User talk:DangerousPanda

This is DangerousPanda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15: 15 days

Bubble tea!

-down load | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Deletion review for Jargon of the Rush Limbaugh Show

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jargon of the Rush Limbaugh Show. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Reasons

No it is not! I do not use multiple accounts. When I create a new account, I make myself unable to get back into the old account by changing the password of the old account into one I don't know. I created new accounts because I don't think anybody would believe the truth about why I changed username if I told them. The reason why I created new accounts was the same reason why I changed username. Why I changed my name is important because other people said I should be blocked indefinitely because the reason why I changed my name was because I wanted to hide some bad edits that I had made in the past.

Soliciting Bwilkins' Help

I hope you do not mind. I found you by chance, and you are apparently wise in the world of wiki. I am sort of new, and interested in developing articles on people I am interested in. Anyways, I wanted to start this page about this artist Ed Giecek - and after User:TheRealFennShysa asked me to, I even noted several sources as references with "significant coverage listed from independent third-party sources included." But, again they are threatening to take it off again. This guy Ed Giecek is an important artist, and his daughter is this singer and activist that I really like. She sings with the Deftones. And, her father seems to be all over the place. I found him on so many websites as an artist. What makes him famous enough or not, and why does wiki think the references are "poorly sourced?" I found the sources from many places, including art galleries. I find the Talk:Ed Giecek to be offensive, and it seems to discourage someone like me from even trying. And I really have tried. Please give your advice. Thank you. User talk:Solutionhead Solutionhead (talk) 21:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly see nothing that makes he notable ... there's hundreds of thousands of published artists/photog's, but I see nothing that makes this guy worthy of an article, IMHO. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time. I think Ed Giecek meets the requirements for notability, because his art work is in museums, and yes, published, and I found his name on thousands of internet sites. I thoroughly read notable, and maybe I am missing something... but it seems this artist meets the requirements. Thank you so much for taking the time. Solutionhead (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Joseph Peabody

Can you tell me why User:7SeriesBOT deleted the talk page for Joseph Peabody at the request of one user? Instead of deleting a particular topic? Seems like an unneeded step that forces others to recreate the biography page header, etc., from scratch. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you read from the FAQ, 7SeriesBOT only deletes blank pages: if there had been biography page headers, etc then WildBot would not have tagged it for deletion. I can confirm that this is the case, looking at the history:

12:53, 14 April 2010 7SeriesBOT (talk | contribs | block) deleted "Talk:Joseph Peabody" ‎ (Only one contributor who requested deletion under WP:CSD#G7) (view/restore)
(diff) 12:52, 14 April 2010 . . WildBot (talk | contribs | block) (21 bytes) (No ambiguous links left; rather than leave the talk page blank, as only contributor WildBot is requesting deletion)
(diff) 00:59, 14 April 2010 . . WildBot (talk | contribs | block) (67 bytes) (Found ambiguous links to second officer)

Both WildBot and 7SeriesBOT acted as per their design, and nobody has to take any "unneeded steps" (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark me clueless or uneducated in the ways of Wiki, but why would a bot delete a blank page? -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've read the bot's FAQ, right? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

send me copy of my deleted article

please send me a copy of my deleted article (it needs to be re-written).

Thanks.

Mofoq (talk) 20:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's your relationship with/to User:FarrisonHord? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion declined: Walter Kaner

well, i saw the criteria for speed deletion, and having looked not just at the number of contributions, but at their actual content, i saw that actually no real changes or added information was present: they were just adding of categories, templates, links, and some small rephrasing. Still, since i haven't contributed much to en.wiki (i come from it.wiki), if you say that the text does not fulfill speed deletion criteria, i believe you. Do you think is more appropriate to tag the "unmodified" paragraphs as copyviol? Lucha (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just re-write it a bit and clean it up? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my article?

