User talk:TLSuda

Archives

Archive 1: 2007 - present

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

ACC

Hello, TLSuda. You have new messages at Mlpearc's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mlpearc powwow 17:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Four Seasons

Why do people like you keep reverting my edits?! Can't you see I've explained why I did it? Stop being so blind and think before you act! 69.123.125.243 (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eurosonic Festival warning

I check the reference to this user's edit. It is legitimate. Could you please withdraw your warning for this user? I made the same mistake too. Techman224^Talk 21:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for info! Done! -- RandorXeus. 22:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

Hello, TLSuda. You have new messages at Mlpearc's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mlpearc powwow 17:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mlpearc powwow 21:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

... for reverting vandalism on my user page! Lagrange 613 17:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem, Mate. :) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Username change

I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is RandorXeus. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lomax Magnet Elementary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia's National Championship Claims

Hey I started a discussion about Georgia's claims: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:College_football_national_championships_in_NCAA_Division_I_FBS#Georgia.27s_Claims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolenath (talk • contribs) 03:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to the discussion. I dunno if you like my response, but its there. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accountcreator

Hello ТимофейЛееСуда, since you are highly active on the account creation interface, I have enabled accountcreator on your account. This will enable you to ignore the normal limit on daily account creations and other checks. Please take note of the following points:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority.
Be sure that the conflicting account is inactive when overriding the spoofing check.
Creation of inappropriate accounts or pages may lead to its removal.
Disruptive editing of edit notices may lead to its removal
You can display the {{Accountcreator topicon}} top icon or the {{User wikipedia/accountcreator}} userbox on your user page.
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it.

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask me. Otherwise, happy editing! Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sullivan Edits

I am trying to correct factual inaccuracies and inconsistencies with the source reference to the section on Andrew Sullivan's Oxford career. I do not believe these edits violate NPOV rules (in fact the other editor's revisions are worse if mine are in any way not 100% accurate). If you have an alternative point of view kindly take the time to discuss, or offer a more effective edit. Simply reverting other people's legitimate edits is not helpful and tends to waste everyone's time. Thank you.90.206.62.135 (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Show me some legitimate sources and I'll believe you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source is there, currently reference #7. It wasn't even me who posted it.90.206.62.135 (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. I apologize for that. I did some more research and it is true. I removed the warning I posted. I can honestly say that I never would've believed it, but its been cited by multiple sources. I'll back you up on it if it ever becomes an issue again.

-- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion continues at Talk:Andrew Sullivan. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image work

Thanks. I'm trying to tackle the backlog of Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons by sorting through the files listed there. Cloudbound (talk) 02:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I'm doing the same for Category:Orphan images. Different goals, same paths. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: File:Parody Wikipedia logo - That's No Moon.jpg

Hello ТимофейЛееСуда. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Parody Wikipedia logo - That's No Moon.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not pure vandalism - take to WP:FFD instead. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toolserver User Screening Control

993020b08308f905c7304db0e5bebc0b

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lomax Magnet Elementary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsborough County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: File:Rabbit Interior Sebastiaan Bremer.jpg

Hello ТимофейЛееСуда. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Rabbit Interior Sebastiaan Bremer.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: How is this a Hoax? Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 04:36, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Baghdad University

You reported File:BaghdadUniversity.png as a copyright violation, but I'm not sure that I agree, so I have changed it into a PUF report instead. You might wish to comment here: Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 19#File:BaghdadUniversity.png. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Godalming.JPG

Can you please explain what is going on. Is someone going through every single image I have uploaded or are people going through all images at the moment. Could someone also please use their brain before constantly sending me these deletion notices asking me to edit the file description, I do not know what BS wikipedia jargon is required to state the obvious, which is that these are civic arms, owned by nobody and their reproduction on this site is normal, not controversial and why can't the people who are identifying the files that need that description amended not just do it themselves? Wikipedia is becoming every more pedantic and irritating with every day that passes.Aetheling1125 15:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Editors are constantly going through images especially ones that are not used in association with articles. I listed it for deletion because it does not have a source. (ie where did you get the image from). On the link listed in the summary is a slightly different image and underneath it is says "All Rights Reserved" (ie copywritten). If it is in the public domain that is fine, but it needs to have a source. Also, in response to your question as to why people who are identifying them as needing description or sources, this is because it is the burden of the uploader (you in this case) to prove that it can be successfully used on Wikipedia. I am saddened that you feel that Wikipedia is becoming pedantic and irritating, but no one is forcing you to be here. You do not have to change the descriptions on your images, they can just be deleted. I think that very few people are getting images deleted just for the fun of it. There are reasons there are policies in place. If you would like assistance with these or anything else, I am more than happy to help. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: File:Full-thickness forehead flap, after stage 1.jpg

Hello ТимофейЛееСуда. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Full-thickness forehead flap, after stage 1.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: eyes and mouth are blacked out to protect the privacy of the patient. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VANESSA NOEL STORE INTERIOR FRONT ROOM.png

Why are you bothering to move File:VANESSA NOEL STORE INTERIOR FRONT ROOM.png when it isn't even used in any article? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it isn't currently used in any article, doesn't mean that it has no purpose. It could be used in a future article, or one that describes stores as such. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To TMOTB, the purpose of the MtC drive is to move every file, regardless of if it's used or not. The hole point of the drives is to get rid of all the misplaced files, to have no backlog (as I made the 2 drives). I know that there is "Priority candidates" now. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Congreve.png

Hi, I thought I should notify you out of courtesy that I've declined your di request at File:William Congreve.png. As you probably know, all of the speedy deletion processes are designed for uncontroversial deletions. As you can see from the page, the image is of William Congreve who died in 1729. There is therefore sufficient contention to make di an inappropriate process to use. If, having reviewed the page, you still believe that you can explain how an image of 2-D portrait of someone who died 283 years ago could be other than PD, then I'd be happy to debate it with you at WP:FfD. Cheers, --RexxS (talk) 02:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain or not, I requested CSD F4 because there is no source. Who took the photo of the art, or who made the art, etc, etc. I guess I need some more understanding about why it is required to have source on some images, but not on others. Thanks for your time. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that you do need to understand copyright provisions a little better, particularly if you're going to spend time tagging files for deletion. I'll see if I can be helpful then. The case of Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. established in US law that a mere reproduction of any 2-D work of art cannot generate a fresh copyright. Any residual copyright in the File:William Congreve.png image could therefore only be from the original portrait. It is so unlikely that an original portrait of a subject who died in 1729 would still be in copyright that a reasonable presumption of public domain can be made. In that case, it simply doesn't matter what the source was, and it is therefore not required in order to verify copyright. I hope that helps you with the general case, which I'd be happy to debate with you, if you still felt uncomfortable. The point is surely that it is so overwhelmingly certain to be PD, that the source cannot be relevant.

However, in this case, I can be more helpful. The original portrait was painted by Sir Godfrey Kneller who died in 1723 and his copyright expired long ago. The painting hangs in National Portrait Gallery, London and Dcoetzee uploaded a version of it to Commons in 2009. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance to you. --RexxS (talk) 03:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irish_138.jpg

I'm the creator of this image. I added a line on the file page to this effect. It's been years I'm out of touch with editing, so I don't know if there are any new templates that would be more suitable for licensing info. deeptrivia (talk) 03:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]