Talk:Government simulation game
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Government simulation game article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Government simulation game" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1 |
An editor has reassessed this article to determine if it meets the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article. The article was delisted. For further information see the reassessment page. Date: 20:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC) |
Government simulation game was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
Politics C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
|
|
Note: Although this article was previously subject to AfD that reached no consensus, the article has been entirely rewritten since that time. There were good objections to the old article that were raised during the AfD, but the original reasons for the AfD are no longer valid. At the time of the last nomination, the article looked like this.
Archive 1
I archived the talk page in order to remove redundant and pointless discussions made during the first two quarters of 2006. Trust me when I say it says nothing interesting: it's basically quarrel over which games should be included, how much, and a lot of WP:POINTs. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 02:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Original research
Well, even though my AfD failed to reach a consensus, it's quite clear that it needs a LOT of improvement. I took the first steps. Requests for references have now been put into the article after virtually EVERY sentence, and even though I've looked I haven't found any source that would pass WP:RS. If it remains in this state for too long; I will simply nominate it again. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 02:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Added to Wikiproject CVG
...To possibly generate some further interest in improving the article.
Stubified
- I'm stubifying the article. The topic is valid, but I think it will need a rewrite. Give it a couple months to see what people can contribute. Tarinth 13:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Update -- I've added a history and references section, and added one of the earlier games for this category. I'll add more when I can spend some more time with it.
Question
Why are the 80soft (www.80soft.com) games missing? They're by far the single biggest publisher (in number of titles) of political sims, but they are not even mentioned in the article. While dumbed-down crap like the Political Machine, is.
You can also add Hidden Agenda, a freeware game from the mid 90s which was a big influence to the list.
Would the game Call of Duty 4 work on this page, seeing as it is about a radical political movement shown through a militaristic view? ABK20062 (talk) 12:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not a simulation game, no. 98.168.204.179 (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
To-do List
(Feel free to add things here)
- Identify more geopolitical games
- Find out about some of the more recent products,
including Political Machines (described by Wired: http://www.wired.com/news/games/0,2101,64625,00.html ) - Find out if there are any games worthy of inclusion that focus on political campaigns, elections or administration in countries other than the United States
Locate some screenshots or promotional art for a couple of the games and add to the article
- Hey I once had this game on PS2 were you took control of a communist party and had to bring a communist party to power that I have been searching for on the internet as I can't remeber the name! I sold it beacuse I was too young for it and didnt get the concept but I can't for the life of me remeber the name! I will post if I do. Spose I'm just letting you know there are other political based games out there!
RuSTy1989 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
online nation simulation games
This article should probably discuss the fairly recent emergence of online nation simulation games like NationStates and CyberNations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.248.222.34 (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
GA on hold
Some images need source, as soon as that is addresed I will gladly pass it. -凶 14:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Images sourced. Crimsonfox 11:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
GA
Images in article has been sourced, article has passed Good Article nomination and has been listed as such.-凶 23:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Inquire about merger
There seems to be much overlap between this genre and Grand strategy game (especially the categories). I am wondering if it would be appropriate to merge that article (or category) with this one. SharkD 20:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- I think it is a related category of game but not exactly the same. A merger into Grand strategy game doesn't seem appropriate, considering this is considered a Good Article. Tarinth 13:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah.. rather different. They're fundamentally different genres. 98.168.204.179 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC).
HOW THE [edit: explitive] DO U PLAY
I WANT TO KNOW HOW TO PLAY OR I WILL QUIT —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tgmille245 (talk • contribs) 04:20:28, August 19, 2007 (UTC).
- Priceless...Itake 11:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BalanceOfPower.png
Image:BalanceOfPower.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:President Forever 2008.jpg
Image:President Forever 2008.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:PoliticalMachine.jpg
Image:PoliticalMachine.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Political game redirected here
It was a brief mention of the subject that this article already covered in more detail. You might want to check that article's previous state to see if there's something this one could use. --Kizor (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Nationsims
I visited this page looking for info on online forum games like 'Superpower 2' and 'Nations'. There used to be a page just for them, but 'nationsim' now just redirects here. What has happened?? Urpunkt (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Ars Regendi
WHEN Ars Regendi gets removed haphazardly then OTHER external links to less important games HAVE to get removed too! Malone70 (talk) 09:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)