Jump to content

User talk:Silver Edge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Duhman0009 (talk | contribs) at 13:45, 18 May 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Silver Edge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 08:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Neo Roanoke

I want to talk about Neo Roanoke, a fictional character from Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny. Seeing that Neo is Mu La Flaga himself (revealed later on), I can only wonder about the reason that you insist to redirect it to List of Gundam SEED characters instead. --Blackhawk charlie2003 14:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Ocean Group AfD

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Ocean Group, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ocean Group. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Hello, Silver Edge! Thank you for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia. After you revert, I would recommend also warning the users whose edits you revert on their talk pages with an appropriate template or custom message. This will serve to direct new users towards the sandbox, educate them about Wikipedia, and a stern warning to a vandal may prevent him or her from vandalizing again. Thanks! Wavemaster447 03:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---Correction: I used the wrong template - sorry. What I meant to ask is that when you warn vandals, please do not give them all 4 warnings in the same edit. Also, please sign your name after the warnings. Happy reverting! --Wavemaster447 01:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gundam Seed characters

Thanks for the large amount of cleanup work you did on this. Edward321 13:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GSD

Can you tell me why you got rid os the chunk of text in the GSD article reffering to Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Club Yonkoma?--Tempest115 13:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling video games

In this modification, note that we need to duplicate the reference. The Disney sales must point to the archived version, because that is where the data is, while all the others must point to the current one. If we mix both references in one, it means we are using the archive for all of them, which is not true. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo 02:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have suggested a modification to the {{cite web}} template to add a parameter for dead references. Hopefully that will prevent having both a reference and a {{fact}} tag in the reference. -- ReyBrujo 02:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historico-medical categories?

Hi, I noted that you tagged a pile of categories beginning with "Historico-medical" for deletion as misnamed. I'm not contesting the tags (in fact, it meets CSD C2), but I'd appreciate it if you would tell me the new name(s) for the categories to be renamed, so that I can rename the categories rather than merely deleting them. Thanks, Nihiltres(t.l) 14:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

a lot. Cheers- CattleGirl talk 08:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of List of weapons packs in Gundam Series

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of weapons packs in Gundam Series, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of weapons packs in Gundam Series is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of weapons packs in Gundam Series, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi. I see that a vandal created your user page, and now it lies blank, with no content. Would you prefer that it be deleted? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Happy editing. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Case Closed

Please do not categorize it as detective fiction. This category is for the pages relevant to the genre as a whole (subgenres, etc). All particular instances (novels, stories, cartoons, anime, etc) are better categorized according to their media, thus Case Closed is in Category:Mystery anime and manga. Otherwise the category becomes unmanageable and useless. Thank you. Henry Merrivale 02:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling handheld video games

What you were doing was redirecting the article to the list page, so if anyone tried to click on the link, they'd just go right back to the list page. You literally had it linked to the page that was the link. HalfShadow 00:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copula tense and discontinued consoles

I've noticed you making reversions like this and this with the edit summary "all the other discontinued console articles uses 'was'". Have you ever checked that assertion? In fact, of the consoles listed on Template:Dedicated video game consoles, only Vectrex, NES, and SNES state "was a video game console" rather than "is a video game console". A few others have some variation on "was X's nth video game console", which is a statement of status rather than a simple category membership.

I don't particularly care whether you go through and change all the other articles to "was", or change the three to "is", or bring up the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games to get a wider consensus than just yourself. But please stop making false claims. Thank you. Anomie 11:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS3

I didn't change the number of units sold, if you look at the differences I only inserted 1080i into the hardware section. Thank You -- Vdub49 17:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

alright, my bad I thought you were saying I did, I misread it. -- Vdub49 22:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SM64

What is your problem? It is true, why did you erased that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.193.117.66 (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your edit summary was confusing and seemed to contradict with your edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Mario_64&diff=prev&oldid=166846565, and what do you mean by "it is the most downloadable title in the Virtual Console"? If by that you mean Super Mario 64 is the most downloaded title on the Virtual Console, then cite your source since it needs to be verified before being included. --Silver Edge 00:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Death Note "Forum"

Hi. I undid your edit to the talk page and posted a short response instead which politely discouraged turning the talk page into a discussion forum. I think we should be careful not to bite the newbies. I'm not sure this is what you had in mind, but I think this better handles the situation. Drumpler 08:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed that section because based on Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines: "Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal." I probably should of been more specific in my edit summary. --Silver Edge 02:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article

