Vector space
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/Vector_addition_ans_scaling.png/200px-Vector_addition_ans_scaling.png)
A vector space is a mathematical structure formed by a collection of vectors: objects that may be added together and multiplied ("scaled") by numbers, called scalars in this context. Scalars are often taken to be real numbers, but one may also consider vector spaces with scalar multiplication by complex numbers, rational numbers, or even more general fields instead. The operations of vector addition and scalar multiplication have to satisfy certain requirements, called axioms, listed below. An example of a vector space is that of Euclidean vectors which are often used to represent physical quantities such as forces: any two forces can be added to yield a third, and the multiplication of a force vector by a real factor is another force vector. In the same vein, but in more geometric parlance, vectors representing displacements in the plane or in three-dimensional space also form vector spaces.
Vector spaces are a keystone of linear algebra and are well-understood from this point of view, since vector spaces are characterized by their dimension, which, roughly speaking, specifies the number of independent directions in the space. Further enhancements of the theory are due to the widespread presence of vector spaces in mathematical analysis, mainly in the guise of infinite-dimensional spaces (function spaces) whose vectors are functions. Analytical problems call for the ability to decide if a sequence of vectors converges to a given vector. This is accomplished by considering vector spaces with additional data, mostly spaces endowed with a suitable topology, thus allowing to consider proximity and continuity issues. These topological vector spaces, in particular Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces have a richer theory.
Historically, the first ideas leading to vector spaces can be traced back as far as 17th century's analytic geometry, matrices, systems of linear equations, and Euclidean vectors. The modern, more abstract treatment, first formulated by Giuseppe Peano in the late 19th century, encompasses more general objects than Euclidean space, but much of the theory can be seen as an extension of classical geometric ideas like lines, planes and their higher-dimensional analogs.
Today, vector spaces are applied throughout mathematics, science and engineering. They are the appropriate linear algebraic notion to deal with systems of linear equations, offer a framework for Fourier expansion, which is employed in image compression routines, or provide an environment that can be used for solution techniques of partial differential equations. Furthermore, vector spaces furnish an abstract, coordinate-free way of dealing with geometrical and physical objects such as tensors, which in turn allows the examination of local properties of manifolds by linearization techniques. Vector spaces may also be generalized in several directions, leading to advanced notions in geometry and abstract algebra.
Motivation and definition
Before giving the formal definition of vector spaces, the idea is motivated and illustrated by the example of the vector space of vectors describing physical force, which, for this exposition, is assumed to act in a fixed plane. These vectors are also called Euclidean vectors. The concept of vector spaces relies on the idea of vectors. In the example, a vector describing a force in the plane can be visualized by an arrow in the plane starting at the body's center.[nb 1] In general, the term vector is used for objects on which two operations can be exerted. These operations can be interpreted in several, equivalent ways, either geometrically or algebraically. In view of the algebraic ideas behind these concepts explained below, the two operations are called vector addition and scalar multiplication.
Vector addition means that two vectors v and w can be "added" to yield the sum v + w. The concrete meaning of adding two vectors depends on the nature of the vectors in question. In the example, using the geometric interpretation of force vectors as arrows, the sum of the two vectors is calculated by constructing the parallelogram two of whose sides are the given vectors. The sum of the two is given by the diagonal arrow of the parallelogram, starting at the common point of the two vectors (left-most image below).
Scalar multiplication combines a number—also called scalar—r and a vector v. Again, the concrete meaning of the operation depends on the type of vectors under consideration. In the example, a vector represented by an arrow is multiplied by a scalar by dilating or shrinking the arrow accordingly: if r = 2 (r = 1/4), the resulting vector r · w has the same direction as w, but is stretched to the double length (shrunk to a fourth of the length, respectively) of w (middle image below). Equivalently 2 · w is the sum w + w. In addition, for negative factors, the direction of arrow is swapped: (−1) · v has the opposite direction and the same length as v (blue vector in the middle image).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Another example of vectors is furnished by pairs of real numbers x and y, denoted (x, y). The numbers x and y are called components of the pair. (The order of the two is kept track of, so such a pair is also called ordered pair.) These pairs form vectors, by defining vector addition and scalar multiplication componentwise, i.e.
- (x1, y1) + (x2, y2) = (x1 + x2, y1 + y2)
and
- r · (x, y) = (r · x, r · y).
These two incarnations of vectors correspond to each other in the following sense: an arrow in space (departing at the body center, which is put into the origin of some coordinate system) can be expressed as an ordered pair by considering the x- and y-component of the arrow, as shown in the rightmost image above. Conversely, given a pair (x, y), the arrow going by x to the right (or to the left, if x is negative), and y up (down, if y is negative) turns back an arrow.
Definition
The concept of vector spaces encompasses these two and many more examples. This is done via an abstract algebraic definition that disregards the concrete nature of the particular type of vectors. However, essential properties of vector addition and scalar multiplication present in the examples above are required to hold in any vector space.
As a technical point, to reach utmost generality, the definition of a vector space relies on the notion of a field F. A field is, roughly speaking, a set of numbers possessing addition, subtraction, multiplication and division operations.[nb 2] Many vector spaces encountered in mathematics and sciences use the field of real numbers, but rational or complex numbers and other fields are equally important. The underlying field F is fixed throughout and is specified by speaking of F-vector spaces or vector spaces over F. If F is R or C, the field of real and complex numbers, respectively, the denominations real and complex vector spaces are also common. The elements of F are called scalars.
A vector space is a set V together with two binary operations, operations that combine two entities to yield a third. As above, the two operations are called vector addition and scalar multiplication. The elements of V are called vectors and are denoted in boldface.[nb 3] The sum of two vectors is denoted v + w, the product of a scalar a and a vector v is denoted a · v or av.
To qualify as a vector space, addition and multiplication have to adhere to a number of requirements called axioms generalizing the properties of the vectors introduced above.[1] In the formulation of the axioms below, let u, v, w be arbitrary vectors in V, and a, b be scalars in F.
Axiom | Signification |
Associativity of addition | u + (v + w) = (u + v) + w. |
Commutativity of addition | v + w = w + v. |
Identity element of addition | There exists an element 0 ∈ V, called the zero vector, such that v + 0 = v for all v ∈ V. |
Inverse elements of addition | For all v ∈ V, there exists an element w ∈ V, called the additive inverse of v, such that v + w = 0. The additive inverse is denoted −v. |
Distributivity of scalar multiplication with respect to vector addition | a(v + w) = av + aw. |
Distributivity of scalar multiplication with respect to field addition | (a + b)v = av + bv. |
Compatibility of scalar multiplication with field multiplication | a(bv) = (ab)v [nb 4] |
Identity element of scalar multiplication | 1v = v, where 1 denotes the multiplicative identity in F. |
These axioms entail that subtraction of two vectors and division by a (non-zero) scalar can be performed via
- v − w = v + (−w),
- v / a = (1 / a) · v.
The example spaces introduced above are indeed real vector spaces. For example, in the algebraic example of vectors above, commutativity of addition amounts to the statement
- (xv, yv) + (xw, yw) = (xw, yw) + (xv, yv),
where v = (xv, yv) and likewise for w. In the geometric parlance of vectors using arrows, the identity is satisfied since the parallelogram defining the sum of the vectors is independent of the order of the vectors.
