Jump to content

User talk:213.107.74.132

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.107.74.132 (talk) at 09:23, 16 September 2011 (→Unblock). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


STOP
This is not a human


Template:Archive box collapsible

Your recent edits

Hello my friend. Consider creating an account.

FYI: If you see an editor working on an article and saving edits at 8:00, 8:07, 8:10, 8:15, 8:18, then you should consider not editing it for a while just in case of an edit conflict. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please don't use all caps, as you did in this edit summary. It's considered as yelling.

Also, please remove all but one of the inuse templates at List of buses. (Remember, this is in the mainspace.) I will not edit until you have finished. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of omnibuses. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 10:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/User:213.107.74.132. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 10:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Registering an account

Was this something to do with registering an account? Would you like assistance registering? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:35, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to register, I just want a user page under my IP address.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HelpMe

{{admin help}} How long does it take for a redirect to be created from the minute you submit it?

It takes as long as it takes--Jac16888 Talk 12:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{admin help}} Dear admin, can you review all my redirection requests now please? --213.107.74.132 (talk) 11:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined two of them and left the others. You might want to check if there is an existing page at the title you are suggesting be redirected before making a request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{admin help}} What about the rest?

Just be patient, we're not here to cater to your every request--Jac16888 Talk 12:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Why is my talk page so long? How do you archive it as an IP? Thanks.

I'm not an admin, but I'm on IRC right now, if you have questions. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:19, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Help:Archiving a talk page--Jac16888 Talk 12:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to talk page

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:List of buses‎, you may be blocked from editing.

Please read WP:TPO regarding editing or removing other people's comments, and WP:REDACT re editing your own comments after people have replied to them. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of buses. Sorry, my mistake. DVdm (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's--213.107.74.132 (talk) 12:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. 12:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QUICK TIP

Add four tildes at the end of your message. It automatically makes your signature. Like this:

Hi Anna. I like bunnies too. ~~~~

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects

I will give you the respect of assuming that you have enough intelligence to know that these redirects are pointless. It is common sense that nobody would ever type in "3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679" looking for pi. So, I must guess that you are doing these just for fun. So, please don't waste their time with "joke" requests. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion

"You should change this to List of bus models." You should raise this at talk. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 213.107.74.132. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk#Rename page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- John of Reading (talk) 08:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bugatti Veyron Super Sport. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more disruptive edits

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

At least twice today you have posted to talk pages and tried to forge the signature of other users; here and here. This is not permitted. You were caught out, of course, and SineBot spotted your forged signature, which is presumably what prompted you to revert the second of these. (The first was a warning to an editor who hadn't edited for more that four months, and you'd been warned earlier about placing inappropriate warnings.) These are just two more in a string of disruptive edits, including your string of frivolous proposals at WP:AFC/R. You have been warned. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For how long will I be blocked? A week?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked you for 48 hours for wide-ranging disruption in many ways. The trigger here was your assumption that the edit you reverted to Multiple guitar players is completely unacceptable. WP:AGF is policy, and the edit contained an edit summary that noted a reason for the edit. If we need a second trigger, your reversion of one of two edits by the same editor within a few minutes to User talk:Aniketb.elec is also poor. Based on your own edit history, you of all people should know that editors sometimes quickly change their minds or alter a comment. How can an editor possibly "vandalize" his own comments? DMacks (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

213.107.74.132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I edited Multiple guitar players is to be nice. It had a tag on the edit, so I thought the best thing to do was to revert (what I thought was) vandalism, and references removed. I'm really sorry, it was done in good faith. Do you understand? I did it to be nice, but I made a mistake. Thank you, and I really hope I will be unblocked. For a minute, I thought 50.9.1.182 was doing something bad. By the time I realised, it was too late.

Decline reason:

This appears to simply be long term trolling on your part. There is no question that you are 85.12.88.17; I've adjusted the block length to reflect this. Kuru (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Why can't I get the unblock to work?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 16:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The unblock template works. You need to wait for an available administrator that wants to review your unblock request to come by and review it. The admins are like the rest of the editors here, volunteers. They come when they want to not when you necesariy waht them to come. GB fan 16:42, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I remember you

This is you, right?

I remember all these strange Urinary bladder etc. edits ages ago. [1] [2], and tons more pointless edits.

Quite a well-worded unblock request just now. An improvement over this.

You were blocked three times using that IP. The last time, you stated "...I won't make any silly edits, I will make good edits and help Wikipedia flourish, but only if you can give me one more chance to show wikipedia what good I can do, and you'll wish you never blocked me. I've turned good, and PROMISE no to make wikipedia bad. So please unblock me for the sake of Wikipedia..."

You add almost nothing to this project, while causing great disruption requesting nonsense redirects, warring, nuissance talk page posts, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.

I don't think you are here to help the project. I think you are here to be disruptive. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That IP is shared by many users. I did not make that edit.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Are you saying none of the edits under 85.12.88.17 are you? Really? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them are. But as it is a shared public network, that particular one was not mine.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 17:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


One?

