Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 39

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:NawlinWiki

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hc606 (talk | contribs) at 16:59, 15 October 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Colorware

Hello, I had recently posted an article on the subject of Colorware. I noticed that you have marked it for deletion and understand your status as an administrator on Wikipedia and was wondering what could be added to this article to further show its reasoning for staying on Wikipedia. I feel that on the basis of this article being deleted for its 'promotional' status is argumentative because my reasons for writing this article was not to promote it but was to create an area of understanding in what the company does as well as its notability in both nationally/internationally recognized magazines and websites. Also I can assure you that this article is not a 'one-edit' type of article that can be found on Wikipedia, but rather one that will have continuos changes in which I plan to improve upon for my college class that this has been written for. Please contact me on how this article can be improved upon so that it fits ALL criteria to remain as a Wikipedia article. Thank you and best regards! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicogsu (talk • contribs) 03:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Priscilla Renea

Do you think some salt would be appropriate? Also, could you give me the names of the recent recreators so I can check for similar-named article creation? Thanks. Bongomatic 01:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & cheers, Bongomatic 01:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colorware

Hello, I had recently posted an article on the subject of Colorware. I noticed that you have marked it for deletion and understand your status as an administrator on Wikipedia and was wondering what could be added to this article to further show its reasoning for staying on Wikipedia. I feel that on the basis of this article being deleted for its 'promotional' status is argumentative because my reasons for writing this article was not to promote it but was to create an area of understanding in what the company does as well as its notability in both nationally/internationally recognized magazines and websites. Also I can assure you that this article is not a 'one-edit' type of article that can be found on Wikipedia, but rather one that will have continuos changes in which I plan to improve upon for my college class that this has been written for. Please contact me on how this article can be improved upon so that it fits ALL criteria to remain as a Wikipedia article. Thank you and best regards!

Are you kidding me?

Why would you delete my Retro Fox page! It deserve's to be on this website.

Dante3000 aka Richard Verducci

I know I haven't made many Wiki entries, however, after 100 podcasts over so many years and a rich background, after deleting my page seconds after it was created... I think you're taking your job a little /too/ seriously. 

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hand of Despair (talk • contribs) 01:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Runescape help for newbies

Hi there Nawlin. I saw you said that Runescape help for newbies was an expired PROD in your deletion reason, but I'd only added the PROD tag a few minutes before, and it looked like a user was attempting to contest the deletion. Although you also said it was spam/advertising (WP:CSD#G11), which would overrule the PROD, except from I can't recall seeing anything on the page which sounded like spam. Although that is from memory. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Zurb

Hello, just noticed that Zurb wikipedia page was deleted. Can you state the reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.253.52 (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per WP:CORP (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ZURB does comply with WR:CORP. There are a number of credible third party sources which have reviewed ZURB, here are just some:

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/172474/zurb_launches_notable_web_service_and_iphone_app.html http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/23/collaborate-on-web-docs-now-collaborate-on-web-designs-with-notable/ http://www.macworld.com/article/142951/2009/09/notable.html

Can we list the proper references on the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.253.52 (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PCWorld has written a different second article about us here: http://www.pcworld.com/article/172616/collaborate_on_web_site_designs_and_code_with_firefox_addon_notable.html

PCWorld is also hosting our tool here: http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,81100-order,3/description.html

MacWorld and PCWorld are not press releases, the press releases are here:

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/prnewswire/2009/09/23/prnewswire200909231315PR_NEWS_USPR_____SF79317.html http://www.entrepreneur.com/PRNewswire/release/208752.html

As you can see PCWorld, MacWorld, and TechCrunch all have written about us separately, I believe this is enough relevance to have an article in Wikipedia. If do not believe so, here are some more reference links:

The project we did for Pie Ranch http://www.cca.edu/about/press/2009/pie-ranch-serves-sustainable-farming

CrunchBase profile http://www.crunchbase.com/company/zurb

Is this enough reference points to consider letting the Zurb article stay in wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.29.35 (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of Waldport Press

Would it be possible to get advice on how to bring out the "noteworthy" aspects of our publishing company so that the page is worthy to stay in wikipedia? I am not aware of many, if any, publishers that focus on new, first time authors enabling them to actually keep a significant portion the profit. This is highly unusual unless you go to self publishing which has no marketing and no professional copy editing. I put the page up at the request of one of our authors who wants other potential authors to know this unique approach. He wanted to add to it but it was deleted before he could get to it. Including the links at the bottom.