In contrast to the intuition stemming from vectors in the plane and higher-dimensional cases, there is, in general vector spaces, no notion of nearness, angles or distances. To deal with such matters, particular types of vector spaces are introduced; see below.
Alternative formulations and elementary consequences
The requirement that vector addition and scalar multiplication be binary operations includes (by definition of binary operations) a property called closure: that u + v and av are in V for all a in F, and u, v in V. Some older sources mention these properties as separate axioms.[2]
The first four axioms can be subsumed by requiring the set of vectors to be an abelian group under addition, and the remaining axioms are equivalent to there being a ring homomorphism ƒ from the field F into the endomorphism ring of the group of vectors. Then scalar multiplication av is defined as (ƒ(a))(v).
There are a number of direct consequences of the vector space axioms. Some of them derive from elementary group theory, applied to the additive group of vectors: for example the zero vector 0 of V and the additive inverse −v of any vector v are unique. Other properties follow from the distributive law, for example scalar multiplication by zero yields the zero vector and no other scalar multiplication yields the zero vector.
History
Vector spaces stem from affine geometry, via the introduction of coordinates in the plane or three-dimensional space. Around 1636, French mathematicians René Descartes and Pierre de Fermat founded analytic geometry by identifying solutions to an equation of two variables with points on a plane curve.[3] To achieve geometric solutions without using coordinates, Bolzano introduced, in 1804, certain operations on points, lines and planes, which are predecessors of vectors.[4] This work was made use of in the conception of barycentric coordinates by Möbius in 1827.[5] The foundation of the definition of vectors was Bellavitis' notion of the bipoint, an oriented segment one of whose ends is the origin and the other one a target. Vectors were reconsidered with the presentation of complex numbers by Argand and Hamilton and the inception of quaternions by the latter.[6] They are elements in R2 and R4; treating them using linear combinations goes back to Laguerre in 1867, who also defined systems of linear equations.
In 1857, Cayley introduced the matrix notation which allows for a harmonization and simplification of linear maps. Around the same time, Grassmann studied the barycentric calculus initiated by Möbius. He envisaged sets of abstract objects endowed with operations.[7] In his work, the concepts of linear independence and dimension, as well as scalar products are present. Actually Grassmann's 1844 work exceeds the framework of vector spaces, since his considering multiplication, too, led him to what are today called algebras. Italian mathematician Peano was the first to give the modern definition of vector spaces and linear maps in 1888.[8]
An important development of vector spaces is due to the construction of function spaces by Henri Lebesgue. This was later formalized by Banach and Hilbert, around 1920.[9] At that time, algebra and the new field of functional analysis began to interact, notably with key concepts such as spaces of p-integrable functions and Hilbert spaces.[10] Also at this time, the first studies concerning infinite-dimensional vector spaces were done.
Examples
Coordinate and function spaces
The first example of a vector space over a field F is the field itself, equipped with its standard addition and multiplication. This is the case n = 1 of a vector space usually denoted Fn, known as the coordinate space whose elements are n-tuples:
- (a1, a2, ..., an), where the ai are elements of F.[11]
Infinite coordinate sequences, and more generally functions from any fixed set Ω to a field F also form vector spaces, by performing addition and scalar multiplication pointwise. That is, the sum of two functions ƒ and g is given by
- (ƒ + g)(w) = ƒ(w) + g(w)
and similarly for multiplication. Such function spaces occur in many geometric situations, when Ω is the real line or an interval, or other subsets of Rn. Many notions in topology and analysis, such as continuity, integrability or differentiability are well-behaved with respect to linearity: sums and scalar multiples of functions possessing such a property still have that property.[12] Therefore, the set of such functions are vector spaces. They are studied in greater detail using the methods of functional analysis, see below. Algebraic constraints also yield vector spaces: the vector space F[x] is given by polynomial functions:
- ƒ(x) = r0 + r1x + ... + rn−1xn−1 + rnxn, where the coefficients r0, ..., rn are in F.[13]
Linear equations
Systems of homogeneous linear equations are closely tied to vector spaces.[14] For example, the solutions of
a + 3b + c = 0 4a + 2b + 2c = 0
are given by triples with arbitrary a, b = a/2, and c = −5a/2. They form a vector space: sums and scalar multiples of such triples still satisfy the same ratios of the three variables; thus they are solutions, too. Matrices can be used to condense multiple linear equations as above into one vector equation, namely
- Ax = 0,
where A = is the matrix containing the coefficients of the given equations, x is the vector (a, b, c), Ax denotes the matrix product and 0 = (0, 0) is the zero vector. In a similar vein, the solutions of homogeneous linear differential equations form vector spaces. For example
- ƒ''(x) + 2ƒ'(x) + ƒ(x) = 0
yields ƒ(x) = a e−x + bx e−x, where a and b are arbitrary constants, and ex is the natural exponential function.
Field extensions
A common situation in algebra, and especially in algebraic number theory is a field F containing a smaller field E. By the given multiplication and addition operations of F, F becomes an E-vector space, also called a field extension of E.[15] For example the complex numbers are a vector space over R. A particularly interesting type of field extension in number theory is Q(α), the extension of the rational numbers Q by a fixed complex number α. Q(α) is the smallest field containing the rationals and a fixed complex number α. Its dimension as a vector space over Q depends on the choice of α.
Bases and dimension
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/Vector_components_and_base_change.svg/200px-Vector_components_and_base_change.svg.png)
Bases reveal the structure of vector spaces in a concise way. A basis is defined as a (finite or infinite) set B = {vi}i ∈ I of vectors vi indexed by some index set I that spans the whole space, and is minimal with this property. The former means that any vector v can be expressed as a finite sum (called linear combination of the basis elements)
- v = a1vi1 + a2vi2 + ... + anvin,
where the ak are scalars and vik (k = 1, ..., n) elements of the basis B. Minimality, on the other hand, is made formal by requiring B to be linearly independent. A set of vectors is said to be linearly independent if none of its elements can be expressed as a linear combination of the remaining ones. Equivalently, an equation
- a1vi1 + a2vi2 + ... + anvin = 0
can only hold if and only if all scalars a1, ..., an equal zero. Linear independence ensures that the representation of any vector in terms of basis vectors, the existence of which is guaranteed by the requirement that the basis span V, is unique.[16] This is referred to as the coordinatized viewpoint of vector spaces, by viewing basis vectors as generalizations of coordinate vectors x, y, z in R3 and similarly in higher-dimensional cases.
A basis of Fn, called the standard basis, is given by the coordinate vectors e1 = (1, 0, ..., 0), e2 = (0, 1, 0, ..., 0), to en = (0, 0, ..., 0, 1), since any vector (x1, x2, ..., xn) can be uniquely expressed as a linear combination of these vectors:
- (x1, x2, ..., xn) = x1(1, 0, ..., 0) + x2(0, 1, 0, ..., 0) + ... + xn(0, ..., 0, 1) = x1e1 + x2e2 + ... + xnen.