  • 213.107.74.132
  • Red dot of death
  • Yellow light of death
  • Deal or No Deal (UK game show) ‎
  • Urinary bladder ‎
  • Urination
  • Bus
  • Gran Turismo (PSP) ‎
  • 85.12.88.17
  • Blue Screen of Death
  • Deal or No Deal (UK game show) ‎
  • Urinary bladder ‎
  • Urination
  • Bus
  • Ridge Racer 2 (PSP) ‎

So, the three blocks were for your edits, not another user's, right? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All mine. I've learent better.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And you were blocked using this account to vandalize:
You haven't "learent better". You should not be allowed to edit at Wikipedia. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did not use 82.198.228.37. The Urinary bladder is just a fluke. Promise. That's not my kind of edit.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you. The IP edited:
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare ‎
Bus
School bus ‎
Urinary bladder
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my edits. I never edited COD4:MW promise.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Either way. Your edits show a pattern of long-term incorrigible trolling and disruption, with very, very few constructive edits. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So how do I have a last chance of all last chances to show that now I will make constructive edits? I'll rollback vandalism, contribute, and I won't need any warnings, as I will be all good.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Really? You've been blocked at least five times. Only a fool would believe you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll wait for the block to expire, and help this project loads. I've thought about the trolling, and decided: You know what: There's no reason for me to do these. In less than 48 hours, I'll do good edits.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
82.198.228.37 is in Newcastle.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Will I be able to edit once the block expires?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you will be able to edit once the block expires. You can show some dedication to the project by registering an account and only editing under that account name. (You shouldn't do this until your block expires either). GB fan 19:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retirement

Why can't an IP retire?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Retire. Excellent idea. You can do that immediately. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unless you are paying your ISP for a static IP address, this IP address will get reassigned to a new user at some point. At that point anyone else that came on to edit wouldn't be retired. GB fan 19:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The £64,000 question is when?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The answer is we don't know. It could be 10 minutes from know, it could be weeks from now. It all depends on your ISP. Since we don't know when it will be switched we won't know if you are the person on the other end of the IP at any point in time. GB fan 19:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is no-one reviewing my unblock request?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know why an admin hasn't come by and reviewed it yet. Like I told you above, admins are volunteer and they do what they want, when they want. What difference does it make if your unblock request is acted on or not, you said you were just going to wait it out. GB fan 19:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is GB fan a admin?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If I am blocked, can I ask you to do edits for me? Only joking!!!!!--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No I am not an admin. GB fan 20:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a human

Do you like it? Got it off SineBot!--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

82.198.228.37

I have never edited under 82.198.228.37. Some of the edits are totally different. 82.198.228.37 is in Newcastle. 100s of miles/kms away (see whois)--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. 85.12.88.17 was the previous IP. I've corrected it in the block log. Kuru (talk) 19:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

6 month block

Why have you blocked for 6 months? IP's change, don't forget!--213.107.74.132 (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and if you change to a different IP address to come back and cause the same problems, it will be blocked. It's not this IP that is blocked for 6 months. It is YOU. --Jayron32 20:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What if the IP changes, and I improve, and help this project?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 07:56, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

213.107.74.132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please go to http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=20&target=213.107.74.132 to see all the good edits I have started on the Simple English Wikipedia. I'm now doing good edits and will continue to do so for ever. And you wait, and there will be 100s of good edits! So please unblock me, and I'll really help the project, or I'll change IP address and I will do good edits! Promise!

Decline reason:

Lies and competence issues. Even WP:OFFER would be a challenge for you, but feel free to try. Remember, YOU as a person are blocked - editing en.Wikipedia is right out of the question, WP:EVADE will apply (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wow! You troll, vandalize and get blocked and simple wikipedia too! Way to sell yourself. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see that i've stopped?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I can. You stopped 27 minutes ago. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've stopped at around 8:00(UTC). But I've stopped for good! Trolling, vandalism, never again! That's history!--213.107.74.132 (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not only are you continuing to troll here on your talk, but now I must thank you for pointing out your fine work at simple wikipedia. With edits like these: [3][4], you have now drawn our attention to whether or not you should be considered a candidate for banishment from WMF entirely on WP:COMPETENCY grounds. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you mean. Please explan in simple English.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why no?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted vandalism! See this and this.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A teaspoon of sewage in a barrel of wine makes a barrel of sewage. You are talking about a teaspoon of wine in a barrel of sewage. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What if I continue to do good edits?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "what if"? This is an encyclopedia, not a toy. The "good edits" should have happened from the start. If you were a normal user, we would tell you "see WP:OFFER" and come back in at least 6 months. As you have now provided proof that your edits on Simple are even inferior to your edits on en.Wikipedia, even WP:OFFER is pretty much unavailable to you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Inferior? I've improved. Wait a few days/weeks/months, and there will be 100s of good edits. Visit the link as often as you can!--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:213.107.74.132&oldid=450778840"