Jump to content

User talk:Alextrevelian 006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alextrevelian 006 (talk | contribs) at 03:30, 23 June 2008 (request unblock). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello Alextrevelian 006, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  BlankVerse 14:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I was looking at your userboxes and saw that you are gay and single and wished you had a boyfriend. Do you have an email account so that we can talk? Dustihowe (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted a bunch of crap

I dont wanna see my mistakes anymore xD For the record, this are the topics and the posters

  • Image:Hollywood Sign.jpg

14:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Image:MMGLMk1.jpg

Tronno ( t | c ) 00:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C) 18:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • License tagging for Image:Aniger pda.jpg

OrphanBot i cant belive that im such a n00b that a robot needs to remind me of the damm copyrigth tag

--ometzit<col> 15:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AA player number

The game's homepage misleads with the "total registered players", because it actually refers to the total number of accounts. However, the older a game, the less that number has meaning. After over four and a half years, the vast majority of accounts is not used anymore. Accounts were abandoned, banned, automatically created, created as an additional account by one player, or never used at all. There are a lot more reasons why this number cannot tell us the actual amount of players. If you want to compare the popularity, simply look here: http://archive.gamespy.com/stats/ For the real amount of players, one might try to combine statistics such as from aaotracker. On the left-hand side in the middle, there's a "Buddylist" which tells us how many players currently playing are registered with aaotracker and how many aren't. Only ~43% are not registered. This service claims to have ~336,000 active registered players. If we add the number of unregistered players, it results in almost half a million regular players. Way too high, because that would mean only 1.2% of the regular players are currently playing and the average time a player plays per day is less than 20 minutes. americasarmy.com even claims 116 h/day in 30days average playtime, which would mean 3.8 hours a day, would it not? This would lead to 37 thousand regular players when combined with the number of currently playing players (I used 6000). Unfortunately, statistics are often wrong or labeled wrong. For example on homepage of aaotracker it reads "those registered players have logged over 3 BILLION player rounds, nearly 2 million player hours, and over 1100 Fan Sites have registered for our community listing." A player is lucky to play 15 rounds in an hour, but 1500 rounds/hour is nonsense. I personally estimate the true number of active players between 40 and 70 thousand players. Hope I could help you. --Theodore Witness 22:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:Image:Aniger pda.jpg

Your request is pending on deletion review. The review will normally run for five days. If you need it more urgently, why? GRBerry 02:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alex. Thanks for the kind note, but it was actually User:Dragons flight who undeleted Image:Aniger pda.jpg. Credit where it's due! Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- MarcoTolo 03:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colombian peso

It looks like you're going to upload some images. Just a kind reminder, if you upload image to Commons, the same image can be used on Wikipedia of all languages. Thanks. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The images are in commons to use them in eswiki. also the original file is also in commons--ometzit<col> 01:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ummmmmmm i had no idea that the currency infobox existed that would save me the whole afternoon i spend doing that table lol. but thnks for doing it (Ummmmmmmmm)--ometzit<col> 03:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you're an expert on Colombian matters. May I point you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style/Currency article. It has detail example and guide for currency articles. Your help is definitely appreciated. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

K310 Article

Thanks for re-designing the K310 article... with my limited english skill I can only able to make a short one. Good Job!

Ali Wardhana 09:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby WikiProject

I've formed a WikiProject dedicated to the improvement of Kirby articles. If you're interested in participating, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Kirby's Dream Land. Thank you. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to that page have unsourced claims. So, per WP:SOURCE, it must be removed.Canaima 23:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Mike B. Anderson
George Maciunas
Jet age
Colombian Liberal Party
Maria Full of Grace
BBMak
Aspirator
Polyphonic ringtone
Mario Laserna Pinzón
The Day the Earth Stood Stupid
Colombian presidential election, 2006
Selective fire
Bender Gets Made
Collateral Damage (film)
Personal defense weapon
Proof of Life
Pollux (star)
The Band Concert
National police
Cleanup
I Dated a Robot
Anthology of Interest II
Colombian Constitution of 1991
Merge
Unfabulous
Young
Mass in special relativity
Add Sources
Hospitality service
Social network service
Ernesto Samper
Wikify
Moe's Tavern
Jerky Boys
Christa Schröder
Expand
Luis Carlos Galán
Carlos Lehder
Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 07:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uribe

