Jump to content

User talk:Sahara4u

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Greatuser (talk | contribs) at 12:21, 8 January 2013 (→‎Peer Review ->> Balan: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

bg-color:"LightGreen"

User:Sahara4u
User:Sahara4u
User talk:Sahara4u
User talk:Sahara4u
Special:Prefixindex/User:Sahara4u
Special:Prefixindex/User:Sahara4u
User:Sahara4u/Awards
User:Sahara4u/Awards
User:Sahara4u/Sandbox
User:Sahara4u/Sandbox
Special:Sahara4u/Contributions
Special:Sahara4u/Contributions
User:Sahara4u/Userboxes
User:Sahara4u/Userboxes
User:Sahara4u/My articles
User:Sahara4u/My articles
User:Sahara4u/Templates
User:Sahara4u/Templates
User:Sahara4u/DYK?
User:Sahara4u/DYK?
User:Sahara4u/DYK/Reviewed
User:Sahara4u/DYK/Reviewed
User:Sahara4u/Today's featured list
User:Sahara4u/Today's featured list
Special:Emailuser/Sahara4u
Special:Emailuser/Sahara4u
















DYK for List of international cricket centuries by Alastair Cook

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAN of Munir Malik

Hi, I'll be reviewing the article which you nominated for GA. The article lacks comprehensiveness and might need a little bit of expansion. I'll take a detailed-look at the article before providing my next set of comments. Vensatry (Ping me) 14:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, there is no enough content about his early/personal life that's why I didn't add these sections. Zia Khan 04:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naheed Shabbir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PR

Thanks for your Quick review on Chopra list. Well, the lead was changed seeing its size but now I had edited it to previous versions. I think you would have no issues on this. Thank you and pls continue the review. Happy New Year.—PKS:1142 · (TALK) 03:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi zia, well please continue the PR and let me know what's you issues on the PR. Well, the points hinted by you was appreciated by other editors like rambling.an and giant2008. I'm not understanding what's problem regarding your issues as if you see lists like Alicia keys. They use (In year). Please, continue. I'm trying to sort it out. Thank you.—PKS:1142 · (TALK) 16:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My previous comments are still not resolved, so tell me how can I continue the review? There is a way of using (In year). You may use this but only 1 or 2 time, you cann't repeat a word or phrase in a featured content what you are doing now. Zia Khan 17:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Look at now, I had resolved except the color problem as I'm not understanding it.—PKS:1142 · (TALK) 17:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Don't do anything to the colours, they are fine! Zia Khan 17:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your every issue has been resolved....review and continue the PR. Contribute more and help in improving the list. Talkback on the page.—PKS:1142 · (TALK) 17:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, resolved your issues. Cheers.pls continue if you have any.—PKS:1142 · (TALK) 18:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No idea why you decided to delete the Peter Sellers on stage, radio, screen and record article from the WP:Today's featured list/submissions page, but if there was an issue, then at least highlighting the reason in an edit summary would be useful. - SchroCat (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reasoning was only ten submissions at permitted at once, but regardless, you should not have used rollback to remove the submission; that tool is only meant to revert clear-cut cases of vandalism, and should not be used to revert good faith contributions. TBrandley (what's up) 00:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, my mistake. I'll take care in future. Zia Khan 04:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

Hello! Having just quickly chatted with NapHit, it seems you're the primary editor at this article, I was just wondering why it hadn't been nominated at FLC, and if you'd like some help with it, let me know. Happy to be a co-nominator and don't need any credit for it, should it be promoted. Let me know. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I created this and Clarke's list and did a lot of work on them. It'll be a pleasure having you a co-nominator, but as you know I'm busy with another list right now. I'll co-nominate this as my list get some support. Thanks, Zia Khan 22:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Thanks for the message on my talk page, and I wish you the same. Also, I'll re-review your current FLC over the weekend. Giants2008 (Talk) 03:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thak you and I'll wait you at FLC. Zia Khan 06:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Before nominating to Flc, I want to show you the condition of chopra's list. Please, review it and point out mistakes, if any on Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2. Thank you.—PKS:1142 · (TALK) 19:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this ASAP. Zia Khan 20:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review ->> Balan

Before Re-nominating to Flc, I want to show you the condition of Balan's list. Please, review it and point out mistakes, if any on Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan/archive2. Thank you.