User talk:Hughpugh

Welcome!

Hello, Hughpugh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Recurring dreams 07:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Bennett (announcer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Bennett (announcer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ziggy Saw dust 19:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Torrance

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Torrance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 16:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

June 2008

Your edits to Hannah Shellswell

You have changed the reference format in contradiction of the guideline, removed WP:Persondata, removed reference handling code and added unreferenced material - [1]. Why ? Please reply here. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 10:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was not necessarily aware that I had added what could be considered as unsourced or original research. Some of the research carried out for the article was made using archived pages (to which I've included a reference). Apologies for any inconvenience. User:Hughpugh (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply - moved here to keep the conversation in one place. It was unsourced because you ommitted a reference; hence it contravened Wikipedia:Verifiability. The reference via archive.org that you have since added does not work [2] which is strange. Please answer my other questions. Thanks -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 09:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 17:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 17:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rae Stewart

I have nominated Rae Stewart, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rae Stewart. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 23:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Cyw

Dear Hugh, Thanks for your assistance and the edits to the new article on Cyw. I have an interest in Welsh language and media, and I am looking for someone from the Welsh wiki to do a translation or build an article on cy.wikipedia.org about this channel. if you know of anyone who has Welsh language skills or if you indeed could assist, please let me know. Thanks again, and I hope we can collaborate on some other Wales related articles. Regards, Thor Malmjursson (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BBC Radio Solent, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Troy (talk) 01:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Keith D (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging Leusa Mererid for further review

Hello, Hughpugh … I recently encountered the article about Leusa Mererid and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — triwbe (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi Hughpugh, I've just come across the great work you're doing on our coverage of British TV and I'm glad you're here. Looking through your contributions I can see why you might have run into some problems with your material being deleted. Please remember as you add material that it must be verifiable and you must cite your sources for every bit of information you contribute. I know it can be a pain to get the footnotes right, but Wikipedia has plenty of pages explaining how to do this well and you need to remember that if you don't cite your sources everything you add will end up being deleted sooner or later. Since you must have got your information from somewhere it shouldn't be too much trouble to make a note of where, and this way your contributions will stay in the encyclopaedia for ever, you won't get "unreferenced" tags slapped on your articles and the editors who've contacted you above will leave you to get on with it. It's also very helpful to other editors, saves time in the long run and is less annoying to the community if you provide an edit summary when doing anything. Thanks for all your work! 85.189.221.65 (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of David Torrance

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on David Torrance, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because David Torrance seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting David Torrance, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 212.84.102.163 (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Marsland

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Marsland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

It is unclear how this person meets Wikipedia's notability criteria

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jess Dunsdon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jess Dunsdon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable journalist

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nina Warhurst

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nina Warhurst, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable journalist.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 13:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jess Dunsdon

I have nominated Jess Dunsdon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Dunsdon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nuttah (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jess Dunsdon

I have nominated Jess Dunsdon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Dunsdon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nuttah (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynda Fulford

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lynda Fulford, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

fail to meet general notability guidelines at WP:BIO

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmundo (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clare Fallon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Clare Fallon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fail to meet general notability guidelines at WP:BIO; article has no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmundo (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your hard work is about to be deleted from Wikipedia

The article you created, Jess Dunsdon is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Dunsdon. The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

1. You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. travb (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock notice

{{unblock-auto|1=62.24.251.240|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Warning: Huggle is infected with spyware". The reason given for Warning: Huggle is infected with spyware's block is: "

Proposed deletion of Leusa Mererid

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Leusa Mererid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 138.88.32.143 (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Real MacKay

I have nominated The Real MacKay, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real MacKay. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Northern Exposure (video blog)

I have nominated Northern Exposure (video blog), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Exposure (video blog). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of The Real MacKay episodes

I have nominated List of The Real MacKay episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Real MacKay episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kenny Toal

Hi, I see you have removed Kenny Toal from the news correspondents section of North East Tonight, could you please explain in my talk as to why you have done this?