I suggest you add the copyedit corrections made by 72.78.187.193, which you removed when reverted quite far back. They make sense and do not seem to be related to the other anonymous IP. In the meantime, I will keep the page on watch and would semiprotect if there is more trouble. Saludos, --Asteriontalk 21:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I think it´s done, please tell me if somethings is missing.--ometzit<col> 01:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hola. Gracias para reportar 200.118.51.112 a WP:AIV. Vi que tendrás un error con la plantilla. Usaste el texto Hi. Thanks for reporting 200.118.51.112 to WP:AIV. I noticed you are using the reporting template incorrectly. You used the code:
{{vandal|User:200.118.51.112}}: Edition on the [[Alvaro Uribe]], adding of libelous comments. He is the same User:200.105.54.149 who was blocked yesterday for the same edits after violating 3 revert rule.--[[User:Alextrevelian 006|ometzit<col>]] 21:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
pero es mejor usar: but it is better to use:
{{ipvandal|200.118.51.112}}: Edition on the [[Alvaro Uribe]], adding of libelous comments. He is the same User:200.105.54.149 who was blocked yesterday for the same edits after violating 3 revert rule.--[[User:Alextrevelian 006|ometzit<col>]] 21:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
—dgiestc 21:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another format

Is there any other format that I can use for audio files? WavePad cant save my file in ogg (i have the codec, i just dont know why its not letting me save it)--ometzit<col> 04:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:AUDIO, I don't think so. Real96 04:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys that worked: --ometzit<col> 04:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading this image, but how do you know it's a free image. Please state a source saying that it's free in the image description, or I will have to report it for copyright violation. Thanks. --Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 02:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It´s from one of those pages that offer these kind of gif without restrictions. i have it already for some time, but i dont remember where do i get it hit emo animations or something like that and see if u can find it. compare with the gif obtained from http://www.gifs.net/ that User:DVD_R_W have in his page.--ometzit<col> 04:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, links to blogs are inappropriate per WP:EL, even if the title is related to the subject of the article. Veinor (talk to me) 03:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banned Books.

I think that the edits you reverted from List of banned books was legit. I have reverted and sourced them. Jvbishop 12:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo.

Whats up? You seem cool.

Yo. 2

  • Currently hitting up*

Deletion of Page

Can any available admin delete the subpage User:Alextrevelian_006/The_Selector? I was using it to start a article and improve it a little bit before submitting, but the info was kinda easy to find so I end up submitting it as The Selector and leaving it as a stub. Thanks! --ometzit<col> 03:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked User:JohnReaves on IRC and he deleted it for you. Cheers. Real96 03:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm following disambiguation guidelines. Specifically this part... Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link. Including more than one link can confuse the reader; including no links at all makes the entry useless for further navigation. MahangaTalk 16:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MySpace Features

I'm glad you like the MySpace Events page. I know that you want to put a TV on demand page but i think it would be appropriate somwhere else and would like you to start MySpace Features for more info go to the discussion page of MySpace Events. Martini833 02:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well a MySpace features page it would be really advertising, cuz at the end the TV on demand it´s advertising. However, i would agree with a Myspace features section in the myspace page. I agree with the MySpace features because it´s remarkable the use of internet to promote underground artist and stuff, but yeah the features deserve a subsection, a whole page it would be treated as advertising --ometzit<col> 02:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Emo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Emo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 08:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Emo.gif

Image:Emo.gif: Since you are refusing to provide info, the image is deleted. `'mikka 04:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for temporal undeletion

I need a temporary undeletion of the file Image:Emo.gif, in order to get myself a backup. BTW, I know that this is not the use of the helpme template.--ometzit<col> 01:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that would be allowed, but you can try speaking to the admin who deleted the file (In this case, Mikkalai) or if that doesn't work, you can try a Deletion Review. For that reason, though, I'm afraid you may be out of luck. Hersfold (talk/work) 02:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bogota_45_con_7.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bogota_45_con_7.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Angry face.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Angry face.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Typo redirect Hips dont lie

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hips dont lie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hips dont lie is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hips dont lie, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The_passion_of_the_jew.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_passion_of_the_jew.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 02:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:La ponti.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:La ponti.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:SebuscaBush.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SebuscaBush.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bloc Party - Helicopter.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloc Party - Helicopter.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked for one month for violating Wikipedia's BLP policy on Twink (gay slang). A simple glance at the edit history or the talk page of the article would have shown you that adding an image of a person who has not self-identified as a homosexual, let alone a twink, is unacceptable. Neıl 18:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|First, adding the image again was made thinking about a possible accidental deletion. Second, in short, the image describe someone who falls in the description of a twink person. According to the Encyclopedia of Homosexuality by W.R. Dynes and the Aaron´s Dictionary of Gay Terms, twink is not limited to gay persons, it is just a term to describe someone who falls in a exact description. The image comes from flickr, and given there are no more articles linked to the file, it is fair to assume the only use given to the file was using it for this exact article. Also, the flickr account linked to the article is full with males in clearly gay situations so it is also fair to assume the person in the file in question, is also gay. Finally, a month of block is too much of abuse of power for re adding a picture which, first I thought it was a accidental erasing and second, I believe it should be. There is some way to complain about admin abuse of power? I don´t understant what it say here