Jump to content

Talk:Leo Frank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.93.121.214 (talk) at 12:30, 17 March 2011 (Edit request from 74.93.121.214, 17 March 2011: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former featured article candidateLeo Frank is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 14, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted

Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence 1913.

I have read the entire official trial testimony record provided in 'References' and there is not a single word, sentence or phrase that suggests the Lindemann quote in the intro is true. This inserted quote is playing divisive politics and is unfounded. Please, if the Leo Frank entry in Wikipedia is going to be turned into a Gentile vs. Jews ethnic race war, at least provide some balance from the prosecution side of the case. The entire Leo Frank entry wreaks of taking Frank's side. The ethnicity of Frank was never brought up by the prosecution, though Reuben Arnold claimed if Leo Frank were not a Jew he would never have been on trial which is not true.

His trial became the focus of powerful class and political interests. Raised in New York, he was cast as a representative of Yankee capitalism, a rich northern Jew lording it over vulnerable working women, as the historian Albert Lindemann put it.

Reference:

Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence 1913.

Closing Arguments of Counsel, Luther Rosser, Frank Hooper, Reuben Arnold and Hugh Dorsey. American State Trials V. X 1918. HernandoMaya (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have yet another sock puppet -- I've lost track of the number that have been blocked who use the exact same argument and source. In any event, Lindemann is a reliable secondary source and his analysis belongs in the article. The analysis of primary sources by individual wikipedia editors does not belong in the article. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fact Check

Frank hired two Pinkerton detectives to help him prove his innocence.

Who were these two Pinkerton detectives? Harry Scott and ?HernandoMaya (talk) 09:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Removed Find a Grave as a reference that is considered unreliable. Otr500 (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 74.93.121.214, 17 March 2011

Please change "Phagan's friend, 13-year-old pencil factory worker George Epps, came forward to say that Frank had flirted with Phagan and had frightened her.[citation needed]" to "Phagan's friend, 13-year-old pencil factory worker George Epps, came forward to say that Frank had flirted with Phagan and had frightened her.[1]" This provides a link to the images within an authentic Atlanta Journal of this specific report. Feel free to use the corresponding image alone, but giver credit to www.rarenewspapers.com

74.93.121.214 (talk) 12:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]