Talk:Gallup (company)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gallup (company) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Business Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
United States: District of Columbia / Nebraska Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
The stub article about Gallup Europe should be merged because information about a subsidiary fits better in one artice about the parent organization —Preceding unsigned comment added by CZmarlin (talk • contribs) 03:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I forgot to sign it last night! — CZmarlin 15:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. -Pgan002 (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- I've found Gallup Europe being merged. What about merger proposal from Gallup poll? I'd agree with that one too.. 2aprilboy talk 12:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Funding?
Where are Gallup polls funded from? This is an important issue that may bias the polls or at least public perception of the polls. I can't find anything about it on Gallup's website. -Pgan002 (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Management, Board of Directors, top managers - Information, please?
Not much history of the last 15 years of the organization, nor its governance, Board of Directors, top managers, are easy to find. I have never been thwarted before in finding who runs an organization. Very odd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mydogtrouble (talk • contribs) 18:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Article omits valid critcism
Article is mainly corporate propaganda; no discussion of valid criticism of Gallup methodology by Alan Abramowitz (Alben W. Barkley Professor of Political Science at Emory University)Swantamer (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)swantamer.
- No he actually said, "The Gallup Poll should be commended for making their internals available to interested observers for secondary analysis -- few other polling organizations are so generous with their data. And to be fair to Gallup, they have cautioned that these results are not a prediction of what will happen on Election Day, only a snapshot of current voter attitudes." Rjensen (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Further Reading, by Jim Clifton
The Coming Jobs War ISBN-13: 978-1595620552 Publisher: Gallup Press (October 4, 2011) 97.87.29.188 (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Move?
It has been proposed in this section that Gallup (company) be renamed and moved to Gallup. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
The Gallup Organization → Gallup –
- Our company goes by "Gallup" rather than "The Gallup Organization." "Gallup is more recognizable. It would be great if we could redirect "The Gallup Organization" page to the "Gallup" page. 206.205.24.242 (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Gallup has many meanings and is a long disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose multiple uses, indeed we need to split off Gallup Poll into a separate article as well. -- 70.50.149.56 (talk) 23:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Redirect-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Redirect-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Redirect-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- Redirect-Class Nebraska articles
- NA-importance Nebraska articles
- WikiProject Nebraska articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Requested moves