In the halo article I undid your revision because it looked "like" vandalism. I couldn't tell, as there were strange characters inserted in multiple places in your edit. If I was wrong then I apologize, just re-add what you had. businessman332211 04:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i saw your note when you did the re-undo. I apologize for the mistake, I looked through your contributions, and everything you done has been good so far. Again, apologies for the misunderstanding. businessman332211 04:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, these things happen. --Silver Edge 04:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If only there was a easier way to spot spaces being added in to an article in a diff. --Silver Edge 04:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chun-Li

  • Regarding the "See also" edit, I'm curious why you left Pocket Fighter. Cheers:) JuJube 02:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I see... just so you know, I don't oppose the edit (I actually think it's about time), I was just wondering if you left Pocket Fighter just so the Wikiquote template would have a place to hang around. If that was the case, I thought Street Fighter was probably a better link. JuJube 02:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Street Fighter stuff

The Minor Barnstar
For doing all the little changes to spruce up the Street Fighter (series) character articles.

JuJube 05:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contractions

The MOS applies to articles; welcome messages and help pages can follow more informal rules of usage. Λυδαcιτγ 05:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yun (Street Fighter)

List of Virtual Console games (North America)

It was Genesis in North America, not "Mega Drive", so please don't change it again. TJ Spyke 00:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the warm welcoming! :) Zombie007 (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on 7th gen

Thank you for catching my mistakes, reformatting my changes so they actually look good, and finding and rooting out those unsuspicious errors in the article, and of course all your vandalism reverts. It's really fun editing when you're online! clicketyclickyaketyyak 23:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasty Warriors

Whoops, thought I'd confirmed that sales figure was for the game, not the series. My bad. But I updated the Dynasty Warriors series article with an updated figure from Koei's corporate page. --Tntnnbltn 12:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I swore I did that. I must've been really off my game last night! Anyway, thanks. --Tntnnbltn 11:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

StarCraft series

You've got a point there, I adapted that part from the introduction of StarCraft, so it will need changing there as well. SC is certainly ranked up near the top of bestselling PC games, but it does need a reliable source for an exact statement of rank. How about the wording "one of the best selling PC games of all time", that acknowledges that its exact position is in flux, but still maintains that its in the top bunch. -- Sabre 11:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December, 2007

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The VG Barnstar
For all the little edits in just about every video games related article out there, and for correcting the grammatical errors that I unwittingly introduce, I award you this barnstar. Thingg (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling video game franchises

Hey, noticed your {{inuse}} tag while making a big change. Want to finish checking all the references, updating the accessdate for them, and transforming {{cite web}} to {{cite press release}} where necessary? I can continue adding some new franchise values I have around, all with between 5m and 9m units. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, took the franchise list to do that. Do you want to convert the full list of video games instead from one template to the other? -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, you can go top to bottom, and once I finish I can work bottom to top so that we don't clash. Put an {{inuse-section}} tag at the section you are working, and a {{underconstruction}} at the top of the article. That should prevent edit conflicts. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit, note that I chose those names because they were the ones found in List of Famicom games and the chronological lists, Chronological list of Famicom games, 1983-1988 and Chronological list of Famicom games, 1989-1994. If you plan on changing those names, please also change the ones in the lists so that whenever an article is created, all the lists point to the same one. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 07:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to StarCraft II

Please actually read the changes that were made before you revert them and ask for a citation. The change in question was just a rewording that was needed because a new year has arrived.

209.94.133.40 (talk) 15:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Why is The NES Files (www.nesfiles.com) considered link spam? It links to quality NES manuals(PDF scans that took hundreds of man hours to scan one by one!) for download-- providing quality content to users of Wikipedia. I have tried linking for individual games as well and these are removed as well, although other similar links remain(neshq.com, mobygames, etc.). Please allow my quality non-spam links or delete all other external links as well. Consistency is all I ask for. Thank you.

Dkalweit (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)dkalweit[reply]

I reverted your addition of the nesfiles.com link as per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, WP:External links#Advertising and conflicts of interest, and WP:Spam#External link spamming, since adding nesfiles.com links to the "External links" section of articles are the only substantial edits you have made up to that point, causing me to believe you have a conflict of interest; although, I will be more than happy to be proven wrong. Also please do not mark edits as minor when they are not, based on Help:Minor edit. Happy editing! --Silver Edge (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

The Minor edit page clearly says adding links qualifies as a 'minor edit'. Maybe this page is unclear about external links.

