Jump to content

Talk:China

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wilson20072000 (talk | contribs) at 03:49, 30 June 2012 (→‎Etymology of China is from Qin dynasty?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former featured articleChina is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 7, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 15, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
April 23, 2006Featured article reviewKept
March 15, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
March 31, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 14, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
August 15, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Former featured article

Template:VA

Template:Notice-nc-geo

Side of the road

Why is the side of the road China drives in listed in the overview? There are so many more important things that could be listed. Cking1130 (talk) 23:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's a standard field of {{infobox country}}. Infoboxes are generally used to convey such quasi-trivia and tabular data/statistics. If you want to change it, you'd be advised to bring it up on the template's talkpage. --Cybercobra (talk) 23:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of human rights in lede

Why does the lead not discuss the standard of human rights in the People's Republic of China.[1]? And also the illegal occupation of Tibet (according to the Tibetans[2])? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or the absence of a free opposition and democracy[3] or a free press[4], or the censorship of the internet - the most stringent in the world[5]? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 04:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Such as the North Korea or the Burma articles do. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 04:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
International media coverage of Burma focuses far more on the democracy situation, though I doubt the same applies to coverage of the DPRK. Within the past few months, I can definitely say that int'l reports on the PRC mostly have been on economic issues, the most recent NPC, and disputes in the South China Sea. This lends to WP:DUE, and is not to mention the already lengthy lede. On a side note, human rights and democracy do not guarantee each other 100% of the time, and rambling on over Tibet without mention of Xinjiang or Inner Mongolia speaks of crony, even cynical, double standards. GotR Talk 08:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I never suggested East Turkestan, Southern Mongolia or anything else ought not to be mentioned. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 09:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No independent verification regarding such information, Tibet is owned by China, so such information should be added in Tibetan independence movement. Clarificationgiven (talk) 09:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology of China is from Qin dynasty?

Qin, pronounced as Tsin in Chinese, so in English it should have been written and pronounced as Chin, then why would English pronunciation be Tʃai nə?