It is in fact much like the Press at Waldport, OR that was in one of the conscientious objector camps during the second world war. This press also was small and printed works by authors who were before unknown such as William Everson

Is this ready for the main wiki?

Hello.

A few months ago you deleted a page, Managerzone. Now, as it's been deleted before, i didn't want to create a new page on the main wiki. I have however made the article at User:Overthetop2/Managerzone. What i was wondering, is it good enough to be placed in the main wiki now? If not, how can i improve it to make it Wikipedia-worthy?

Thanks in advance for your answer.

Overthetop2 (talk) 07:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:74.14.109.101

This user is IP hopping, using IPs within that range. They have been blocked several times within the past 10 minutes. I've sent an abuse report to abuse@bell.ca which traced it to Bell Canada. I also sent them an e-mail from my "eric_dilettante@disney.com" e-mail address, which has an network abuse group becuase Bell Canada is under contract by The Walt Disney Company for their phone services in Canada and at www.disneyparks.ca - Thank you. --A3RO (mailbox) 11:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I opened up an investigations page, here - but I think I did it wrong, could you please delete it; since I took the liberty upon myself to contact Bell Canada through my network address. Thanks. --A3RO (mailbox) 11:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

why do you keep deleting my page on reed clifton? the guy is amazing and very well known in the music community . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchunglava (talk • contribs) 23:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm recreating "Law of the Horse" article

After reading about a banned user's suggested article ("Law of the Horse", which you just deleted), I looked into it to see whether it would be a legitimate, worthwhile addition to Wikipedia. So I looked up the sources, read them enough to establish that everything in the proposed article was true, found one spot where there wasn't adequate sourcing, then looked that up too. So I've now changed the article somewhat, and I can vouch for everything in it, independently of what anyone else thinks or wants. So I'll add back the article, as I've amended it, and we can avoid drama, help the readers and help Wikipedia. If you have any problem with that, please discuss it with me. Thanks. -- Noroton (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can you please stop deleting the page i am creating about the infamous reed clifton . it wasnt easy to get an interview with him —Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchunglava (talk • contribs) 21:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lock Mark Levin, please

NW, will you please fully protect the Mark Levin page? He's trying to start an edit war live on his radio show, in response to what someone else has posted. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of user contributions?

Hi NW, I'd like to have my user contributions deleted completely so I could start with a clean slate. Can you please help me acheive this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbrener (talk • contribs) 16:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


hello live person. can you help me find the meeting place on irc for the wiki chem users? you already shot me a fast message before. Wiki's huge. Much to learn. So, I don't understand your name. would it be nawlins singular (new orleans), 'cause that's obscure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbillinghurst (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last Pictures

I recently authored a wiki about the NYC based limited liability corporation, Last Pictures. This is not just another pseudo production company that makes youtube videos. They were admitted into the 2008 Sundance Film Festival and have been written up all of the internet by a variety of film based webpages, such as slashfilms.com. Their work has also been referenced by the New York Times! If this is not a reputable source then I don't know what is. When I first created a page I included a summary taken directly from their website, and I realize that this was not appropriate. I then deleted the summary and left only a table of their portfolio and the simple explanation that Last Pictures is a NY based film production company. This information is completely factual and should be verifiable based on their admission into Sundance Film Festival 2008. Dozy42 (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EF rights?