I fail to see how adding linked quality content that the target user of the page will be interested in(manuals for the games on the system; or the specific game manual on appropriate pages) is link spam-- regardless if anything else was added to the page itself. My quality addition to Wikipedia is links to the manually scanned PDF manuals of the games. Most sites only offer inferior text versions of the manuals. Thinking about it from the end-user perspective, I can't see how your position on this specific situation helps them.

Dkalweit (talk) 14:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gundam Seed SE

Since you seem to be Gundam Seed's main editor, I'll ask here. For the special editions, Bandai has been releasing them as Movies. Do you think we should rename the articles to "Mobile Suit Gundam SEED: Movie" (the Destiny SE as well) to match what Bandai is calling it? Also, thanks for copy editing my stuff. Rezumop (talk) 03:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I believe there was no Aussie or UK release because there's nothing on their website. The name on the Japanese Sunrise site is "Special Edition" but Bandai named it "Movie". Rezumop (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Special Edition is the official title seen here. 機動戦士ガンダムSEED スペシャルエディション romanized is Kidou Senshi Gundam SEED Supesharu Edishon. I guess Bandai changed it to match the name of the original Gundam movie. Rezumop (talk) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Durandal article

I'm not sure what sources you are looking for on the Durandal's politics section. You add a tag that there are no sources, and then proceed to delete sources posted in the section. This puzzles me because the source is NOT a wiki but the quote IN the wiki which is in fact directly from the series. So, the source is actually the series itself.

The series shows Durandal looking looking at the Destroy in either Phase 27 or Phase 28. So, I'm removing the tag until some sort of rationalization is provided. I did add one source though, but I'm sure you'll delete that one too since it isn't 'official' :P

I mean by its very nature a lot of this stuff CAN'T have a source because there isn't much official documentation provided on characters like Durandal. Therefore, I think simply referring to the series is itself sufficient. 69.243.158.192 (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Hey, thanks for the barnstar. Happy editing! P.S. I'm looking at submitting PlayStation 3 to FAC after it gets GA, which I nominated earlier today. (I'm pretty sure it will pass. It is reasonably well written and is better cited thn any article I've ever seen. (179 citations that take up approx. 32KB) Anyway, thought I'd let you know. Again, thanks for the barnstar. Thingg⊕⊗ 20:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS3

I know you do a lot of work on the PS3 article, and I thought you should know it became a Featured Article today. Keep up the good work!!! J.delanoygabsadds 03:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CS. banning

I didn't see it. Thank you! --Usien6 (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PlayStation 3

Thanks!!! Happy editing! *disclaimer* The previous two words were shamelessly plagarised from the great Silver Edge */disclaimer* Thingg⊕⊗ 04:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I award you the pictureless and templateless Barnstar of Tirelessly COntributing to the Pokemon Mystey Dungeon 2 Article! This is a barnstar, really, I mean it... Kimera Kat (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

Where do you suggest we can the ratings sources when we take them from the Chinese pages of Wikipedia. Plus, even if we were to find the sources on the ratings for this year. Where do you suppose we'll get it from the years before. The pages with the ratings would have already expired. Wikipedia has policies, and one of them is to ignore all policies when appropriate. I think it would be appropriate to that now. This message is based on your edits on the List of TVB series (2008), List of TVB series (2007), List of TVB series (2006) articles. --Shaggy9872004 (talk) 05:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re

As I've said, if you're following rules - great! no problem, what you're doing is what I'd be doing under those circumstances. However wikipedia has a rule called "Ignore all rules and you can view that if you want to. Under these circumstances, what we're putting down is not malicious or an issue of copyright, we're ttrying to build a better online encyclopaedia. Sure, it would be better if we had a source, but not all are obtainable. Assume good faith and be bold when editiing is just to of the phrases I can describe this little bit. I think that for the better of wikipedia being a better article in all, we'd better leave this matter at that, what do you think? Give me a reply soon.--Shaggy9872004 (talk) 07:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2nd gen N-Gage specification

You have recently reverted one of my edits on the N-Gage page stating the source I provided isn't "official enough". In such a case - can this be considered an official source? It states that N-Gage is a gaming service. Further in the article it mentions the word "platform". Also the dispute whether the new N-Gage games are considered mobile games or handheld game console games is present. I myself however would classify the new N-Gage closer to mobile game market than to handheld game console market since this time N-Gage isn't a dedicated device but more of a service similar to Xbox Live. Speaking of Xbox Live: the new N-Gage in combination with it's online component - the N-Gage Arena - can be considered akin to the likes of Playstation Network or the mentioned Xbox Live because of it's nature. --IJK_Principle (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPD

Actually, NPD usually does release their sales info every month. TJ Spyke 06:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the last year, I only recall 1 time we didn't get the monthly NPD report from NPD Canada. TJ Spyke 08:37, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big_Brain_Academy:_Wii_Degree

I noted the gameguide tagged placed on Big_Brain_Academy:_Wii_Degree and read the suggested guidelines. I discussed my newfound knowledge at Talk:Big_Brain_Academy:_Wii_Degree#Platinum_Medals and have removed the specific scoring requirements from the paragraph in question. Can you revisit the article? Regards, --Daddy.twins (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slim and Light

You shouldn't have moved it in the first place. Not only is it spelled incorrectly, the page title ends with a period, which isn't standard for Wikipedia content. Sony refers to the model in the PAL territories as the Slim and Lite. Not Light. --GSK (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well first of all, I'm not the one that moved PlayStation Portable Slim and Lite to PlayStation Portable Slim and Light., so please assume good faith. I'm in the process of getting it moved back to the correct article name at WP:RM#Uncontroversial proposals. Copy and pasting the text is the incorrect way of moving it back to the correct article, see WP:MERGE#How to rename a page. --Silver Edge (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was the on who misspelled 'lite' and ended the title with a full stop. I was reverting the previous vandalism to the title, and the correct original title wasn't available for reference within the page so I retyped the title. My mistakes were not deliberate vandalism. Sorry for the confusion. Derekhtodd (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iam sorry

I was not available for 1 month due to me being in hospital. Coming to the table. I dislike the original laid table it is ugly and it is not at all clear. The new table is clean and well laid out. Sure making a small mistake can cause table to go haywire. I guess people like you wanted to go easy not harder. The table is meant to be harder for new ones. It was difficult for me at first now it is nothing. Fine. Go to 2008 in film users over there is having no problems on editing. I do not know why you 3 of your buddies are having this problem in editing. Fine you have have your changes iam leaving so your 3 buddies and you can have fun with it. Also remember this point before i leave. The new table is clear, it is well laid out, genres can be removed, overall the table is perfect in all possible ways. I created the table for changes in 2008. --SkyWalker (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No italics

there is no need to use italics. Metzelder Siow (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy Tactics

This source is acceptable. See Final Fantasy magic (and its talk page) for a precedent. FightingStreet (talk) 14:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion template documentation

Hi, Silver Edge! I see you've made some changes to a number of templates such as Template:Db-g2/doc. I don't understand everything about how these templates work, so I don't know whether your changes are constructive or not. Would you please do me a favour and explain the reasons for your changes at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Suggested new wordings for CSD templates? Thanks! --Coppertwig (talk) 20:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mario Kart Wii. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —Locke Cole • t • c 21:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I do not see evidence that Silver Edge is in an edit war. People keep adding information that has no source given. Anyone has a right to remove such content. Also, for it to be a revert war, Silver Edge would have to be reverting the same person over and over, which he is not. J.delanoygabsadds 20:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NFSU2

Need for speed under ground 2.

Edit war.

In the space of Just 5 Minutes you made a LOT of edits.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.141.163 (talk • contribs)

Well there's a difference though, I'm trying to improve the Need for Speed: Underground 2 article with my numerous edits, while your numerous edits violate WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:GAMEGUIDE. [1] You're also on the verge of violating the WP:3RR. --Silver Edge (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, editing an article numerous times in a short period of time, especially when I was copy editing it to conform to guidelines, is not what you call an "edit war". However, the numerous edits you made to the Need for Speed: Underground 2 article (such as spamming and blanking) that were all reverted by myself and four other users, which in turn you went and violated the WP:Three-revert rule by reverting our reverts, is considered editing warring and vandalism. --Silver Edge (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N-Gage 2

A little question: I wonder whether N-gage Neo article should be deleted. I'm asking since Ngage 2 is redirecting there and it would be better to use it for a redirect to N-Gage 2.0 article. Thanks. IJK_Principle (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a general note

Thanks for your work on SSBM. Much appreciated. Ashnard Talk Contribs 08:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flagicon

In video game releases, some others use the {{flagicon}} tag. {{vgrelease}} may not work, so use {{Flagicon}}. 31Gabe 11:15 16 March 2008

Response

Rather than throw all of these fact tags around, as I notice that they are not used consistently, why not just say that the section itself needs citation? GoldDragon (talk) 03:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gran Turismo 5 Prologue

"Hasn't the game been released in Japan?" yes it has in japan and asia but the "future game" tag is about "article" or "sections" upon a future game, there are not 60 cars in the released version no BBC top gear etc, but it will be available in the PAL/US version hence the tag until march 26 and the PAL issue. Cliché Online (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edits on Lunamaria and Shinn

With all my respect, could you please provide me with more details for your reasons in this subject? from my side I could put forward all my arguments. It could fall into NOR policy (of course, as character reasons could not be cited as 'fact' unless they themselves clearly put it forward), but as it is clear psycholodgical conclusion - I am not sure how much of research is here?