Every vector space has a basis. This fact relies on Zorn’s Lemma, an equivalent formulation of the axiom of choice.[17] Given the other axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, the existence of bases is equivalent to the axiom of choice.[18] The ultrafilter lemma, which is weaker than the axiom of choice, implies that all bases of a given vector space have the same number of elements, or cardinality.[19] It is called the dimension of the vector space, denoted dim V. If the space is spanned by finitely many vectors, the above statements can be proven without such fundamental input from set theory.[20]
The dimension of the coordinate space Fn is n, by the basis exhibited above. The dimension of function spaces, such as the space of functions on some (bounded or unbounded) interval, is infinite.[nb 5] Under suitable regularity assumptions on the coefficients involved, the dimension of the solution space of an homogeneous ordinary differential equation equals the degree of the equation.[21] For example, the above equation has degree 2. The solution space is generated by e−x and xe−x. These two functions are linearly independent over R, so the dimension of this space is two.
The dimension (or degree) of the field extension Q(α) over Q depends on whether or not α is algebraic, in the sense that it satisfies some polynomial equation
- qnαn + qn−1αn−1 + ... + q0 = 0, with rational coefficients qn, ..., q0.
If it is algebraic the dimension is finite. More precisely, it equals the degree of the minimal polynomial having α as a root.[22] For example, the complex numbers C are a two-dimensional real vector space, generated by 1 and the imaginary unit i. The latter satisfies i2 + 1 = 0, an equation of degree two. Thus, C is a two-dimensional R-vector space (and, as any field, one-dimensional as a vector space over itself, C). If α is not algebraic, the dimension of Q(α) over Q is infinite. For instance, for α = π there is no such equation, since π is transcendental.[23]
Linear maps and matrices
As with many algebraic entities, the relation of two vector spaces is expressed by maps between them. In the context of vector spaces, the corresponding concept is called linear map or linear transformation.[24] They are functions ƒ : V → W that are compatible with the vector space structure—i.e., they preserve sums and scalar multiplication:
- ƒ(x + y) = ƒ(x) + ƒ(y) and ƒ(a · x) = a · ƒ(y) for all x and y in V, all a in F.
An isomorphism is a linear map ƒ : V → W such that there exists an inverse map g : W → V, which is a map such that the two possible compositions ƒ ∘ g : W → W and g ∘ ƒ : V → V are identity maps. Equivalently, ƒ is both one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective).[25] If there exists an isomorphism between V and W, the two spaces are said to be isomorphic; they are then essentially identical as vector spaces, since all identities holding in V are, via ƒ, transported to similar ones in W, and vice versa via g.
Linear maps V → W between two fixed vector spaces form a vector space HomF(V, W), also denoted L(V, W).[26] The space of linear maps from V to F is called the dual vector space, denoted V∗.[27] Via the injective natural map V → V∗∗, any vector space can be embedded into its bidual; the map is an isomorphism if and only if the space is finite-dimensional.[28]
Once a basis of V is chosen, linear maps ƒ : V → W are completely determined by specifying the images of the basis vectors, because any element of V is expressed uniquely as a linear combination of them.[29] If dim V = dim W, a 1-to-1 correspondence between fixed bases of V and W gives rise to a linear map that maps any basis element of V to the corresponding basis element of W. It is an isomorphism, by its very definition.[30] Therefore, two vector spaces are isomorphic if their dimensions agree and vice versa. Another way to express this is that any vector space is completely classified (up to isomorphism) by its dimension, a single number. In particular, any n-dimensional F-vector space V is isomorphic to Fn. There is however, no "canonical" or preferred isomorphism; actually an isomorphism φ: Fn → V is equivalent to the choice of a basis of V, by mapping the standard basis of Fn to V, via φ. Appending an automorphism, i.e. an isomorphism ψ: V → V yields another isomorphism ψ∘φ: Fn → V, the composition of ψ and φ, and therefore a different basis of V. The freedom of choosing a convenient basis is particularly useful in the infinite-dimensional context, see below.
Matrices
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Matrix.svg/200px-Matrix.svg.png)
Matrices are a useful notion to encode linear maps.[31] They are written as a rectangular array of scalars as in the image at the right. Any m-by-n matrix A gives rise to a linear map from Fn to Fm, by the following
- , where denotes summation,
or, using the matrix multiplication of the matrix A with the coordinate vector x:
- x ↦ Ax.
Moreover, after choosing bases of V and W, any linear map ƒ : V → W is uniquely represented by a matrix via this assignment.[32]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b9/Determinant_parallelepiped.svg/200px-Determinant_parallelepiped.svg.png)
The determinant det (A) of a square matrix A is a scalar that tells whether the associated map is an isomorphism or not: to be so it is sufficient and necessary that the determinant is nonzero.[33] The determinant of a real square matrix also determines whether the corresponding linear transformation is orientation preserving or not: it is so if and only if the determinant is positive.
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
Endomorphisms, linear maps ƒ : V → V, are particularly important since in this case vectors v can be compared with their image under ƒ, ƒ(v). Any nonzero vector v satisfying λv = ƒ(v), where λ is a scalar, is called an eigenvector of ƒ with eigenvalue λ.[nb 6][34] Equivalently, v is an element of kernel of the difference ƒ − λ · Id (where Id is the identity map V → V). In the finite-dimensional case, this can be rephrased using determinants: ƒ having eigenvalue λ is equivalent to
- det (ƒ − λ · Id) = 0.
By spelling out the definition of the determinant, the expression on the left hand side can be seen to be a polynomial function in λ, called the characteristic polynomial of ƒ.[35] If the field F is large enough to contain a zero of this polynomial (which automatically happens for F algebraically closed, such as F = C) any linear map has at least one eigenvector. The vector space V may or may not possess an eigenbasis, a basis consisting of eigenvectors. This phenomenon is governed by the Jordan canonical form of the map.[nb 7] The spectral theorem describes the infinite-dimensional case; to accomplish this aim, the machinery of functional analysis is needed, see below. The set of all eigenvectors corresponding to a particular eigenvalue of ƒ forms a vector space known as the eigenspace corresponding to the eigenvalue (and ƒ) in question.
Basic constructions
In addition to the above concrete examples, there are a number of standard linear algebraic constructions that yield vector spaces related to given ones. In addition to the definitions given below, they are also characterized by universal properties, which determine an object X by specifying the linear maps from X to any other vector space.
Subspaces and quotient spaces
A nonempty subset W of a vector space V that is closed under addition and scalar multiplication is called a subspace of V.[36] Subspaces of V are vector spaces (over the same field) in their own right. The intersection of all subspaces containing a given set S of vectors is called its span, and is the smallest subspace of V containing the set S. Expressed in terms of elements, the span is the subspace consisting linear combinations of elements of S.[37]
The counterpart to subspaces are quotient vector spaces.[38] Given any subspace W ⊂ V, the quotient space V/W ("V modulo W") is defined as follows: as a set, it consists of v + W = {v + w, w ∈ W}, where v is an arbitrary vector in V. The sum of two such elements v1 + W and v2 + W is (v1 + v2) + W, and scalar multiplication is given by a · (v + W) = (a · v) + W. The key point in this definition is that v1 + W = v2 + W if and only if the difference of v1 and v2 lies in W.[nb 8] This way, the quotient space "forgets" information that is contained in the subspace W.