Hello. Thanks for adding "Peter Dais" to edit filter #58. Could you tell me what process I need to go through to be able to view the filters? I see them listed all the time when processing block requests at WP:AIV, but I never handle the blocks since I cannot see the filter details. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 21:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I looked at Special:UserRights this morning I saw that the box was editable by admins, but I was hesitant to actually check it for myself (what with transparency and all). — Kralizec! (talk) 21:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I appreciate it! — Kralizec! (talk) 21:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, it is nice to see that I am not the only olde tyme admin around here who actually replies to people's messages on the other person's talk page (rather than "centralizing" discussion on your own page and expecting the other person to watchlist it). Additionally I am glad that I am not the only admin who does not use the funky talk header things that come up when you go to edit a talk page. — Kralizec! (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question re. foreign language redirects.

Hi there, User:KembanganGreen has been adding Lithuanian redirects to Formula 1 grands prix in the English namespace. Does that warrant deletion, or what is the proper thing to do in this case?

Cheers, XXX antiuser 21:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Park protection

Hi there. There have been a handful of new users who have been making legitimate edit requests on the talk page for South Park, and I noticed that you protected it in August of 2008. I'm not 100% familiar with the markup in protection templates, but to me it looks like that protection was due to be lifted in March 2009, but never was. I just wanted to leave you this message to see if there was some sort of oversight. New episodes of this show begin tomorrow, and it could generate new interest in the article, thus potentially some helpful edits from newer users. I also understand that it would open the floodgates to an article that has a long history of being subjected to vandalism, but I would say that 14 months of protection has been long enough. Just wanted to know if it was cool with you if I requested unprotection of the page. If the vandals do indeed return en masse, protection can be requested again. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, the page had been semiprotected since December 2007 - I just added move protection in 2008. I have removed the semiprotection against editing -- let's see what happens. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks. Hopefully nothing too bad. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 22:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion Modjo (Energy)18:37, 24 September 2009

Nawlin, You said I need references showing that the product is notable, why are pages of products on wikipedia that have no references at all? This site has one reference:NOS_(drink), from a indepentend review site called energy fanatic. I had exactly the same reference plus an additional other 5. Another example: Full_Throttle_(drink) has also one link at all, the same we use from the Biz Journal. How can it be that these sites are all not deleted, and mine got deleted immediately? You mentioned that the article needs news articles as reference or other independent sources, I had 3 news arlicle references and one independent product review as references. I will repost the article with a additional independent resource and hope that this time it won't be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia222 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Julia222 (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Could you please unprotect the page so I can post the article again? thanks Julia222 (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your immediate deletion of Five9_Inc Page

Nawlin,

You deleted this page almost immediately after it was created. When I went back this week to update it with the information that would make it significant, it was already gone. Wiki pages are never perfect or "final" from day one. Please un-delete it so I can edit, update and improve the article, without it being promotional. Thank you. Predictive (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. Please allow me a little time to work on it.

Predictive (talk) 21:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nawlin - can you please take a look at the page in my userspace User:Predictive/Five9 Inc before I re-post it, to check for sources etc. Thx.

Predictive (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Predictive (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five9 Inc, fyi--Hu12 (talk) 19:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from Yelptini

Hello NawlinWiki, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Yelptini has been removed. It was removed by Doctav with the following edit summary '(removed proposed deletion message, added citation from forbes.com and additional external references)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Doctav before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of overweight actors in United States cinema

You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Dem Bombaclot Boyz

Hello NawlinWiki, I was creating a page about a North Carolina local band, Dem Bombaclot Boyz when you marked and deleted the page. The argument against Dem Bombaclot Boyz according to Ar. 7 is that there is no sign of significance. I'd like to argue against this claim and have the page reinstated (with revisions stating importance):

  • The Band has been featured on Chapel Hill's local radio station, WXYC
  • The Band has performed twice at the venue 'Local 501'
  • The Band has been featured in the college's local newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel

If you feel that Dem Bombaclot Boyz does not meet Wikipedia article criteria, let me know and I will continue building facts.

Thank you for your time and contributions to the Wikipedia project.

God's death punishments

Were can I add this table? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God's_death_punishments

This is a very useful information.

