Welcome To Your Extended Channel...

; Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2; Archive 3; Archive 4; Archive 5; Archive 6; ;

"Good Luck!"

Where to

Shaggy if your interested I've put together a page of questions so that I can see what you do/dont know from there I'll be able to offer some specific advice on areas to focus on. User:Gnangarra/Sandbox/Q's/Shaggy has been created just answer the question as best you can where you dont know say so. Gnan garra 04:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gnangarra/Sandbox/Q's/Shaggy#Discussion_Pages I left some comment there, can you expand the discussion pages, these are the areas that at RFA editors will be looking to see participation. what we can do is pick one and we'll look at how it works. Gnan garra 09:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you create a generic email account with someone like gmail. Gnan garra 00:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" to User talk:J Di

J Di is not vandalising his talk page, he simply has a policy of not removing other people's vandalism from his talk page, and reverting any removals, hence his message at the top "please do not remove or revert messages that appear to be vandalism". He has not vandalised his own page. Please consider taking back your warnings, thanks. ^anemone│_projectors 14:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: References

Where does the Chinese version of those articles get the ratings from? Cause those Chinese articles didn't cite sources and other Wikipedias can't be used as sources as per Wikipedia:Verifiability: "Articles and posts on Wikipedia may not be used as sources." --Silver Edge (talk) 05:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I won't pursue this any further. --Silver Edge (talk) 08:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heart of Greed

I get what you mean now, go on, you might even want to push for GA status. Dengero (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

I do not think Linda's name should be put in the main credits because she belonged to the peripheral part of the story. If people like Raymond, Tavia, Michelle Yim etc. do not get their names on the main actors' list, I do not see why this should be the case for Linda Chung.

Neither did I delete information pertaining to the story. Like I mentioned earlier, I deleted biased evaluation of the character.

Also, you will restrict your comments to what I have done is related to Heart Of Greed, not what to do. I'm sorry, are you qualified to tell me how to do things? Because I don't think so, this is not your personal webpage/crusade, and it comes off as extremely obnoxious. This is your first warning.

--Avrillys (talk) 06 06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Supertriosupreme.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Supertriosupreme.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westfield Doncaster

heyy i agree that dicksmith is a large retailer, but if you havent been to the actual thing at doncaster, it is relatively small compared to other large retailers such as jb hifi and is in osme cases smalelr than other small retailers such as glue store and the newsagent but i guess i wont change it cos u hav a point ther, ur choice bye mate Thfrang 11:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC) ps. r u from melb or sumwher else?

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For tirelessly working on pages for Hong Kong TV series'. Even I admit, it's a ridiculously repetitive job. Dengero (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hi, I noticed your contributions to various TVB articles, so I'm wondering if you'd be interested in contributing to WikiProject Modern Chinese music. There's been discussions about revamping the Wikiproject to include Chinese TV and film, but it kind of died off... so I'm trying to gather interest again to get the thing started. Would you be interested? Skyezx 06:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for taking so long to reply, but yep, the WikiProject will cover Chinese TV... film is, for the time being, still under WikiProject Films. However, the WP has been renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Chinese-language entertainment, and should include everything else, from music, TV, to actors, singers, etc. If you're still interested, you can head over there and sign up... and watch the talk page for discussions. The WP is still a bit shaky, but there are some active members that are willing to particpate in discussions. Hopefully, we can get a project going soon and maybe work together to get some articles (like TVB or maybe even Heart of Greed) to GA status. I know, I dream big. =p Skyezx ^(talk) 04:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Westfield.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Westfield.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MrHarper (talk) 23:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane Lions

Thanks for your comments. Basically, Wikipedia is not a repository of everything. WP:NOT. especially what can be easily found elsewhere. at the moment, you've included up to 2005, but where do we stop? 2002? and also we need to be consistent with other AFL club articles. also you will note the policy In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader this does not appear. As a guide, I'd suggest you look at some football club (I know they're not AFL) featured articles such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leek_Town_F.C.#Statistics_and_records or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusaders_%28rugby%29 thanks Michellecrisp (talk) 06:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is neccessary for this info to be displayed if there is need of it, at the moment, there is. That is your opinion. I don't think you've demonstrated the need. as I said you previously provided no context for this in the article. Someone scanning it through it like me, wonders why season stats from the last 3 seasons are in the middle of the article. Michellecrisp (talk) 07:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's better, thanks for your cooperation. Have a good weekend. Michellecrisp (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for List of Heart of Greed episodes

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Heart of Greed episodes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Heart of Greed episodes. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at 22:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject TVB

Shaggy9872004,

I see that you are working very diligently on the TVB related articles. Therefore, I have an idea. Should we start a Wikiproject namely "WikiProject TVB"? You can invite other Wikipedia members to join. Please reply. Thanks!

Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at 17:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use, Moonlight Resonance

Hi. :) The article Moonlight Resonance was listed at the copyright problems board with respect to the plot summary copied from this source. Given your note in edit summary here, I wanted to just drop you a personal note to explain my removal of this material. In our non-free content guidelines, the section titled "acceptable use" explains a bit when quotations may become infringement. You're quite correct that sources must be cited and authorship attributed. But even if we cite, attribute and properly mark the text, we can't use too much of material in order to comply with fair use. (For a good external site overview of copyright, you may want to visit Stanford University's site.) We can only use brief quotations from a source (determined by ratio to overall size) as necessary to supplement our own text. Of course, you're welcome to base a new plot summary written in your own words on that site and may include brief quotations from it if necessary. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou!

Thankyou for your award ^^ Dengero (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of ongoing discussion

There is a discussion relating to the actions of User:Brisbanelionsfan1, at the Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard. As you have been involved in an editing dispute on the Brisbane Lions article I thought you might want to comment. Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 12:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Westfield.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Westfield.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Matt Tilley

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Matt Tilley. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Tilley (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (film)

You consult the Talk Page should you wish to take part in the discussion on the moving of this article. You do not move it without the input from others and until a valid conclusion is reached. Hallows Horcruxes (talk) 10:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrisLionsDesign.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BrisLionsDesign.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. LGA _talk^edits 21:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2010 Brisbane Lions.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2010 Brisbane Lions.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:50 points scene in MR.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:50 points scene in MR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 06:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:We're Moving.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We're Moving.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucky- The Wedge DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucky- The Wedge DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:That's Valid.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:That's Valid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thanks For Coming.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thanks For Coming.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HOGDVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HOGDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MRDVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MRDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of upcoming TVB dramas

The article List of upcoming TVB dramas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources to support this as a WP:LISTTOPIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of upcoming TVB dramas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of upcoming TVB dramas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of upcoming TVB dramas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2007 TVB

Template:2007 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2008 TVB

Template:2008 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]