The kernel ker(ƒ) of a linear map ƒ: V → W consists of vectors v that are mapped to 0 in W.[39] Both kernel and image im(ƒ) = {ƒ(v), v ∈ V} are subspaces of V and W, respectively.[40] The existence of kernels and images is part of the statement that the category of vector spaces (over a fixed field F) is an abelian category, i.e. a corpus of mathematical objects and structure-preserving maps between them (a category) that behaves much like the category of abelian groups.[41] Because of this, many statements such as the first isomorphism theorem (also called rank-nullity theorem in matrix-related terms)
- V / ker(ƒ) ≅ im(ƒ).
and the second and third isomorphism theorem can be formulated and proven in a way very similar to the corresponding statements for groups.
An important example is the kernel of a linear map x ↦ Ax for some fixed matrix A, as above. The kernel of this map is the subspace of vectors x such that Ax = 0, which is precisely the set of solutions to the system of homogeneous linear equations belonging to A. This concept also extends to linear differential equations
- , where the coefficients ai are functions in x, too.
In the corresponding map
- ,
the derivatives of the function ƒ appear linearly (as opposed to ƒ''(x)2, for example). Since differentiation is a linear procedure (i.e., (ƒ + g)' = ƒ' + g ' and (c·ƒ)' = c·ƒ' for a constant c) this assignment is linear, called a linear differential operator. In particular, the solutions to the differential equation D(ƒ) = 0 form a vector space (over R or C).
Direct product and direct sum
The direct product of a family of vector spaces Vi, where i runs through some index set I, consists of the set of all tuples (vi)i ∈ I, which specify for each index i an element vi of Vi.[42] Addition and scalar multiplication is performed componentwise. A variant of this construction is the direct sum (also called coproduct and denoted ), where only tuples with finitely many nonzero vectors are allowed. If the index set I is finite, the two constructions agree, but differ otherwise.
Tensor product
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ce/Universal_property_tensor_product.png/200px-Universal_property_tensor_product.png)
The tensor product V ⊗F W, or simply V ⊗ W, of two vector spaces V and W is one of the central notions of multilinear algebra which deals with extending notions such as linear maps to several variables. A map g: V × W → X is called bilinear if g is linear in both variables v and w. That is to say, for fixed w the map v ↦ g(v, w) is linear in the sense above and likewise for fixed v.
The tensor product is a particular vector space that is a universal recipient of bilinear maps g, as follows. It is defined as the vector space consisting of finite (formal) sums of symbols called tensors
- v1 ⊗ w1 + v2 ⊗ w2 + ... + vn ⊗ wn,
subject to the rules
- a · (v ⊗ w) = (a · v) ⊗ w = v ⊗ (a · w), where a is a scalar,
- (v1 + v2) ⊗ w = v1 ⊗ w + v2 ⊗ w, and
- v ⊗ (w1 + w2) = v ⊗ w1 + v ⊗ w2.[43]
These rules ensure that the map ƒ from the V × W to V ⊗ W that maps a tuple (v, w) to v ⊗ w is bilinear. The universality states that given any vector space X and any bilinear map g: V × W → X, there exists a unique map u, shown in the diagram with a dotted arrow, whose composition with ƒ equals g: u(v ⊗ w) = g(v, w).[44] This is called the universal property of the tensor product, an instance of the method to indirectly define objects by specifying maps from or to this object, a technique much used in advanced abstract algebra.
Vector spaces with additional structure
From the point of view of linear algebra, vector spaces are completely understood insofar as any vector space is characterized, up to isomorphism, by its dimension. However, vector spaces ad hoc do not offer a framework to deal with the question—crucial to analysis—whether a sequence of functions converges to another function. Likewise, linear algebra is not per se adapted to deal with infinite series, since the addition operation allows only finitely many terms to be added. The needs of functional analysis require considering additional structures. Much the same way the axiomatic treatment of vector spaces reveals their essential algebraic features, studying vector spaces with additional data abstractly turns out to be advantageous, too.
A first example of an additional datum is an order ≤, a token by which vectors can be compared.[45] For example, n-dimensional real space Rn can be ordered by comparing the vectors componentwise. Ordered vector spaces, for example Riesz spaces, are fundamental to Lebesgue integration, which relies on the ability to express a function as a difference of two positive functions
- ƒ = ƒ+ − ƒ−,
where ƒ+ denotes the positive part of ƒ and ƒ− the negative part.[46]
Normed vector spaces and inner product spaces
"Measuring" vectors is a frequent need, either by specifying a norm, a datum which measures lengths of vectors, or by an inner product, which measures angles between vectors. Norms and inner products are denoted and , respectively. The datum of an inner product entails that lengths of vectors can be defined too, by defining the associated norm . Vector spaces endowed with such data are known as normed vector spaces and inner product spaces, respectively.[47]
Coordinate space Fn can be equipped with the standard dot product:
In R2, this reflects the common notion of the angle between two vectors x and y, by the law of cosines:
Because of this, two vectors satisfying are called orthogonal. An important variant of the standard dot product is used in Minkowski space: R4 endowed with the Lorentz product
In contrast to the standard dot product, it is not positive definite: also takes negative values, for example for x = (0, 0, 0, 1). Singling out the fourth coordinate—corresponding to time, as opposed to three space-dimensions—makes it useful for the mathematical treatment of special relativity.
Topological vector spaces
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Vector_norms2.svg/250px-Vector_norms2.svg.png)
Convergence questions are addressed by considering vector spaces V carrying a compatible topology, a structure that allows one to talk about elements being close to each other.[49][50] Compatible here means that addition and scalar multiplication should be continuous maps. Roughly, if x and y in V, and a in F vary by a bounded amount, then so do x + y and ax.[nb 9] To make sense of specifying the amount a scalar changes, the field F also has to carry a topology in this context; a common choice are the reals or the complex numbers.
In such topological vector spaces one can consider series of vectors. The infinite sum
denotes the limit of the corresponding finite partial sums of the sequence (ƒi)i∈N of elements of V. For example, the ƒi could be (real or complex) functions belonging to some function space V, and the series is then a function series. The mode of convergence of the series depends on the topology imposed on the function space. In such cases, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence are two prominent examples.
A way to ensure the existence of limits of certain infinite series is to restrict attention to spaces where any Cauchy sequence has a limit; such a vector space is called complete. Roughly, a vector space is complete provided that it contains all necessary limits. For example, the vector space of polynomials on the unit interval [0,1], equipped with the topology of uniform convergence is not complete because any continuous function on [0,1] can be uniformly approximated by a sequence of polynomials, by the Weierstrass approximation theorem.[51] In contrast, the space of all continuous functions on [0,1] with the topology of uniform convergence is complete.[52] Banach and Hilbert spaces are complete topological spaces whose topologies are given, respectively, by a norm and an inner product. Their study—a key piece of functional analysis—focusses on infinite-dimensional vector spaces, since all norms on finite-dimensional topological vector spaces are equivalent, giving rise to the same notion of convergence.[53] The image at the right shows the equivalence of the 1-norm and ∞-norm on R2: as the unit "balls" enclose each other, a sequence converges to zero in one norm if and only if it so does in the other norm. In the infinite-dimensional case, however, there will generally be inequivalent topologies, which makes the study of topological vector spaces richer than that of vector spaces without additional data.
