User talk:Bryan Seecrets

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Bryan Seecrets Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Stilgar135 18:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Banned films#Malaysia

Bryan, I'm curious about your edits to Banned films#Malaysia. The factual content looks good (although I admit I haven't checked it for accuracy); however, you also added a couple of paragraphs of explanatory text that seem very point-of-view and biased in favor of Malaysian censorship. Was this your intent? I suspect that English is not your first language, so I want to find out what you were trying to say, before I try to recast those paragraphs into a less inflammatory tone. :) Thanks. (Reply on my talk page or Talk:Banned films#Malaysia section, please.) --Quuxplusone 23:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis

Yikes! Bryan, please don't copy text from http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Biographies+and+Profiles/Biographies/Jacqueline+Bouvier+Kennedy+First+Lady+1961-1963.htm and put it on Wikipedia, if you didn't write it. That's copyright infringement, and it's a very bad thing, legally speaking, which Wikipedia needs to avoid at all costs. --Quuxplusone 23:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation re: Star Trek: The Section 31 Files

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek (Fan made productions). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kirok of L'Stok 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But, Star Trek: The Section 31 Files is currently on hiatus after 3.05, possibly in favor of his original sci-fi tale, Far Horizons. --Bryan Seecrets 14:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it. Wikipedia is about verifiable facts, NOT opinions, wishes or ScuttleButt. If you can give a reference for your statement I will be happy to allow it to stand but you and I both know that you have been told that the only way that S31 will be put into hiatus is if you continue your campaign of misinformation. The same goes for ST Pioneers as well - get your facts straight before you post.--Kirok of L'Stok 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek fan productions, you will be blocked. --Kirok of L'Stok 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek fan productions, you will be blocked. Kirok of L'Stok 09:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I know, I just leave this alone. S31 is currently on hiatus, you haven't aware of it yet?!

Being in hiatus means that there is no work being done on the production and there is none planned for an extended length of time. Whilst it is true that there has been no episode for two months as against their usual one a month, you have to take into account that they released *two* episodes in December and, like most people, they took some time off over Christmas ... plus Eric is recovering from a serious car accident - weren't you aware of that? I happen to know that Mak has passed the files to Eric yesterday for post production. You have to be able to verify what you post and after your previous record I am not willing to accept ANY unverified material from you. You MUST give a link to something that verifies your posting, I can't stress that strongly enough. This is not a forum that deals in rumour and conjecture, it is an encyclopedia that deals in FACTS.

If you post inflammatory, unverified material one more time you WILL be blocked and the responsibility for this action will lie solely with you. YOU will have caused this to happen to yourself. I urge you NOT to do it.--Kirok of L'Stok 22:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't post inflammatory and unverified material as of now. --Bryan Seecrets 19:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently heard S31 has ended in a cliffhanger, isn't it true? --Bryan Seecrets 03:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan, you're having me on, aren't you? They've just posted a new episode THIS WEEK! Surely to goodness you aren't going to start so soon with your "are they ended?" posts as soon as they have published an episode? At least you have had the decency to post it on your User page instead of the Star Trek: Fan Productions article.--Kirok of L'Stok 08:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation - Laura Yonker

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Laura Yonker which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. RichMac (Talk) 00:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then how am I going to get an approval from the administrators before doing so --Bryan Seecrets 14:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Harriet_Owen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Harriet_Owen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malay Wikipedia

Please do not add interwikilinks for Malay articles unless they actually exist on the Malay Wikipedia. ms:Power Rangers, ms:Power Rangers: Zeo, and ms:Power Rangers: SPD do not exist.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea

[1]. —Centrx→talk • 14:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT

Hi, with regards to your edit to Clea DuVall, it's not necessary to add a sortkey to the categories if the template {{DEFAULTSORT:}} is present. For more info, see Help:Category#Default sort key. Hope this helps... Belovedfreak 22:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielle (Xena)

Hi. You added the following text to this article: " The origins of her name lies in the Xena Scrolls herself. Her name Gabrielle is neither originated from Greek, nor fit traditional Ancient Greek religious concepts, but it is rather than a French given name. It does, however, have a grammatically correct Greek feminine ending and contains no anti-Greek sounds (pronounced as Gab-ree-el-lay)."

Can you provide some references for that? I haven't heard of it before. Bards 15:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh. Yeah, see if I can do that. --Bryan Seecrets 02:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found a reference to that: A WOMAN OF DECEPTION: GABRIELLE???!

Thanks Bryan. Any objection if I rearrange the text, so that it reads better? Also, you can't quote all of that as a "fact", because even in that article some of it is the author's guesswork. Lastly, the scrolls are a fictional source; we shouldn't pretend they are real. Bards 20:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beast Fist

Do not add any unsourced speculation concerning the title of a series yet to finish in Japan and its adaptation in the States.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 16:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Butlerian Jihad edits

Hi. Sorry, but I just reverted your last edits to two paragraphs in the Butlerian Jihad article.

The changes to the first paragraph you edited did not make sense as English. The addition of the BG and Spacing Guild to the second paragraph did not really contribute that much (it is true that they developed in response to the disappearance of computers, of course) and distract from the main point of the paragraph, that Mentats are the main human replacement for "thinking machines". --SandChigger 02:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Raiden Fighters.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Raiden Fighters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apophis

Hi! Noticed you were advertising (maybe not the best word) your new game on Wikipedia, so I hopped over the the Sauer forums to read your post. It sound pretty interesting to me--but then again, some games sound interesting while they are very dull (and vice-versa). Any plans on setting up a web site? (SourceForge projects come with some kind of server thing, I think--consider SourceForge for project hosting.) Hope the game works out! (Oh, and also "Though its title referred only to the Egyptian mythological demon of darkness and chaos, it refers to the Greek name of Apep"? That's really confusing. Could you reword that?) — SheeEttin {T/C} 02:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is, but I can still say the game is still in early phases of pre-production and is currently part of the Sauerbraten game engine (alongside with Eisenstern and its FPS game module). The title refers to the Greek name of the Egyptian demon of darkness and chaos, Apep, in fact. Bryan Seecrets 07:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My web site for my game is here at: http://apophis-game.sourceforge.net/. Don't delete my Apophis article. Bryan Seecrets 09:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Emmy Rossum. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. --Yamla 14:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I do not want to add content without citing verifiable sources. Bryan Seecrets 14:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. Do not add content without providing a reliable source, such as you did to Emmy Rossum. See WP:V and WP:BLP. --Yamla 17:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop advertising your fan film all over Wikipedia. IrishGuy ^talk 19:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I have to read the NPOV tutorial and reliable sources before creating an article. Fan Wars[2] is not a fan film, but an open source film. Bryan Seecrets 19:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the description quite clearly states: Fan Wars is an open source film made by the fans, for the fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, and others. That is a fan film. IrishGuy ^talk 19:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fan Wars

Well, given that Fan Wars is a fan film and a re-imagining of the 1999 film of the same name, it should be similar to the 2008 film Fanboys, because it will be a feature-length open movie. I'm at Celebration in the rain, I've waited in line for the Star Wars special editions and prequels, as well as the anticipated Half-Life sequel, the future Star Trek productions, the 50th anniversary of Malaysia's independence and the Space Age. Making this film is very important to the world to me.

The film's page on Celtx Project Central is perhaps one of its reliable sources. Can I create that article on the film project I'm working on with no blatant advertising, but with neutral point of view, and reliable and verifiable sources? --Bryan Seecrets 07:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]