sass Jordan? Meaning; she was being considered by the Van Halen brothers as possibly the new singer for the band after Cherone's departure in 1996. I've only seen one mention of a comment regarding it by EVH, but Jordan was jamming on new material with the brothers at 5150 in the summer of 1996. I mean, Jordan and the Van Halens even discussed the implications of such an action. Doesn't all this warrant an inclusion to the article? What saith thee, WikiPedians? --Tirolion 23:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dang nabbit. I meant after the departure of Roth, and prior to the arrival of Cherone. You probably knew that, anyways. Btw, the linkage is here and here (just some of the gazillion links to the issue all around the 'net). This'd actually be the second time EVH would've considered a female singer for Van Halen. Patty Smyth, y'know. --Tirolion 06:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Flag change needed for the bros

Can someone change the flags back to American for EVH and bro. They trained and were U.S. citizens in the 70s in the band. I know it sounds minor but I want Wikipedia to succeed. 14:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC) -Ben

They were born in the netherlands so I think it is important that the Netherlands flag is there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.245.107.141 (talk) 14:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Good article Review of GA status

This article is being reviewed at WP:GA/R for possible delisting of its Good article status. Teemu08 20:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

In a unanimous 6 to 0 vote, this article has been delisted in a Good Article review. I'd be specific about what's wrong, except there were just so many concerns raised, it'd probably be faster just to read the discussion archived here: Wikipedia:Good articles/Disputes/Archive 13. Homestarmy 00:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral

The article states that "Cathedral" features a new guitar technique involving Eddie's use of the volume control while playing with his left hand. I don't believe this is true. Ritchie Blackmore was using this technique as early as 1970 (as can be heard on many live performances of "Mandrake Root" from the period, as well as the studio recording of "Fools" on Deep Purple's 1971 LP "Fireball"). Blackmore probably wasn't the first to do it either, but that's an example preceding "Cathedral" that springs readily to mind. I think that statement regarding the "Cathedral" technique being something new should be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew Turnage (talkcontribs) 00:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I have heard no evidence that Eddie Van Halen committed Suicide on March 9th by stab wound to his chest. Why does this keep comming into the cronolocic list in December 2006-present?

Roth wrote 'Jump'?

I can't believe more people haven't caught this:

The album's lead single, "Jump", featured a bouncy synthesizer hook and anthemic lyrics by Roth. Roth worked with then Yamaha product specialist (Yamaha DX-7) and sound designer Kevin Stratton to create the synthesizer hooks in "Jump." Stratton, a Peoria, Ill., native, and musical mastermind of the era took two weeks working with Roth to come up with the hook for "Jump." Although never credited Stratton's sound helped "Jump" became the band's first and only #1 pop hit and resulted in the band's first Grammy nomination.

Where did this come from? Sounds like fiction to me. Sladek 18:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]