From a conceptual point of view, all notions related to topological vector spaces should match the topology. For example, instead of considering all linear maps (also called functionals) V → W, it is useful to require maps to be continuous.[54] For example, the dual space V∗ consists of continuous functionals V → R (or C). The fundamental Hahn-Banach theorem is concerned with separating subspaces of appropriate topological vector spaces by continuous functionals.[55]
Banach spaces
Banach spaces, introduced by Stefan Banach, are complete normed vector spaces.[56] A first example is the vector space ℓ p consisting of infinite vectors with real entries x = (x1, x2, ...) whose p-norm (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞) given by
- for p < ∞ and
is finite. The topologies on the infinite-dimensional space ℓ p are inequivalent for different p. E.g. the sequence of vectors xn = (2−n, 2−n, ..., 2−n, 0, 0, ...), i.e. the first 2n components are 2−n, the following ones are 0, converges to the zero vector for p = ∞, but does not for p = 1:
- , but .
More generally than sequences of real numbers, functions ƒ: Ω → R are endowed with a norm that replaces the above sum by the Lebesgue integral
- .
The space of integrable functions on a given domain Ω (for example an interval) satisfying |ƒ|p < ∞, and equipped with this norm are called Lebesgue spaces, denoted Lp(Ω).[nb 10] These spaces are complete.[57] (If one uses the Riemann integral instead, the space is not complete, which may be seen as a justification for Lebesgue's integration theory.[nb 11]) Concretely this means that for any sequence of Lebesgue-integrable functions ƒ1, ƒ2, ... with |ƒn|p < ∞, satisfying the condition
there exists a function ƒ(x) belonging to the vector space Lp(Ω) such that
Imposing boundedness conditions not only on the function, but also on its derivatives leads to Sobolev spaces.[58]
Hilbert spaces
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e8/Periodic_identity_function.gif/400px-Periodic_identity_function.gif)
Complete inner product spaces are known as Hilbert spaces, in honor of David Hilbert.[59] A key case is the Hilbert space L2(Ω), with inner product given by
- , where denotes the complex conjugate of g(x).[60][nb 12]
By definition, Cauchy sequences in any Hilbert space converge to a limit. Conversely, finding a sequence of functions ƒn with desirable properties that approximates a given limit function, is equally crucial. Early analysis, in the guise of the Taylor approximation, established an approximation of differentiable functions ƒ by polynomials.[61] By the Stone–Weierstrass theorem, every continuous function on [a, b] can be approximated as closely as desired by a polynomial.[62] A similar approximation technique by trigonometric functions is commonly called Fourier expansion, and is much applied in engineering, see below. More generally, and more conceptually, the theorem yields a simple description of what "basic functions", or, in abstract Hilbert spaces, what basic vectors suffice to generate a Hilbert space H, in the sense that the closure of their span (i.e., finite linear combinations and limits of those) is the whole space. Such a set of functions is called a basis of H, its cardinality is known as the Hilbert dimension.[nb 13] Not only does the theorem exhibit suitable basis functions as sufficient for approximation purposes, together with the Gram-Schmidt process, it also allows to construct a basis of orthogonal vectors.[63] Such orthogonal bases are the Hilbert space generalization of the coordinate axes in finite-dimensional Euclidean space.
The solutions to various important differential equations can be interpreted in terms of Hilbert spaces. For example, a great many fields in physics and engineering lead to such equations and frequently solutions with particular physical properties are used as basis functions, often orthogonal, that serve as the axes in a corresponding Hilbert space.[64] As an example from physics, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics describes the change of physical properties in time, by means of a partial differential equation determining a wavefunction.[65] Definite values for physical properties such as energy, or momentum, correspond to eigenvalues of a certain (linear) differential operator and the associated wavefunctions are called eigenstates. The spectral theorem decomposes a linear compact operator that acts upon functions in terms of these eigenfunctions and their eigenvalues.[66]
Algebras over fields
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/29/Rectangular_hyperbola.svg/250px-Rectangular_hyperbola.svg.png)
In general, vector spaces do not possess a multiplication operation. A vector space equipped with an additional bilinear operator defining the multiplication of two vectors is an algebra over a field.[67] Many algebras stem from functions on some geometrical object: since functions with values in a field can be multiplied, these entities form algebras. The Stone–Weierstrass theorem mentioned above, for example, relies on Banach algebras which are both Banach spaces and algebras.
Commutative algebra makes great use of rings of polynomials in one or several variables, introduced above, whose multiplication is both commutative and associative. These rings and their quotients form the basis of algebraic geometry, because they are rings of functions of algebraic geometric objects.[68]
Another crucial example are Lie algebras, which are neither commutative, nor associative, but the failure to be so is limited by the constraints ([x, y] denotes the product of x and y):
- anticommutativity: [x, y] = −[y, x], and
- the Jacobi identity: [x, [y, z]] + [y, [x, z]] + [z, [x, y]] = 0.[69]
Examples include the vector space of n-by-n matrices, with [x, y] = xy − yx, the commutator of two matrices, and R3, endowed with the cross product.
The tensor algebra T(V) is a formal way of adding products to any vector space V to obtain an algebra.[70] As a vector space, it is spanned by symbols, called simple tensors
- v1 ⊗ v2 ⊗ ... ⊗ vn, where the degree n varies.
The multiplication is given by concatenating such symbols, imposing the distributive law under addition, and requiring that scalar multiplication commute with the tensor product ⊗, much the same way as with the tensor product of two vector spaces introduced above. In general, there are no relations between v1 ⊗ v2 and v2 ⊗ v1. Forcing two such elements to be equal leads to the symmetric algebra, whereas forcing v1 ⊗ v2 = − v2 ⊗ v1 yields the exterior algebra.[71]
Applications
Vector spaces have manifold applications as they occur in many circumstances, namely wherever functions with values in some field are involved. They provide a framework to deal with analytical and geometrical problems, or are used in the Fourier transform. This list is not exhaustive: many more applications exist, for example in optimization. The minimax theorem of game theory stating the existence of a unique payoff when all players play optimally can also be formulated and proven using vector spaces methods.[72] Representation theory fruitfully transfers the good understanding of linear algebra and vector spaces to other mathematical domains, such as group theory.[73]
Distributions
A distribution (or generalized function) is a linear map assigning a number to each "test" function, typically a smooth function with compact support, in a continuous way: in the above terminology the space of distributions is the (continuous) dual of the test function space.[74] The latter space is endowed with a topology that takes into account not only ƒ itself, but also all its higher derivatives. A standard example is the result of integrating a test function ƒ over some domain Ω:
Another example is the Dirac distribution, denoted by δ, which associates to a test function ƒ its value at the origin: δ(ƒ) = ƒ(0). Distributions are a powerful instrument to solve differential equations. Since all standard analytic notions such as derivatives are linear, they extend naturally to the space of distributions. Therefore the equation in question can be transferred to a distribution space, which is strictly bigger than the underlying function space, so that more flexible methods are available for solving the equation. For example, Green's functions and fundamental solutions are usually distributions rather than proper functions, and can then be used to find solutions of the equation with prescribed boundary conditions. The found solution can then in some cases be proven to be actually a true function, and a solution to the original equation (e.g., using the Lax-Milgram theorem, a consequence of the Riesz representation theorem).[75]
Fourier analysis
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Heat_eqn.gif)
Resolving a periodic function into a sum of trigonometric functions forms a Fourier series, a technique much used in physics and engineering.[nb 14][76] The underlying vector space is usually the Hilbert space L2(0, 2π), for which the functions sin mx and cos mx (m an integer) form an orthogonal basis.[77] The Fourier expansion of an L2 function f is written as