Why did you delete my article on Popstation? More importantly, what more proof do i have to give for it to be good enough for a wikipedia article? i have tried looking everywhere on Google for other sites who know about Popstation.com, the only results i get when typing in Popstation are about some dumb gaming console named "Pop Station" or P station or whatever the heck it's called. No other site out there on the internet knows about Popstation.com, so it shouldn't be deleted. Morts623 (talk) 07:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have answered your own question: the fact that you cannot find reliable, third party sources anywhere to support the importance is de facto proof that Wikipedia should not have an article. This project is not the Yellow Pages, it's an encyclopedia of actual knowledge. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jbolden1517

I've got to say that I'm shocked that Jbolden1517 was allowed to return. Does it mean nothing that as recently as a week ago he was still breathing threats over at Wikipedia Review? Eugene (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As we can never verify who's who on Wikipedia Review as it's not part of Wikipedia, it's always a challenging situation. I will, however, recommend that the two of you remain distant from each other ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jsteinray‎ and article Johannes Steinray

Could you please take a look at this situation. I've asked them twice now to stop deleting the CSD template and told them to please use the {{hangon}} template instead. They don't appear to be listening. Padillah (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you were wondering...[1] Padillah (talk) 11:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it ... and see that there's now more than one set of eyes involved. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indiavision rises from the dead yet again

Similar versions of the article on Indiavision have been previously speedy (and other?) deleted, primarily as spam. See [2], [3], and [4].

Also, the user, and one IP address, has been blocked. See [5].

I documented this on the article's talk page and am merely passing this on to an admin for oversight. I'll put this on the blocking admin's talk page (User:YellowMonkey) as well. No reply needed. -Quartermaster (talk) 12:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Buns!

..erm, I mean Bot! :-o

Best wishes. --Haruth (talk) 17:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NH

He's still getting at least another 12 hours off, but if you feel he's genuinely learned, then I won't have a problem with you unblocking him. DS (talk) 22:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

For some reason I remebered that you provide copies of deleted articles. I see you don't, can you please refer me to someone who can do it? Regards--Gilisa (talk) 06:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will in most situations ... which ones were you thinking of? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not exactly an article...It's an RfC that was deleted very shortly after the admin gave his comment. I don't remeber exactly when the RfC was closed or opened because I can't find any diffs, obviously. So,can anything be done?--Gilisa (talk) 07:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd need more details to try and find it. Normally we don't undelete RFC's ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ho ok, I need it to appeal against community decision that was proposed by admin George William Herbert. The RfC was opened and closed on March (I believe that the end of it). GWH is the one whose comment was requested, me and Mbz1 were those who request the comment. Regards--Gilisa (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, procedurally, it was closed and deleted correctly. I cannot see how anything good can come out of userfying it or undeleting it in any way ... this really appears to be one of those "put it down, and walk away" situations. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not suggesting that it was closed improperly. Look, as far as I know, I have the right to appeal, and I intend to use many different diffs to make my points clear. Among them, the RfC is only one (part of it actually). So, can you provide it after all? --Gilisa (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...but an uncertified RFC never existed, and its diff's can't be used for any purpose whatsoever. Show me where the proposal is ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:46, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a question.

Hello Bwilkins! I hope you are having a nice weekend. I feel sorry to interomp you, but since you had made a comment on my talk page where you were explaining to me that the expression, as you put it in my talk page, "kiss your sorry ass good-bye", quite similar to the ones that I receved on my talk page from User:AlasdairGreen27, namely "kiss your sorry ass goodbye", and "I will drag your sorry ass" are not a violation of WP:NPA because, you said that it was I that had to beleve that you beleve... sorry, I couldn´t get it... Here [6] is your comment in the context of my block that happend just after I made a ANI report about a user that told me that on my talk page [7]. I am really sorry to bother you with this, but I made a research on WP and I couldn´t find nothing that supports your theory, so I got really courios about it... You know, it was always been my dream to say profanities to people I dislike, and that fact not to be considered personal attack, but unfortunatelly, my education and my way of life doesn´t allow me to behave like that anyway. :) It would be extremely helpfull and important for me to understand what you meant by your words, so when you find yourself with time, please explain it to me. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're not interrupting at all, and be assured that I understand where you are coming from. For a good chunk of my Wikipedia life, I was a regular patroller of WP:WQA - the location where complaints go related to WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Neither are typically blockable offences, so WQA is there to try and assist the parties in "getting along". Occasionally, the WP:NPA is bad enough that we would recommend going to WP:ANI (racism and other hate-related attacks, for example). You will note that Hersford also agreed that the comments were not violations of WP:NPA, but that they were perhaps uncivil. Incivility, unless extreme and persistent, are not blockable offences (oddly, there is also policy from an ArbComm case that profanity is permitted, within reason). So, although I concur that the comments may have been uncivil - which is not typically blockable - can you show me where you think that it does meet WP:NPA? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your words, but, I think I wasn´t very clear, what I really wanted is for you to repeat to me the sentence that you posted on my talk page, you know, the one that sounded something like, "it is only PA if you beleave thet you beleave...", you´ll know, after all, they were your words... I wasn´t asking if another admin agreed or not about it, I understand English enough to understand that User:Hersfold had agreed with you, but I just had some difficulties regarding your sentence and its exact meaning there...

