Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Appearance
Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer
- Staszek Lem · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- Reasonably long edit history. I believe I understand the required policies. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Cheshirelad19 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I believe I have made significant correct edits and pages for Wikipedia so far and would love to become part of the reviewing team. Cheshirelad19 (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done I'm sorry, but you need a little more experience. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- ElectroPro · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- know whats going on in Wikipedia and familiar with all guidelines Greg Heffley 20:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Done, but I rather doubt that you are "familiar with all guidelines". Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Simeondahl · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- Hi there. I applicants for "Reviewing rights" because I already have Rollback, and it would be great to be able to use the tools that come with it. I removes much vandalism so it would be nice to be able patroll too. Greetings Simeondahl (talk) 14:40, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- John F. Lewis · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I take most of my time on Wikipedia towards improving the quality of articles and reviewing recent edits. I believe I may be a candidate for Review permissions per the supplied 'requirements'. If you see I may not be a suit for the permissions, Question my first, I may turn up to be one. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Piandcompany · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I have a reasonably reputable history with Rollback privileges and general vandalism control. Piandcompany (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Euroflux · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- 5 of my articles have already been accepted through the reviewing process, one of them candidate for B level, I wikified another article Berthe Weill, I have 2500 edits on en:WP, particularly in the domain of Aerospace Engineering and Economics of innovation Euroflux (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I am specializing in particular in writing biographies of top notch French engineers and executives, and in explaining the French Colbertist system to a worldwide audience.
- My articles, created, submitted and to be improved
- My categories for French grands corps & grandes écoles
- My categories for Aeronautics industry
- mes catégories grands corps et ingénieur aéronautique
- mes catégories industrie aéronautique
- Not done Per this. Reviewer is not a trophy. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Czar · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I know the rules inside and out, have Rollback, and want to be ready for some sweet PC action when it's reintroduced. czar · · 23:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Done, but I rather doubt that you know the rules inside and out. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- TruPepitoM · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I would like to help the community but by doing so needs a right. I also have rollback rights, fight vandalism through Twinkle, and understand the policies that go with this. TruPepitoMTalk To Me 10:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Pending changes has not gone live yet and is not likely to do so for a while. What would you do with Reviewer right now? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- I will accompany it with rollback and I will ease the workload since I am much of a new page patroller, but there's a chance I won't get the right just like before in August by Graeme Bartlett, saying that I don't need the reviewer right since I have rollback. Plus, why am I the only one not given a "done" or "not done"? TruPepitoMTalk To Me 06:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Pending changes has not gone live yet and is not likely to do so for a while. What would you do with Reviewer right now? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Vanischenu · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- The most useful tool/right in Wikipedia, I think. Will bbe very pleased to help with this one. I will be waiting for the time when the pending changes will be activated in enwp.···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 22:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you!···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 18:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Greatuser · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I'm requesting this right so that when pending changes is reinstated I can help review edits to Bollywood-related articles and Indian Television-related articles primarily, and others when needed. I have 400 edits, Recently it may be less but I have experience on Wikipedia, I will make more contributions to Update/Create Pages on Wikipedia Greatuser (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done I'm sorry, but with only ~400 edits I cannot tell whether you have the experience needed to use the
'reviewer'
user privilege. Please return when you have more experience. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)- Please Give me this right if i don't have experience then take back this right from me, Thank You Greatuser (talk) 04:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- You have fewer than 300 edits to mainspace and as far as I can see none of them involve counter vandalism or new page patrolling. You you don't need any special rights to do this and you must make a significant number of such edits for us to be able to evaluate your work. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Please Give me this right if i don't have experience then take back this right from me, Thank You Greatuser (talk) 04:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done I'm sorry, but with only ~400 edits I cannot tell whether you have the experience needed to use the
- Torreslfchero · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I believe that I'm familiar with the wikipedia policy. I also have rollback rights and also look through articles trying to find out vandalism and other things that doesn't fit in the articles. Torreslfchero (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Obvious done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Torreslfchero (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Obvious done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ymblanter · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I understand that this board will become kind of busy in late November, so I guess it is easier if I get the flag now. I am obviously not going to use it before PC goes live Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Obviously experienced enough. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Obviously experienced enough. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Widr · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- Since I've been fighting a lot of vandalism lately, I think this would be another useful way to work for the community. Widr (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Webclient101 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I have been fighting vandalism for sometime now and I would like to help Wikipedia by reviewing as well. I have read and understood WP:Reviewing. Thank you. Webclient101 (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done. After reviewing your edits I am concerned that you are not always using the correct CSD criteria and not using the appropriate user warnings. You may find it useful to read WP:NPP and WP:Deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have already read those pages. But you know what Kudpung? Your right, I have made some mistakes with WP:CSD. I will to be more careful with tagging articles with CSD. --Webclient101 (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done. After reviewing your edits I am concerned that you are not always using the correct CSD criteria and not using the appropriate user warnings. You may find it useful to read WP:NPP and WP:Deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)