Thanks, Drew. This is Drew (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

–Signalhead ^< T > 20:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see above.–Signalhead ^< T > 20:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Radio Sheffeild

Hello am wondering why you re did the bbc radio sheffeild schdule and what was wrong with it please thanks miniwillde 20:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willde1 (talk • contribs)

Edit summaries

Hi Hughpugh. Your improvements to Wyvern FM are much appreciated, however, if you could please remember to fulfil the Wikipedia requirement of completing an edit summary each time - it would make the work of other editors much easier when checking for vandalism and spam. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hughpugh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 671 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Susan Nicholson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cameron McKenna (announcer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Bennett (announcer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Shauna Willis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David McKeith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ross Govans - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alison MacGregor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Becky Hunter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alan Saunby - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Louise Cowie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Lynne Rankin 12. Anne Smith (journalist) 13. Jamie Livingstone (broadcaster) 14. Rachael Solomon

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shauna Willis

The article Shauna Willis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

2 year old unsourced BLP - I could find no significant independent coverage that would satisfy general notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 16:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page 97.4 Rock FM worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. xd Rat 20:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratinator (talk • contribs)

Tudno FM

Hello Hughpugh. Can I suggest you give WP:NOTDIR a read? It sets out Wikipedia policy, and specifically says "Wikipedia articles are not... (4) Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, et cetera, although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules may be acceptable". I would think that a list of what news bulletins are broadcast and when and in which language falls foul of NOTDIR. Bencherlite ^Talk 23:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Livingstone (broadcaster)

The article Jamie Livingstone (broadcaster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Although there are hundreds of hits on google news, all are either (a) written by, and not about him, or; (b) about another Jamie Livingstone. WP:Notability requires significant coverage about the subject, not merely many news articles written by the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Joshua Scott (formerly LiberalFascist) 00:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hughpugh. You have new messages at Talk:Heart West Country.
Message added 05:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of Cameron McKenna (announcer)

I have nominated Cameron McKenna (announcer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron McKenna (announcer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hi. I don't know why you undid my edit. The impression you gave was that you were undoing vandalism. I'm sure that was not the case, but that is the impression you give if you do an undo without using the edit summary to explain your reasons.

I see from elsewhere on your talk page that you have a lot of people telling you to use edit summaries. It only adds a few seconds more, and it saves on a lot of bad will. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Stephen! ^Coming... 12:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sorry for not including an edit summary - I made the edit on the grounds that Ten 17 (now Heart) was being merged with two other Heart stations (in Chelmsford & Southend and Colchester). Rather than there being a separate 'Heart Harlow' (apart from some advertising), there is now just the one station for Essex ('Heart Essex'), hence the edit. Apologies for any confusion. Hughpugh 13:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I moved your message here to keep the conversation in one place. If Heart Harlow is no longer a station, you may wish to have a look at the article I originally added to the list of Heart stations, and make appropriate changes. Stephen! ^Coming... 14:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITV News: Reply

I have added a template for semi-protection for both ITV News at 5:30 and ITV News at 1:30 articles in the discussion section. I hope this may help. This is Drew (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And this failed. This is Drew (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Miller

The article Craig Miller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page without a primary blue-linked article to direct things to, of the two primary "try this articles", one has been deleted at AfD, one has never been written.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Nicholson

The article Susan Nicholson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long time unreferenced WP:BLP fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynne Rankin

The article Lynne Rankin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this journalist under the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Smith (journalist)

The article Anne Smith (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only sources I could find for her were from a PR firm (and thus not independent) and here about her being a breast cancer survivor, which has nothing to do with her journalism career. There seems to be no notable coverage of this individual, thereby failing WP:N and warranting deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoeydahling (talk) 04:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louise Cowie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Cowie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Cowie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[[how can I contact you re Jo Russell - you appear to be undoing my edits when I REPRESENT HER AND THEREFORE KNOW MORE ABOUT WHAT SHE IS DOING AND HAS DONE THAT YOU - I have lodged this as a dispute as you appear to not be contactable and are now threatening my to take away my editing rights. Please lets sort this. Why are YOU editing her page in the first place. Who are you]]