Jump to content

User talk:Kkm010

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tonkie (talk | contribs) at 14:47, 18 August 2012 (→‎Your addition to the Dell article: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Repeated message?

I curious as to why you are leaving the same message (about a dead issue) in multiple places:

The issue was resolved here:

Cheers!

--Woz2 (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the talk page of higgs boson I saw that numerous editors are finding it difficult about the introduction of the article that's why, I thought may I should provided a good source which would ultimately them to resolve the problem.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


No problem. It is a difficult topic indeed, but the Britannica didn't really help. Woz2 (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of countries by GDP (nominal). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your unexplained removal of well sourced material is unhelpful. Fasttimes68 (talk) 11:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had reverted with edit summary why its not imp to put UN figures.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your explanation. Please refer to the talk page for the article for further discussion. Fasttimes68 (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kkm010. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 12:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

NeilN talk to me 12:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of cleanup does this wikipedia page need?

I did some formatting changes and verified the citations needed for the article on the Wipro Wikipedia page. I would love to know why that Wikipedia page need cleanup as suggested by you and what kind of cleanup we are looking at?

Thanks in advance. Lets make the world a better place. Nikhiltsa (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some grammatical as well the spelling correction required with date fixation keep that some bot will resolve that problem, its a minor error. You did a great job by contributing substantially to the article. Thanks--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion and prompt reply. I rechecked the Wikipedia article for grammatical errors and which i was not able to find. It would be great if you can point out and help to get the article correct. Thanks

Nikhiltsa (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I am not able to find out any issues in the Wipro Wikipedia page so I would like to take down the cleanup warning. Let me know if you think otherwise.

Nikhiltsa (talk) 05:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry my dear friend some, bot would ultimately clean it up, its just a matter of time.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
You are doing great by editing the Wikipedia articles and making this place better for everyone. Nikhiltsa (talk) 05:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Armed Forces

I reverted your change to Indian Armed Forces in GF as he hasn't sworn in yet.Sincerely, TheStrikeΣagle 13:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have AWB browser?

Just being wondering, please reply. VanischenumTalk 05:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious to know: why did you say you did it with AWB in this edit? Sorry if I am wrong, please clear me. I hope you have a great day. :) VanischenumTalk 06:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Those are unsourced materials and that has to be removed.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gina Rinehart

I partially reverted an edit re Rinehart's education, and left a note at the talk page. Feel free to jump in the discussion if you think i've got something wrong there. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Your edit summary to this revision seems to be inappropriate. Please try to provide accurate edit summaries in future. Thanks. Salih (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Presidents of India

Per WP:NFLISTS, the use of non-free images in lists such as this is not supported. Despite the comments placed in the code, you re-added File:Dr Zakir Hussain.jpg, File:Varahagiri Venkata Giri.jpg, and File:Dr fakhruddin ali ahmed.jpg, all of which are non-free images. Even if such use were permitted, the images do not comply with WP:NFCC #10c, in that no rationale has been provided on the image description page for use on this list. I will be removing the images again if you do not happen to do so yourself first. I implore you to please avoid such use in the future. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for my stupid actions.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I pissed you off, sorry for that.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Star maja.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Star maja.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore lead

I was hoping that this would be a substantial enough change. What in the current version do you feel is excessive detail? It's about the same length as the leads for India and the United Kingdom, and about half the length of the United States lead (comparisons done through rough approximation of their length on my monitor). CMD (talk) 04:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The changes you made are good and its far better now. I would still prefer a three para in the top most section, if you see India article (as you know its nominated as featured article), in Singapore lead in third para you have mentioned "The People's Action Party has won every election since self-government in 1959, and governs on the basis of a strong state and prioritising collective welfare over individual rights such as freedom of speech, an approach that has attracted criticism from organisations such as Freedom House", I would say that's redundant it must be mentioned in the political section of the article. Try to make a three para article as it has been done in featured article India.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
India's three paragraphs are 349 words long, Singapore's four paragraphs are 367 words long. This is hardly a substantial difference. Moreover, the WP:LEAD is meant to be redundant. It's against MOS for information to be only in the lead, so everything in the lead must come from the article. The PAP is extremely important for Singaporean politics, having continuous national dominance. Lastly, LEAD guidelines allow up to four paragraphs, so there's no reason to change a consensus agreed lead of an almost equal length to try and reformat it into three paragraphs. CMD (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with you on this matter. Any political party can be dominant in any country and can win elections since its inception but politics should be mentioned in the political section not on top section of a country article don't you think so?. You can visit numerous other country articles to get a clear picture. If consensus has built on that issue could you please show me that "consensus page". I would like to say Singapore article shouldn't be no different from other good country related articles. Thanks--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Singapore/2011 archive#New Lead. The lead should summarise important points about the country. In Singapore's case, it has more or less functioned as a single party state for much of its history, albeit a democratically approved one. The lead would be sorely deficient without this, just as India's lead would be lacking if it didn't mention it was a multicultural federal state. CMD (talk) 07:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok keep that section and am removing the lead tag.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genre of Outlook.com

Hello, Kkm010

I'd like to discuss the issue of type in Outlook.com article with you. You have added webmail, email and web application but these terms are mostly redundant and only confuse the reader.