The coefficients am and bm are called Fourier coefficients of ƒ, and are calculated by the formulas[78]
- ,
In physical terms the function is represented as a superposition of sine waves and the coefficients give information about the function's frequency spectrum.[79] A complex-number form of Fourier series is also commonly used, where the basis functions are eimx.[80] The concrete formulae above are consequences of a more abstract, and more general mathematical duality called Pontryagin duality.[81] Applied to the group R, it yields the classical Fourier transform; an application in physics are reciprocal lattices, where the underlying group is a finite-dimensional real vector space endowed with the additional datum of a lattice encoding positions of atoms in crystals.[82]
Fourier series are used to solve boundary value problems in partial differential equations.[83] In 1822, Fourier first used this technique to solve the heat equation on a special domain.[84]
A discrete version of the Fourier series can be used in sampling applications where the function value is known only at a finite number of equally spaced points. In this case the Fourier series is finite and its value is equal to the sampled values at all points.[85] The set of coefficients is known as the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of the given sample sequence and describe the frequency components of the signal. The DFT is one of the key tools of digital signal processing, a field whose applications include radar, speech encoding, image compression, and many more.[86] The JPEG image format is an application of the closely-related discrete cosine transform.[87]
The fast Fourier transform is an algorithm for rapidly computing the discrete Fourier transform.[88] It is used not only for calculating the Fourier coefficients but, using the convolution theorem, also for computing the convolution of two finite sequences.[89] They in turn are applied in digital filters[90] and as a rapid multiplication algorithm for polynomials and large integers (Schönhage-Strassen algorithm).[91][92]
Differential geometry
The tangent plane to a surface at a point is naturally a vector space whose origin is identified with the point of contact. Even in a three-dimensional Euclidean space, it is impossible to prescribe a basis of the tangent plane in a natural way, and so it is most easily conceived of as an abstract vector space rather than a real coordinate space. The tangent plane is the best linear approximation, or linearization, of a surface at a point.[nb 15]
As the notion of a surface is generalized to higher dimensions as a differentiable manifold, so the tangent plane generalizes to the tangent space, which is the linearization of a differentiable manifold at a point.[93]
The dual of the tangent space is called cotangent space. Differential forms are elements of the exterior algebra of the cotangent space. They generalize the "dx" in standard integration
Further vector space constructions, in particular tensors are widely used in geometry and beyond. Riemannian manifolds are manifolds whose tangent spaces are endowed with a suitable inner product.[94] Derived therefrom, the Riemann curvature tensor encodes all curvatures of a manifold in one object, which finds applications in general relativity, for example, where the Einstein curvature tensor describes the curvature of space-time.[95][96] The tangent space of a Lie group can be given naturally the structure of a Lie algebra and can be used to classify compact Lie groups.[97]
The cotangent space is also used in commutative algebra and algebraic geometry to define regular local rings, an algebraic adaptation of smoothness in differential geometry, by comparing the dimension of the cotangent space of the ring (defined in a purely algebraic manner) to the Krull dimension of the ring.[98]
Generalizations
Vector bundles
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Moebiusstrip.png/249px-Moebiusstrip.png)
A vector bundle is a family of vector spaces parametrised continuously by some topological space X.[99] More precisely, a vector bundle E over X is given by a continuous map
- π : E → X,
which is locally a product of X with some (fixed) vector space V: for every point x in X, there is a neighborhood U of x such that the restriction of π to π−1(U) equals the projection V × U → U (a "trivialization" of the bundle over U).[nb 16] The case dim V = 1 is called a line bundle. Despite their locally trivial character, depending on the shape of the underlying space X, line bundles and higher dimensional vector bundles as well may be "twisted" in the large, i.e., the bundle need not be the "trivial" bundle V × X. For example, the Möbius strip can be seen as a line bundle over the circle S1 (if one extends the bounded interval to infinity). It is, however, different from the cylinder S1 × R, because the latter is orientable whereas the former is not.[100] Another important example is the tangent bundle, it consists of the collection of tangent spaces parametrised by the points of a differentiable manifold.
The (non-)existence of vector bundles with certain properties can tell something about the underlying topological space. For instance, the tangent bundle of the circle S1 is globally isomorphic to S1 × R, since there is a global nonzero vector field on S1.[nb 17] In contrast, by the hairy ball theorem, there is no tangent vector field on the 2-sphere S2 which is everywhere nonzero.[101] K-theory studies the isomorphism classes of all vector bundles over some topological space.[102] In addition to deepening topological and geometrical insight, it also has purely algebraic conclusions, such as the classification of finite-dimensional real division algebras: R, C, the quaternions H and the octonions.
Modules
Modules are to rings what vector spaces are to fields. The very same axioms, applied to a ring R instead of a field F yield modules.[103] In contrast to the exhaustive understanding of vector spaces offered by linear algebra, the theory of modules is much more complicated, because of ring elements that do not possess multiplicative inverses. For example, modules need not have bases as the Z-module (i.e. abelian group) Z/2 shows; those modules that do (including all vector spaces) are known as free modules. The algebro-geometric interpretation of commutative rings via their spectrum allows to develop concepts such as locally free modules, which are the algebraic counterpart to vector bundles. In the guise of projective modules they are important in homological algebra and algebraic K-theory.[104][105]
Affine and projective spaces
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8c/Affine_subspace.svg/200px-Affine_subspace.svg.png)
Roughly, affine spaces are vector spaces whose origin is not specified.[106] More precisely, an affine space is a set with a transitive vector space action. In particular, a vector space is an affine space over itself, by the map
- V2 → V, (a, b) ↦ a − b.
If W is a linear space, then an affine subspace is a subset of W obtained by translating a linear subspace V by a fixed vector x; this space is denoted by x + V and consists of all vectors of the form x + v for v ∈ V. An important example is the space of solutions of a system of nonhomogeneous linear equations
- Ax = b
generalizing the homogeneous case b = 0 above.[107] The space of solutions is the affine subspace x + V where x is a particular solution of the equation, and V is the space of solutions of the homogeneous equation (the nullspace of A).
The set of one-dimensional subspaces of a fixed finite-dimensional vector space V is known as projective space, an important geometric object formalizing the idea of parallel lines intersecting at infinity.[108] More generally, the Grassmannian manifold consists of linear subspaces of higher (fixed) dimension n. Finally, flag manifolds parametrize flags, which are chains of subspaces (with fixed dimension)
- 0 = V0 ⊂ V1 ⊂ ... ⊂ Vn = V.
See also
|
|
Notes
- ^ The body will be idealised insofar that length, width, etc. of the body are disregarded.
- ^ Some authors (such as Brown 1991) restrict attention to the fields R or C, but most of the theory is unchanged over an arbitrary field.
- ^ It is also common, especially in physics, to denote vectors with an arrow on top: .
- ^ This axiom is not asserting the associativity of an operation, since there are two operations in question, scalar multiplication: bv; and field multiplication: ab.
- ^ The indicator functions of intervals (of which there are infinitely many) are linearly independent, for example.
- ^ The nomenclature derives from German "eigen", which means own or proper.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 8, p. 140. See also Jordan–Chevalley decomposition.
- ^ Some authors (such as Roman 2005) choose to start with this equivalence relation and derive the concrete shape of V/W from this.
