Jump to content

User talk:PiRSquared17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.68.251.54 (talk) at 03:11, 15 August 2010 (Not all humans are descended from the same African Homo Sapien ancestor, the Chinese evolved separately from Homo Pekinensis, watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJnuMx8KD84&feature=related). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Chinese people descend from Homo Erectus Pekinensis and NOT anatomically modern African Homo Sapiens Sapiens like everyone else

Dear PiRSquared17,

Thank you for your good faith edits! I am scientist specializing in the fields of anthropology and paleoanthropology. I am posting the following peer reviewed scientific journals which provide verifiable scientific evidence that the modern Han Chinese people have both the genes and morphological traits of their prehistoric ancestor, archaic Homo Erectus Pekinensis, and that they are NOT descended from anatomically modern African Homo Sapiens like the rest of humanity. Of course interbreeding between the Chinese Homo Erectus Pekinensis and the African Homo Sapiens has occured to some degree, but it does NOT mean everyone in China is descended from African Homo Sapiens. All of the following scientific studies are published in verifiable and reliable peer reviewed sources such as Genetics Society of America's Genetics Journal and Oxford University's Oxford Journals as well as BMC Biology Journal of Biology.

Please watch this video from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, which is also a peer reviewed reliable source:

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Please take some to time to read the following peer reviewed and published scientific studies:

1.) Genetics Society of America's Genetics Journal, "Testing for Archaic Hominin Admixture on the X Chromosome: Model Likelihoods for the Modern Human RRM2P4 Region From Summaries of Genealogical Topology Under the Structured Coalescent" by Murray P. Cox, Fernando L. Mendez, Tatiana M. Karafet, Maya Metni Pilkington, Sarah B. Kingan, Giovanni Destro-Bisol, Beverly I. Strassmann and Michael F. Hammer.

2.) Oxford University's Oxford Journals, Evidence for Archaic Asian Ancestry on the Human X Chromosome by Daniel Garrigan, Zahra Mobasher, Tesa Severson, Jason A. Wilder and Michael F. Hammer

3.) Oxford University's Oxford Journals Global Patterns of Human DNA Sequence Variation in a 10-kb Region on Chromosome 1 by Ning Yu, Z. Zhao, Y.-X. Fu, N. Sambuughin, M. Ramsay, T. Jenkins, E. Leskinen, L. Patthy, L. B. Jorde, T. Kuromori and W.-H. Li

4.) BMC Biology Journal of Biology "Y chromosome evidence of earliest modern human settlement in East Asia and multiple origins of Tibetan and Japanese populations" by Shi H, Zhong H, Peng Y, Dong YL, Qi XB, Zhang F, Liu LF, Tan SJ, Ma RZ, Xiao CJ, Wells RS, Jin L, Su B.

5.) National Geographic Society Peking Man (Homo Pekinensis) Lived in China 200,000 Years Earlier Than Previously Thought

Thank you! -- 71.68.251.209 talk


Speedy deletion declined: Tom Murphy (artist)

Hello PiRSquared17. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tom Murphy (artist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Nancy talk 15:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged for CSD because it was deleted on simpleWP because it wasn't notable. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well this is complexWP and we have our own guidelines and policies. Perhaps it would help if you familiarised youself with our criteria for speedy deletion before tagging any more articles. Nancy talk 16:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zxc123zxc123

User:Zxc123zxc123 has also made disruptive edits to the Jane Eyre article in addition to creating many inappropriate pages.--WickerGuy (talk) 00:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am too new on this Wikipedia to report to AIV. PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hi PiRSquared17! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kwiki (talk) 01:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! πr2 (talk • contributions) 01:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should I move a page?

The move was requested by User:Lindenhurstlib (here), a user without autoconfirmed status. The page had previously been deleted. Should I move it to the article namespace? πr2 (talk • contributions) 17:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which page? Diego Grez ¡aprende a llorar! 17:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User:Lindenhurstlib/Lindenhurst Memorial Library πr2 (talk • contributions) 17:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think, but the article should be cleaned up. --Diego Grez ¡aprende a llorar! 17:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'll try to clean it up. πr2 (talk • contributions) 17:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't agree

I disagree with your tag because you CAN get cans of Coca cola in large size. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEggs12 (talkcontribs) 01:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll redirect it for you. πr2 (talk • contributions) 01:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Christopher Connor (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved that to the user namespace. I, if I could, would have supressed the redirect. Just as a note, Pengguna is User in Indonesian. πr2 (talk • contributions) 17:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there was no need to inform you of this. I should have done it manually. Christopher Connor (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. It also falls under the "redirect from article namespace to user namespace" criteria. πr2 (talk • contributions) 17:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you! πr2 (talk • contributions) 18:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Cruise lake wilderness park

Hello PiRSquared17. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cruise lake wilderness park, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not rely on a page that does not exist. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:20, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: the article that it redirected to was created after the redirect, so my tagging was valid at the time. πr2 (talk • contributions) 21:59, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE Newsletter

GOCE July 2010 backlog elimination drive chart

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! We have now passed the halfway point, so here's an update.

Progress Report - Progress toward the targets has been good. 751 articles out of the approximately 1,600 we would like to get completed by the end of the month were done by July 15, so we will be very close to meeting the target for volume. However, we would like to clear all of the 2008 articles from the backlog, and there are still 892 left to do. Please consider choosing one of these older articles when looking for something to copy edit. If we focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue.

Participation Report - 95 people signed up for the July drive. This is a great result compared to May, when we had 36. However, in May only one person that signed up didn't do any copy edits, and in July only 59 of the 95 have posted any copy edits on the big board.

The task may seem insurmountable but please remember that if all 95 participants copy edit just one article a day from now until the end of the month, we will eliminate 1,300 more articles from the backlog. So please consider participating at whatever level you can! All contributions are appreciated.

This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa (Talk), S Masters (talk), and The Raptor Let's talk.

speedy declined

Hi PiRSquared17!

I have declined the speedy deletion of Talk:Federal University of Petroleum Resource Effurun, as there was an acceptable revision to revert to. It's always a good idea to check the history of a page before tagging for speedy, as it may be a valid page that has been vandalized. In those cases it is almost always better to revert rather than delete. Regards, decltype (talk) 18:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: remember me?

no it was toxicwastegrounds or georgiegibbons MC JayQuinncool MC JayQuinncool 21:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cross-over leilo and stitch cango

That template was used in the article List of American Dragon: Jake Long episodes. It was initially blank and I wanted to know where the template linked to. Can you please help me find the correct non broken template. :P --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 23:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify? πr2 (talk • contributions) 23:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean is that that article uses this template but I do not know what is the correct template. I tried going back in history but it seems all revisions use this template. I just wanted to know whether this template was previously deleted or not. --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 00:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody!


Stats
If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars.

GOCE backlog elimination drive chart up to 31 July
  • Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest.
  • Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+).
  • The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc.
  • The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono.
  • Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+).
  • The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK.
  • The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey.
  • The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr.
  • The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW.


Gold Star Award

Gold Star Award Leaderboard
Articles Words 5k+ Articles
1. Diannaa (248) Shimeru (200,392) Shimeru/Ericleb01 (13)
2. Slon02 (157) Diannaa (164,960) Chaosdruid (8)
3. GaryColemanFan (101) Chaosdruid (130,630) Derild4921 (7)
4. Torchiest (100) The Utahraptor (117,347) GaryColemanFan/Slon02 (6)
5. Shimeru (80) Ericleb01 (114,893) Bejinhan/The Utahraptor (5)

Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]