First, email: Outlook.com is definitely not email; it can send email but it is not email itself. If you meant "email client", well "webmail" already say that.

Second, web application: Again, all webmails are web applications. (Yes, I know that webmail also means webmail provider, but again, a webmail provider without a webmail client is not webmail provider; it is an ordinary email provider.)

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also confused could you please tell what is the basic difference between E-mail vs Webmail ? Secondly what about gmail, hotmail and yahoo mail some say they are e-mail other say they are webmail which one is true? basically e-mail or webmail is type of web applications that's for sure. I agree it does confuse other readers. Thanks--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Kkm010
"Email" is a digital message that we send or receive; it is a method of exchanging information digitally. It comprises of text, pictures, video and digital attachments. "Webmail" is a type of web application used to send and receive "emails". It is short for "web-based email service". (You can study their articles if you want.) Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail are webmails. Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! are "webmail providers". We also have traditional email providers. My ISP is one. It has no web interface; I use my Mail app on my cellphone or Mozilla Thunderbird on my PC to retrieve my emails.
You say "some say that..." Who are these "some"? But again, is what "some" say really important, i.e. does it have due weight? If you are referring to colloquial speech, you might be right (e.g. someone might say "this is an email" instead of "this is an email service") but we don't use colloquial speech in Wikipedia articles.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 05:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, for that information now I would change Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail as webmail rather mentioning them as web application.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate accusation of vandalism in Volkswagen Group

Edits that are made in good faith, supported by citations and follow Wikipedia guidelines are never vandalism. Your statement that a user is vandalizing the Volkswagen Group article is inappropriate. To focus on just one area in which you are in error, your repeated reversions have re-introduced a number of violations of WP:ACCESS to the infobox. The relevant guideline was cited in the edit notes, yet you clearly did not take the time to familiarize yourself with it. Please do so. If you are going to cite bureaucratic baloney and make accusations and threats, it's a good idea to make sure you own house is in order. In this particular example, it definitely is not. 71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make bullshit edits they are going to be removed.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 71.212.77.233. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Volkswagen Group, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits violate at least one important guideline. If held to account, you will not be able to justify your actions. Please re-consider before you embarass yourself further.71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits are unacceptable and they are going to reverted.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Despite being specifically referred to WP:ACCESS, you refuse to describe how your edits are justified. You are in clear violation of WP guidelines. You are failing to engage in constructive dialogue and are making edits that can not possibly be justified. This isn't looking good for you. Please stop before you embarrass yourself more than you already have.71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen Group. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I have looked at both GM and Toyota as you suggested and both are full of WP:ACCESS errors and other mistakes. Those really aren't good examples of "proper" infoboxes for a company. Also, it's worth noting that auto manufacturers don't have special infobox guidelines; all companies follow the same, standard format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen, you may be blocked from editing. Despite repeated requests for clarification, you have provided no feedback and no justification for your edits. Please re-consider your position. Your edits are unfair to those with less than perfect vision and do not align with the guideines laid out in the infobox company template.71.212.77.233 (talk) 06:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 71.212.77.233 (talk) 06:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone explain what the problem is here? Which specific WP:ACCESS guidelines are being ignored here? I don't see why we have to give the company name in UPPER CASE - legal documents usually have their own peculiar editorial style, and I don't think we really need to follow it in a WP article. I'd use an annual report or similar source to determine how a company usually present their name. Regards, Letdorf (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]
You will know everything once protection is over. That IP user putting bullshit stuff in the infobox and not co-operating at all.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.77.233 (talk) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to the Dell article

Hi KKM010, I think that you were the one that place the comment about not addng External Links to the page on Dell, so I just want to let you know that because I don't think such a requirement is needed nor wanted I mentiod this on the Dell Talk page to start a discussion on it and see if we can reach concensus. As I don't know if you are actively following this page but do think that your motivation to add this to the page is important I send you this message. Once read you can just delete this section on your Talk page if you want. Cheers, Tonkie (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kkm010&oldid=507990745"