User talk:Borchica

Pyramids

If you would just post a link to the text you want editors to look at, that would be fine and would avoid issues of copyright violation that posting the entire text on a free-content website produces. Acroterion _(talk) 21:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I've done that already. Dougweller (talk) 21:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

Please don't WP:edit war as you are at Bosnian pyramids. If you cannot resolve your concerns on the talk page, please see WP:dispute resolution for how to handle this. If you continue to edit war, you can be WP:blocked for disruption. — kwami (talk) 09:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Bosnian pyramids. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 11:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Direct personal attacks of this kind are not acceptable [1]. Please reconsider your interactions with other editors, and please remember that the article is not a forum for your personal views. The article owes its existence to the human-constructed hypothesis, producing an interesting article about the debate over their origins which the article summarizes. It is not a soapbox for an exclusive attribution to human construction. Acroterion (talk) 11:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

You are re-inserting amterial that cannoty be verified. there is no search tool in the left had window of the page so where do you enter the date? you have failed to explain this. If you re-insert this I will have no choice but to take this matrer to ani.Slatersteven (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Please do that. Then someebody will finally figure out what is happening. Borchica (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#user_Borchica

As requiested I have now launched an ANI.Slatersteven (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bosnian pyramids. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 12:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with comments and suggestions on the article I am to publish and which can be found at User:Borchica/ICBP Thx, B

Can you please elaborate on what you need help with? Wikipedian2 (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this needs to be put on hold because of the the relevant AN3 (which has resulted in a temporary block) plus a related ANI (concerning editor conduct). Shearonink (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AN3

You were warned twice, I've reported you now at WP:AN3. You really must stop reverting right now. Dougweller (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

Template:Z7

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Borchica (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin! I understand I was blocked because of threats with legal action and first because of edit warring, I edited one article more than three times in one day. I am sorry for doing it and I already removed the threat with legal action. I wasn't familiar with Wikipedia policy on both issues. I am not doing it again and I started carefully reading all the rules and guidelines on Wiki from A to Z. I believe I can contribute a lot to Wikipedia expansion and quality of contents the proper way from now on. I signed into Wikipedia as I am interested in pyramids and when I checked the content published on Wikipedia I wanted to correct some statements but not the right way obviously. I will definitely learn how to do it properly. I would like also to publish some new interesting articles. Please reconsider blocking me as I really learned a lesson.

Decline reason:

Removing the threat from this page is not sufficient. Unblock will not be considered until you have unambiguously retracted the threat of legal action. This point is not open to debate. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.