Thank you for your time. Ptrwatson418 (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Academy for Electronic & Information Technology Services

Arab Academy for Electronic & Information Technology Services (Arab Academy) is a business entity in Egypt that provides services to learners of Arabic from all over the world. Its web site is: www.arabacademy.com Its owners are: Sanaa Ghanem - www.arabacademy.com/ghanem Sheikh Saleh Kamel (you can check him out in wiki)

Our page explained the different services that we offered. I therefore do not see why you considered this page as unworthy of being in wiki. This page is quite similar to a number of other pages for other institutions in Egypt (or even those providing language training services in other languages).

Arab Academy provides high quality services and its program is being used by credible institutions in the United States. If you wish to have us provide you with our company profile or any further information, do let us know.

I do hope you release it back into wiki or at least let us know what you would like to see changed in it.

HI, can you tell me why you deleted my page and also the talk page please? I think my talk message justified the page and as it was deleted too without even a response, I am extremely confused and disappointed. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSonicNet (talk • contribs) 17:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Duntocher Hibernian F.C.

I think you were a little too quick to SD this article. I was in the process of fixing the material when it disappeared. The article was linked to from Drumchapel Amateur F.C.. The original author of the page obviously made a mess of it but it was a valid and notable article. Inomyabcs (talk) 13:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Salah

Wow, that was really quick. Thank you. I'm flattered that you consider me the author. I didn't create the article so I never thought of myself in this way but I have contributed a lot to it. Thanks again. // Gbern3 (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Randazza

I didn't keep a copy of my first post to this new blp and want to retrive it so I can add my sources. Can you help me out? I didn't realize that the new article review process was as quick as mere seconds.↜ (‘Just M E ’here , now) 16:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thx! :^)↜ (‘Just M E ’here , now) 16:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Movieviral

You've deleted my wikipedia page on Movieviral.com for advertisement, however, the reason i created article is only for the history and informations on the site. I did NOT advertise it, there wasnt any message saying "come to our site, its great". My article is also very similar to the ones for other media sources like /films and Google. Please reconsider the article. Also, if you feel that certain parts of the article contain advertisement, please tell me so i can edit the page. (H3llo41 (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Removal of PROD from Jacksonville Ninja

Hello NawlinWiki, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Jacksonville Ninja has been removed. It was removed by MaxMercy with the following edit summary '(See talk section.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with MaxMercy before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 19:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crocus ancyrensis

You recently deleted the above new article - it was not very big and was a very bad translation from (?Turkish or something) but I think there was the core of a genuine article in there somewhere. I didn't have time to look at it closely before it was gone. Would you be able to drop the deleted content onto User:HeartofaDog/Crocus so that I can take a proper look at it? Thanks. HeartofaDog (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar Wrigley

Hello again, NawlinWiki … regarding the {{Prod}} you stuck on this article, note that the subject is referenced from both List of Mensans and Mensa International, and its deletion would create redlinks … FYI, I'm thinking about contesting it. :-) Happy Editing! — 141.156.161.245 (talk · contribs) 04:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Oscar Wrigley, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Happy Editing! — 141.156.161.245 (talk · contribs) 23:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion Modjo (Energy)18:37, 24 September 2009

Nawlin, You said I need references showing that the product is notable, why are pages of products on wikipedia that have no references at all? This site has one reference:NOS_(drink), from a indepentend review site called energy fanatic. I had exactly the same reference plus an additional other 5. Another example: Full_Throttle_(drink) has also one link at all, the same we use from the Biz Journal. How can it be that these sites are all not deleted, and mine got deleted immediately? You mentioned that the article needs news articles as reference or other independent sources, I had 3 news arlicle references and one independent product review as references. I will repost the article with a additional independent resource and hope that this time it won't be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia222 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Julia222 (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Could you please unprotect the page so I can post the article again? thanks Julia222 (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your immediate deletion of Five9_Inc Page

Nawlin,

You deleted this page almost immediately after it was created. When I went back this week to update it with the information that would make it significant, it was already gone. Wiki pages are never perfect or "final" from day one. Please un-delete it so I can edit, update and improve the article, without it being promotional. Thank you. Predictive (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. Please allow me a little time to work on it.