Regarding the specifical expression being WP:NPA violation, I can´t really remember now exactly where I got the confirmation that in that situation, it was. When I find it I´ll let you know. But, after all, it looks like we are in "your" area... if you find it first, please let me know! Anyway, I´m really interested in the sentence you posted. I am extremely greatfull for your spared time in dealing this with me. :) FkpCascais (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I recall, I was trying to install some light brevity, something about if you believed that he was actually calling your ass "sorry" ... I had planned on going further and wondering if your donkey actually edited Wikipedia, then it might have been even more of an NPA against your "apologetic donkey", but I held off. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Press TV controversies

you deleted the page "Talk:Press TV controversies" that is a talk page, not a main article. how does one discuss issues on content of the page without the talk page? sure if need be remove a post that maybe inappropriate but articles come with their requisite talk pages in order to prevent warring. Not sure why this was removed? Lihaas (talk) 10:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the FAQ? The page was blank - there was no discussion on it yet. I see that you have started one, that's good - it won't likely be deleted...at least not by a bot (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting Pages

User:A1DF67 has been renamed User:Bowei Huang 2. [8] Can you please redirect User:Bowei Huang to User:Bowei Huang 2 and User talk:Bowei Huang to User talk:Bowei Huang 2?

Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U.S.-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce

Hello there, why is U.S.-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce page being deleted? Tuscumbia (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You'll note that the article is not being deleted, a blank talkpage was already deleted. See User:7SeriesBOT#FAQ. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Grazie! Tuscumbia (talk) 14:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mentorship

Please note my offer regarding CharlieJS13 here. He actually seemed to have learned part of his lesson during his third block (note that he didn't take off changing the credits again), so I'm willing to believe that he is educable. That doesn't keep me from being nervous about unblocking him.—Kww(talk) 14:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nervousness aside, if you can guide him away from the dark side, then we all gain. Good luck! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DangerousPanda. You have new messages at Ahmed shahi's talk page.
Message added 11:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

As you commented on the unblock request, I thought I would contact you as I have reviewed the scenario and believe that full protection may be a good alternative action here, as there seem to be issues between an IP and other users even after this edit warring block. I may be missing context though, thus I would appreciate your comment. Thanks for your time Taelus (talk) 11:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Are We There Yet?: World Adventure

Hello Bwilkins, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Are We There Yet?: World Adventure, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Finger woman. This has been done because the page is a very short article providing no content to the reader (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Finger woman. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Finger woman (talk · contribs) 01:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

168.170.204.99

As much as I don't think anything productive is going to come from that IP ever, would you consider just protecting their talk page for a bit instead of changing the block to cannot edit talk page? I only ask because its a 3 year block, and things could change to where a valid unblock might be forthcoming. I didn't want to modify the block without talking to you first.

168.170.204.99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) Thanks! Syrthiss (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with you changing it to a temp protected page in lieu of a talkpage locking. Thanks for checking! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I read everything and I don't know then how it works. I need help. It seems I removed some one talk as you said. I don't do anything now. waiting for your reply about image which was uploaded. Last image and now I can't even find it. What can I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Royal House of Osman (talk • contribs)

User:The Royal House of Osman

This is a classic single purpose account, which is solely dedicated to publicizing people he/she claims to be the rightful heirs to the Royal House of Turkey, supposedly based on her/his original research in Russian archives. The name they want to change to is just an abbreviation for the current spamusername. I fail to see how unblocking them to change to an abbreviation of the prior spammy COI name would be constructive. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should have stated that I agree with a username change to something, not necessarily this ... do you think I can research the Russian archives and find someone to become the rightful heir to my Mastercard bill? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page.