OK, let's try to do it together: if we'll add only that fact that Lunamaria is far less infantile than two other girls Shin tried to protect - will it be acceptable? If we'll qoute, that even returning from being uncoscious on the Moon he still address to Stellar before Luna? If we'll say that Luna's motion to Shinn is still looking quite strange, even with blaming Logos?

And what I would argue in any way with acceptability of referral to NPOV policy here. As you can see - I did not say anything like that Shinn is stubborn, or whatever. (You could not even know my true views on him, Luna, or othe caracters). His idefix on protection is shown quite clear and out of doubts: he justifies _all_ his actions with this word. Well, if it is again the Original Research... isn't it obvious? All I want to add is at least show, that their affection is looking quite strange for many people and tried to help them to understand the reasons. OK, maybe presenting reasons itself is not acceptable as we could not cite it from any other more reliable source.

Can we try to make this subject clear and according to policies together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gellemar (talk • contribs) 01:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Nintendo 64 to Featured Article status

I am aiming to improve Nintendo 64 to Featured Article status, and I noticed that you have edited the article substantially recently. If you have time, please help out by contributing to the article. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 06:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

improving Nintendo GameCube to Featured Article status

I am working on improving Nintendo GameCube to Featured Article status, and noticed that you made a substantial number of contributions to the article recently. If you have time, please help out by improving the article. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Half-Life (video game) to Featured Article status

I am currently improving Half-Life (video game) to Featured Article status and noticed that you have made substantial contributions to the article recently. If you have time, please help out by improving the article however you can. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 00:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass to Featured Article status

I am improving The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass to Featured Article status and noticed that you made substantial changes to the article recently. If you have time, I would be delighted if you could help out with this project. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong company infos !

Maxis is dead since they are in EA, since 2007 the Maxis logo was removed from The Sims franchise ! It's no longer Maxis but it's EA Games only. You can try to visit the Maxis official site, it was shutdown and redirected to Spore site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.247.125.69 (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?

Recently, I have been doing some editing on the Summon Night: Twin Age page. It would appear that you have tagged some of my character descriptions with an unwikipedialike tag for saying they present information which would have been better suited to a game guide. What was your reason for doing this, and how can I fix it?Emma Hordika (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Video games notable for negative reception

An article that you have been involved in editing, Video games notable for negative reception, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video games notable for negative reception (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Valtoras (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vgrelease

Yes, but I thought it would be better to have less calls to the same template. Is there somewhere where it says that the dates have to be chronological? MrKIA11 (talk) 14:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS3 sales

Hello. I reverted your reverting of me on the PlayStation 3 article, and I wrote an explanation on the talk page. If you want to revert back, I won't outright oppose it, but I do think it's better to use Sony's official numbers. Bye. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 360

Hello. Sorry about that, I logged in at school and somebody hjacked my account and edited things. I will refrain from such things especially logging in at school. Lil_AzZa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil AzZa (talk • contribs)

Grand Theft Auto 4 & Prince of Persia Edits

I did not change these links, if you'd look at the history of them you'll see that I was the first person to post the information on that page as well as the source, which is reliable. There's proof for each one, so I don't get why you consider it unreliable. I just don't think it's fair that I can come on here, post something original and worthwhile, include a reliable source, and keep having my links changed around. There's no reason for it. If I'm the first person to post it and include a source with proof, that should be enough to make sure that my entry doesn't get changed. Google 'grand theft auto 4 ps3 downloadable content'. What's the first thing to pop up? Type in 'grand theft auto 4 multiplayer ranks' what's the first thing to pop up? I'd appreciate it if you changed everything back to it's original state.Blazedgoldfish69 (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All i was is increasing everness for that article. All i see is just a revert. So when i saw only people do what i have done no one reverts them. Just mine. How unfair. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wii Fit

In general, a video game article should use the official release date and not the in-store date, if two separate dates are announced.

Noticed the term "In general", this means that exceptions do exist. Wii Fit will ONLY be available at the Nintendo World Store in NY, leaving the rest of NA waiting for the 21th. If that's not part of the exception, I don't know what is.

Duhman0009 (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Silver_Edge&oldid=213243488"