- ^ This requirement implies that the topology gives rise to a uniform structure, Bourbaki 1989, ch. II.
- ^ The triangle inequality for |−|p is provided by the Minkowski inequality. For technical reasons, in the context of functions one has to identify functions that agree almost everywhere to get a norm, and not only a seminorm.
- ^ "Many functions in L2 of Lebesgue measure, being unbounded, cannot be integrated with the classical Riemann integral. So spaces of Riemann integrable functions would not be complete in the L2 norm, and the orthogonal decomposition would not apply to them. This shows one of the advantages of Lebesgue integration.", Dudley 1989, sect. 5.3, p. 125.
- ^ For p ≠2, Lp(Ω) is not a Hilbert space.
- ^ A basis of a Hilbert space is not the same thing as a basis in the sense of linear algebra above. For distinction, the latter is then called a Hamel basis.
- ^ Although the Fourier series is periodic, the technique can be applied to any L2 function on an interval by considering the function to be continued periodically outside the interval. See Kreyszig 1988, p. 601
- ^ That is to say (BSE-3 2001) , the plane passing through the point of contact P such that the distance from a point P1 on the surface to the plane is infinitesimally small compared to the distance from P1 to P in the limit as P1 approaches P along the surface.
- ^ Additionally, the transition maps between two such trivializations are required to be linear maps on V.
- ^ A line bundle, such as the tangent bundle of S1 is trivial if and only if there is a section that vanishes nowhere, see Husemoller 1994, Corollary 8.3. The sections of the tangent bundle are just vector fields.
Footnotes
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 1, p. 27.
- ^ van der Waerden 1993, Ch. 19.
- ^ Bourbaki 1969, ch. "Algèbre linéaire et algèbre multilinéaire", pp. 78–91.
- ^ Bolzano 1804.
- ^ Möbius 1827.
- ^ Hamilton 1853.
- ^ Grassmann 2000.
- ^ Peano 1888, ch. IX.
- ^ Banach 1922.
- ^ Dorier 1995, Moore 1995.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. I.1
- ^ e.g. Lang 1993, ch. XII.3., p. 335
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. IX.1
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. VI.3.
- ^ Lang 2002, ch. V.1
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. II.2., pp. 47–48
- ^ Roman 2005, Theorem 1.9, p. 43.
- ^ Blass 1984.
- ^ Halpern 1966, pp. 670–673.
- ^ Artin 1991, Theorem 3.3.13.
- ^ Braun 1993, Th. 3.4.5, p. 291.
- ^ Stewart 1975, Proposition 4.3, p. 52.
- ^ Stewart 1975, Theorem 6.5, p. 74.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 2, p. 45.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. IV.4, Corollary, p. 106.
- ^ Lang 1987, Example IV.2.6.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. VI.6.
- ^ Halmos 1974, p. 28, Ex. 9.
- ^ Lang 1987, Theorem IV.2.1, p. 95.
- ^ Roman 2005, Th. 2.5 and 2.6, p. 49.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. V.1.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. V.3., Corollary, p. 106.
- ^ Lang 1987, Theorem VII.9.8, p. 198.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 8, p. 135–156.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. IX.4.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 1, p. 29.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 1, p. 35.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 3, p. 64.
- ^ Lang 1987, ch. IV.3..
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 2, p. 48.
- ^ Mac Lane 1998.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 1, pp. 31–32.
- ^ Lang 2002, ch. XVI.1
- ^ Roman 2005, Th. 14.3. See also Yoneda lemma.
- ^ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 204–205
- ^ Bourbaki 2004, ch. 2, p. 48.
- ^ Roman 2005, ch. 9.
- ^ Naber 2003, ch. 1.2.
- ^ Treves 1967.
- ^ Bourbaki 1987.
- ^ Kreyszig 1989, §4.11-5
- ^ Kreyszig 1989, §1.5-5
- ^ Choquet 1966, Proposition III.7.2.
- ^ Treves 1967, p. 34–36.
- ^ Lang 1983, Cor. 4.1.2, p. 69.
- ^ Treves 1967, ch. 11.
- ^ Treves 1967, Theorem 11.2, p. 102
- ^ Evans 1998, ch. 5
- ^ Treves 1967, ch. 12.
- ^ Dennery 1996, p.190.
- ^ Lang 1993, Th. XIII.6, p. 349
- ^ Lang 1993, Th. III.1.1
- ^ Choquet 1966, Lemma III.16.11
- ^ Kreyszig 1999, Chapter 11.
- ^ Griffiths 1995, Chapter 1.
- ^ Lang 1993, ch. XVII.3
- ^ Lang 2002, ch. III.1, p. 121.
- ^ Eisenbud 1995, ch. 1.6.
- ^ Varadarajan 1974.
- ^ Lang 2002, ch. XVI.7.
- ^ Lang 2002, ch. XVI.8.
- ^ Luenberger 1997, Section 7.13.
- ^ See representation theory and group representation.
- ^ Lang 1993, Ch. XI.1
- ^ Evans 1998, Th. 6.2.1
- ^ Folland 1992, p. 349 ff.
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, p. 150
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, §4.5
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, p. 57
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, §4.5
- ^ Loomis 1953, Ch. VII.
- ^ Ashcroft & Mermin 1976, Ch. 5.
- ^ Kreyszig 1988, p. 667
- ^ Fourier 1822
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, p. 67
- ^ Ifeachor & Jervis 2002, pp. 3–4, 11
- ^ Wallace Feb 1992
- ^ Ifeachor & Jervis 2002, p. 132
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, §10.2
- ^ Ifeachor & Jervis 2002, pp. 307–310
- ^ Gasquet & Witomski 1999, §10.3
- ^ Schönhage & Strassen 1971.
- ^ Spivak 1999, ch. 3
- ^ Jost 2005. See also Lorentzian manifold.
- ^ Misner, Thorne & Wheeler 1973, ch. 1.8.7, p. 222 and ch. 2.13.5, p. 325
- ^ Jost 2005, ch. 3.1
- ^ Varadarajan 1974, ch. 4.3, Theorem 4.3.27
- ^ Eisenbud 1995, ch. 10.3
- ^ Spivak 1999, ch. 3
- ^ Kreyszig 1991, §34, p. 108.
- ^ Eisenberg & Guy 1979
- ^ Atiyah 1989.
- ^ Artin 1991, ch. 12.
- ^ Weibel 1994.
- ^ Friedlander & Grayson 2005.
- ^ Meyer 2000, Example 5.13.5, p. 436.
- ^ Meyer 2000, Exercise 5.13.15–17, p. 442.
- ^ Coxeter 1987.