I created the page "Digo_Market" to inform about the items sold on the Digo Market. I'll also explain a bit about people who manage the website. Currently, this information clutters the Furcadia page since there is a growing amount of items on this market. I wasn't quite done with the page at time of deletion; could I recreate the page and put a construction tag on it? If not, what should I do to improve the "Digo_Market" page? Brassbird (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost done with the "Digo_Market" page. (User:Brassbird/dmsandbox) It contains much more information did it previously did. Needs more references, though. Could I put it up with a "needs more references" box at the top? Brassbird (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on here ... you're doing a standalone article on an in-game-related marketplace? Besides being non-notable in itself, It really reads like an advertisement and is fully in violation of WP:PROMO. I'm not sure why this article would need to exist? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll just reword some things that seem promotion-y and put it on the Furcadia page. It would be more appropriate there, since I'd be mentioning that "Furcadia has a marketplace" rather than "there's a market place on Furcadia." Brassbird (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like the best idea - shorten it, and include in-universe. Cheers! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you Bwilkins with my {{helpme}} questions and needs. Your clear explanations, options, and links are so helpful and appreciated.--Look2See1 (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gillian Duffy

What's happened to the Duffy page. She's the most famous pensioner in England. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.253.48.80 (talk • contribs)

Was deleted twice yesterday and now today for the exact same reason: WP:ONEEVENT and WP:NOTNEWS (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We may have to salt it. Syrthiss (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I already did ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:06, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Postdiluvian thanks then. :) Syrthiss (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gillian Duffy as a redirect page

Hi!

I had just created a redirect page from Gillian Duffy to the Notable Incidents section of the Election article, and I decided that I should let you and the other deleting admin know about it out of courtesy. I then discovered that there was a major debate about it on the ANI page, so I decided to explain my actions there. If you still feel it should be deleted, I won't consider it wheel warring. Stephen! ^Coming... 13:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

ok then will do

would of used a template if there was one (like the speedy templates) --Sghfdhdfghdfgfd (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as an attack page, {{db-attack}} would do as well...unless there was additional history on the page. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why are you trying to delete my page? I was just trying to form better information together for fans of the group Anchored. They had asked me personally to set this up for them. They are not well known enough to find tons of information about them online or anywhere else at the moment. They have only just come across the music industry in the last few weeks, as they tour with the group Saliva. Their debut cd and hit song have not even had the chance to see the store shelves yet, but I have provided all the sources that I can for the information that is available.

WP:CRYSTAL. How can a band be even close to notable if their first disc is not even in stores? If fans of a band want information, try going to the band's website, or even setup a fanclub - but not here, because this is an encyclopedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banging pots and pans

Hey, just wondering what your thoughts are on that block. I agree with your comments on his talk page, but I'd appreciate your thoughts- it's only my third block! Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't responding to warnings given by more than one editor ... they went and harassed the one person who first warned them ... they weren't paying attention at all. 12 hrs was a wakeup, I think. Congrats, by the way (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought. I was considering an indef but thought I'd err on the side of caution and go with a stern warning. Thanks for your time and for the congrats :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikireader41 continues personal attacks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kashmir_conflict

Background to incidents

In an attempt to reach consensus with the wikireader about the joining of two paragraphs in the introduction.
I explained some reason for justification for the joining as both Paragraph had similar info about Pak support of non state actors Then ask what does he/her think,
He was cooperative at first and ask for clarification of what i was trying to say .
Then after i try to give additional clarification .
He then started to go of on a tangent about saying same groups attacking in Pak.(attempt at a personal attack because the user think i am this nationality , i believe this because of his history)
Also saying that he is dyslexic and purposely writing incorrectly.But i interpreted this as a blatant attempt to commit another personal attack.(As i am dyslexic as a result in un-subconsciously misplaced/missing sentence structure and words) I have told him that I am dyslexic before .As a result he uses it at a another chance to launch another personal attack .To prove this accusation just look at the links of his/her history.

i have worked with other editors whether they be Jewish, Hindu Etc, on controversial pages and have reached consensus on many occasions .But this users has an agenda against for his own personal reason. This is the 3rd of many personal attacks , Harassment and also a possible attempt of baiting respond to him/her .

Also possible sockpupetting in page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mirpur,_Azad_Kashmir&action=history ,by wiki reader using Sachi shetty . Thank you05:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]