Predictive (talk) 21:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nawlin - can you please take a look at the page in my userspace User:Predictive/Five9 Inc before I re-post it, to check for sources etc. Thx.

Predictive (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Predictive (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five9 Inc, fyi--Hu12 (talk) 19:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from Yelptini

Hello NawlinWiki, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Yelptini has been removed. It was removed by Doctav with the following edit summary '(removed proposed deletion message, added citation from forbes.com and additional external references)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Doctav before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of overweight actors in United States cinema

You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Dan Perry

Hello NawlinWiki, I am curious to why the article on Dan Perry has been deleted, I believe the page should stay because of the recent press about him planning a new reality show and the fact he is classed as a celebrity, and wiki does have alot of pages on celebrities on wiki!

Removal of One in a Million charity

Hello NawlinWiki, i am just writing to ask you how we as a charity (One in a Million, www.oneinamillion.org.uk) may be able to host a charity informative page here at wikipedia, without it violating advertising/promotional terms & conditions. Please get in touch via wiki, OR email lauren.conroy@oneinamillion.org.uk
THANKS! --OneinaMillionBradford (talk) 13:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion on MuscleMeds

Hello NawlinWiki, I completely understand why you deleted the page, i was actually just putting up the product listing, a narrative only describing the company, not promoting it was to follow. I will first draft the narrative and then add everything else. I was only putting up the company info and history, much like some others nabisco kraft foods. Sorry for the upfront lack of info, wont happen again. thanks,joepile —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joepile (talk • contribs) 21:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Entrepreneurs Bootcamp

Can you please rollback your deletion, and tag the article with NOTABLE and/or AFD? The article needs improvement, but an event at the 02 with 5,000 people at it, repeated annually, is worth a WP page. I value your scrutiny, but no need to be trigger-happy.Andrewjlockley (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Good Doctor (Computer Clinic)

Hello, just noticed that The Good Doctor (Computer Clinic) wikipedia page was deleted with the comment: (A7: Article about a group or club, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject).

Please, rollback the deletion. The article was placed as a disambiguation measure due to popular demand to demonstrate connection between the name and the field of operation of the aforementioned company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoodDoctor.ca (talk • contribs) 23:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nushawn Williams

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nushawn Williams, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nushawn Williams. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Location (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Georgia Chamber of Commerce page

This is in response to the speedy deletion of the Georgia Chamber of Commerce page. This page was not meant to be promotional, but rather a history of the organization and how we differ from local chambers of commerce. We could internally link to several different Wikipedia pages (see George M. Israel, III), and we have been featured in many state and national publications. Please advise as to how we can change our copy to reflect the Wikipedia rules. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyarber (talk • contribs) 14:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The entire article is written in a non-neutral and promotional tone, with phrases like "has been an effective advocate for business", "ensuring that Georgia remains a place where companies can thrive", "has an enviable success rate", and "one of the most transformative and exciting efforts". Please read WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giuseppe Panza

I'd like to re-create the entry for Giuseppe Panza. As I understand it you deleted an earlier attempt at creating an entry for its failure to properly assert notability. Panza is a very highly regarded and well known collector, sufficiently so that Abbeville Press published a biography. I would think that this constitutes appropriate notability per WP criteria which, if properly asserted in creating the entry, would suffice. I would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. ASmallPatchOfShadow (talk) 00:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Socks and Shaggy Bevo

[[1]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect request

Hi, you semiprotected English Reformation over a year ago. Can it be unprotected again, at least on a trial basis? I don't need it myself (since I'm a registered user), but indefinite semiprotection seems unnecessary for the article. Thanks! Pais (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Threat for Creating an Article

"he next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Richard Ringer, you will be blocked from editing. Immediately reposting an article that was deleted by AFD, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Ringer, is a good way to get yourself blocked."

See if I care.

Independent Music Source (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi why did you change The Edge (magazine) to redirect to the wessex scene its a completely different publication so it makes no sense to redirect to it. Do I need to put more citation on the article for it stay are something?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_39&oldid=320043908"