References
Linear algebra
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Wikibooks-logo-en-noslogan.svg/40px-Wikibooks-logo-en-noslogan.svg.png)
- Artin, Michael (1991), Algebra, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-89871-510-1
- Blass, Andreas (1984), "Existence of bases implies the axiom of choice", Axiomatic set theory (Boulder, Colorado, 1983), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, pp. 31–33, MR763890
- Brown, William A. (1991), Matrices and vector spaces, New York: M. Dekker, ISBN 978-0-8247-8419-5
- Lang, Serge (1987), Linear algebra, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-96412-6
- Lang, Serge (2002), Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 211, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-95385-4, MR1878556
- Meyer, Carl D. (2000), Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, ISBN 978-0-89871-454-8
- Roman, Steven (2005), Advanced Linear Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 135 (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-24766-3
- Template:De icon van der Waerden, Bartel Leendert (1993), Algebra (9th ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-56799-8
Analysis
- Bourbaki, Nicolas (1987), Topological vector spaces, Elements of mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-13627-9
- Bourbaki, Nicolas (2004), Integration I, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-41129-1
- Braun, Martin (1993), Differential equations and their applications: an introduction to applied mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-97894-9
- BSE-3 (2001) [1994], "Tangent plane", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - Choquet, Gustave (1966), Topology, Boston, MA: Academic Press
- Dennery, Philippe; Krzywicki, Andre (1996), Mathematics for Physicists, Courier Dover Publications, ISBN 978-0-486-69193-0
- Dudley, Richard M. (1989), Real analysis and probability, The Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Mathematics Series, Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, ISBN 978-0-534-10050-6
- Dunham, William (2005), The Calculus Gallery, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-09565-3
- Evans, Lawrence C. (1998), Partial differential equations, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-0772-9
- Folland, Gerald B. (1992), Fourier Analysis and Its Applications, Brooks-Cole, ISBN 978-0-534-17094-3
- Gasquet, Claude; Witomski, Patrick (1999), Fourier Analysis and Applications: Filtering, Numerical Computation, Wavelets, Texts in Applied Mathematics, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-98485-2
- Ifeachor, Emmanuel C.; Jervis, Barrie W. (2002), Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Approach (2nd ed.), Harlow, Essex, England: Prentice-Hall, ISBN 0-201-59619-9
- Krantz, Steven G. (1999), A Panorama of Harmonic Analysis, Carus Mathematical Monographs, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, ISBN 0-88385-031-1
- Kreyszig, Erwin (1988), Advanced Engineering Mathematics (6th ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-85824-2
- Kreyszig, Erwin (1989), Introductory functional analysis with applications, Wiley Classics Library, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-50459-7, MR992618
- Lang, Serge (1983), Real analysis, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 978-0-201-14179-5
- Lang, Serge (1993), Real and functional analysis, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-94001-4
- Loomis, Lynn H. (1953), An introduction to abstract harmonic analysis, Toronto-New York-London: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., pp. pp. x+190
{{citation}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, M.P. (1999), Topological vector spaces (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-98726-2
- Treves, François (1967), Topological vector spaces, distributions and kernels, Boston, MA: Academic Press
Historical references
- Template:Fr icon Banach, Stefan (1922), "Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales (On operations in abstract sets and their application to integral equations)" (PDF), Fundamenta Mathematicae, 3, ISSN 0016-2736
- Template:De icon Bolzano, Bernard (1804), Betrachtungen über einige Gegenstände der Elementargeometrie (Considerations of some aspects of elementary geometry)
- Template:Fr icon Bourbaki, Nicolas (1969), Éléments d'histoire des mathématiques (Elements of history of mathematics), Paris: Hermann
- Dorier, Jean-Luc (1995), "A general outline of the genesis of vector space theory", Historia Mathematica, 22 (3): 227–261, ISSN 0315-0860, MR1347828
- Template:Fr icon Fourier, Jean Baptiste Joseph (1822), Théorie analytique de la chaleur, Chez Firmin Didot, père et fils
- Template:De icon Grassmann, Hermann (1844), Die Lineale Ausdehnungslehre - Ein neuer Zweig der Mathematik, reprint: Extension Theory, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, 2000, ISBN 978-0-8218-2031-5
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|other1-first=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|other1-last=
ignored (help) - Hamilton, William Rowan (1853), Lectures on Quaternions, Royal Irish Academy
- Template:De icon Möbius, August Ferdinand (1827), Der Barycentrische Calcul : ein neues Hülfsmittel zur analytischen Behandlung der Geometrie (Barycentric calculus: a new utility for an analytic treatment of geometry)
- Moore, Gregory H. (1995), "The axiomatization of linear algebra: 1875-1940", Historia Mathematica, 22 (3): 262–303, ISSN 0315-0860
- Template:It icon Peano, Giuseppe (1888), Calcolo Geometrico secondo l'Ausdehnungslehre di H. Grassmann preceduto dalle Operazioni della Logica Deduttiva, Turin
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Further references
- Ashcroft, Neil; Mermin, N. David (1976), Solid State Physics, Toronto: Thomson Learning, ISBN 978-0-03-083993-1
- Atiyah, Michael Francis (1989), K-theory, Advanced Book Classics (2nd ed.), Addison-Wesley, ISBN 978-0-201-09394-0, MR1043170
- Bourbaki, Nicolas (1989), General Topology. Chapters 1-4, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-64241-1
- Coxeter, Harold Scott MacDonald (1987), Projective Geometry (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-96532-1
- Eisenberg, Murray; Guy, Robert (1979), "A proof of the hairy ball theorem", The American Mathematical Monthly, 86 (7): 572–574, ISSN 0002-9890
- Eisenbud, David (1995), Commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-94268-1; 978-0-387-94269-8, MR1322960
{{citation}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help) - Friedlander, Eric; Grayson, Daniel, eds. (2005), Handbook of K-Theory, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-30436-4
- Goldrei, Derek (1996), Classic Set Theory: A guided independent study (1st ed.), London: Chapman and Hall, ISBN 0-412-60610-0
- Griffiths, David J. (1995), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-124405-1
- Halmos, Paul R. (1974), Finite-dimensional vector spaces, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90093-3
- Halpern, James D. (1966), "Bases in Vector Spaces and the Axiom of Choice", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 17 (3): 670–673, ISSN 0002-9939
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Husemoller, Dale (1994), Fibre Bundles (3rd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-94087-8
- Jost, Jürgen (2005), Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis (4th ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-25907-7
- Kreyszig, Erwin (1991), Differential geometry, New York: Dover Publications, pp. pp. xiv+352, ISBN 978-0-486-66721-8
{{citation}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - Kreyszig, Erwin (1999), Advanced Engineering Mathematics, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-15496-2
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|Edition=
ignored (|edition=
suggested) (help) - Luenberger, David (1997), Optimization by vector space methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-18117-0
- Mac Lane, Saunders (1998), Categories for the Working Mathematician (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-98403-2
- Misner, Charles W.; Thorne, Kip; Wheeler, John Archibald (1973), Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0
- Naber, Gregory L. (2003), The geometry of Minkowski spacetime, New York: Dover Publications, ISBN 978-0-486-43235-9, MR2044239
- Template:De icon Schönhage, A.; Strassen, Volker (1971), "Schnelle Multiplikation großer Zahlen (Fast multiplication of big numbers)" (PDF), Computing, 7: 281–292, ISSN 0010-485X
- Spivak, Michael (1999), A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry (Volume Two), Houston, TX: Publish or Perish
- Stewart, Ian (1975), Galois Theory, Chapman and Hall Mathematics Series, London: Chapman and Hall, ISBN 0-412-10800-3
- Varadarajan, V. S. (1974), Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-535732-3
- Wallace, G.K. (Feb 1992), "The JPEG still picture compression standard", IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 38 (1): xviii–xxxiv, ISSN 0098-3063
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: year (link) - Weibel, Charles A. (1994). An introduction to homological algebra. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Vol. 38. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-55987-4. MR 1269324. OCLC 36131259.